Re: [Dump-users] Dump/restore 0.4b42 released

[Kenneth P. <sh...@se...>]

--On Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:21 PM +0100 "Keith G. Robertson-Turner" 
<dum...@sl...> wrote:

> If you can't update RPM to 4.7 on Centos, then if I were you I'd just
> stick with ext3 and the older version of dump

Note that ext4 is not the only reason to update dump, and in fact I don't 
really have any interest in ext4 at this time. But I do want all the other 
things that were updated.

I can build the SRPM with "rpm -i --nomd5" and bypass the check, and 
presumably tar will catch any corruption issues with downloading the 
package as part of deflating the compression, and that's the main thing I 
worry about in checking its integrity.

My server is also handling mail, which means I'm running ClamAV and 
SpamAssassin. I really need the "bleeding edge" versions of those packages, 
since AV and anti-spam need to move fast to catch the latest malware. So 
updating RPM to deal with that wouldn't just be a benefit with dump.