Re: [Dspam-devel] improving dspam
Brought to you by:
paulcockings,
sbajic
From: Thomas Preud'h. <ro...@ce...> - 2014-01-03 02:49:27
|
Le jeudi 2 janvier 2014, 14:51:41 Tom Hendrikx a écrit : > > As stated in the thread with Thomas, the problem is not in way patches > can or could be reviewed. The manpower to do so is missing, and there > are some patches out there that fix problems in code that nobody is > (or should be) running, f.i. the css-file backend. Right, I said I would change the default in Debian but forgot about that. I need to evaluate the impact of such a change and decide whether to go for mysql / mariadb or postgresql. Would you recommend one over the other? > > Applying the patch might solve the contributer's problem, but since > nobody in the DSPAM team is using the code in production, it's really > hard to test whether it actually works (or doesn't break anything else). I completely understand. However I can tell that people complained about this problem and when it was solved incorrectly new bug reports poped up. Then when it got properly fixed (last patch) all bug report were closed and no new were reopened. On the contrary, I got emails stating that everything works now. Anyway I noticed the change of status of 2 of my bug report so thank you a lot for reviewing my patch. Best regards, Thomas |