Thread: [Dspam-user] training for non-spam not working
Brought to you by:
paulcockings,
sbajic
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-04 17:07:45
|
when moving ham from thunderbird's junk folder(by marking it as "not junk") dspam never learns and continually marks new messages from same sender as spam. dspam log shows > Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. > process_message returned error 114. dropping message. systemd journal shows: > Signature retrieval for '%s' failed > dspam[25001]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. > dspam[25001]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. thanks |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-04 19:43:06
|
Hello, you need to post more information. How does DSPAM know that you moved from spam to inbox? Do you have a plugin or anything else that detects the re-classification? -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić On 04.01.2018 17:49, ITwrx.org wrote: > when moving ham from thunderbird's junk folder(by marking it as "not > junk") dspam never learns and continually marks new messages from same > sender as spam. > > dspam log shows > >> Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. >> process_message returned error 114. dropping message. > systemd journal shows: > >> Signature retrieval for '%s' failed >> dspam[25001]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. >> dspam[25001]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. > thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-04 22:48:26
|
On 01/04/2018 01:17 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > Hello, > > > you need to post more information. How does DSPAM know that you moved > from spam to inbox? Do you have a plugin or anything else that detects > the re-classification? > > Hi, i'm not sure how that part works so maybe i just never finished that part of the config. i'm using on server: dovecot 2.2.33.2-2 dovecot2-antispam-git v2.0.15.g649963a-1 dspam 3.10.2-14 mariadb 10.1.29-1 postfix 3.2.4-2 client: thunderbird 52.5.2-1 thunderbird is set to trust headers sent by dspam. i assumed(!) :) that thunderbird would send useful data back to dspam via dovecot when marking a message as ham. now i wonder if a plugin is required. if so, does a working plugin exist for tbird? another linux client maybe? thanks |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-04 23:06:03
|
Hello, thunderbird is not doing much in this game. The whole work is done by the dovecot antispam plugin. You need to look at your dovecot configuration and see if you can find the configuration for the antispam plugin. Usually it resists in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/ A working configuration for a thunderbird user using German folders could look like this here: plugin { #antispam_debug_target = syslog #antispam_debug_target = stderr #antispam_verbose_debug = 1 antispam_backend = dspam antispam_allow_append_to_spam = "no" antispam_spam = Spam;spam;SPAM;Junk;junk;JUNK;Junk E-Mail;Junk-E-Mail;Unerw&APw-nschte Mails;Unwanted antispam_trash = Trash;trash;Deleted;Deleted Items;Deleted Messages;Gel&APY-schte Elemente;Gel&APY-schte Objekte antispam_unsure = Check;check antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature antispam_signature_missing = move antispam_dspam_binary = /usr/bin/dspam antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s antispam_dspam_spam = --class=spam antispam_dspam_notspam = --class=innocent antispam_dspam_result_header = X-DSPAM-Result antispam_dspam_result_blacklist = Virus;Blocklisted;Blacklisted } Can you post your configuration of the plugin? And can you post the following entries from your dspam.conf? MySQLUIDInSignature Preference ParseToHeaders ChangeModeOnParse ChangeUserOnParse If your config is in one file then you could use grep to just get the above entries: grep "^\(MySQLUIDInSignature\|Preference\|ParseToHeaders\|ChangeModeOnParse\|ChangeUserOnParse\)" /etc/dspam/dspam.conf -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić On 04.01.2018 23:48, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/04/2018 01:17 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> you need to post more information. How does DSPAM know that you moved >> from spam to inbox? Do you have a plugin or anything else that detects >> the re-classification? >> >> > Hi, > > i'm not sure how that part works so maybe i just never finished that > part of the config. > > > i'm using on server: > > dovecot 2.2.33.2-2 > > dovecot2-antispam-git v2.0.15.g649963a-1 > > dspam 3.10.2-14 > > mariadb 10.1.29-1 > > postfix 3.2.4-2 > > client: > > thunderbird 52.5.2-1 > > thunderbird is set to trust headers sent by dspam. i assumed(!) :) that > thunderbird would send useful data back to dspam via dovecot when > marking a message as ham. now i wonder if a plugin is required. if so, > does a working plugin exist for tbird? another linux client maybe? > > thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-05 02:51:05
|
On 01/04/2018 05:05 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > Can you post your configuration of the plugin? > > And can you post the following entries from your dspam.conf? > MySQLUIDInSignature > Preference > ParseToHeaders > ChangeModeOnParse > ChangeUserOnParse > > If your config is in one file then you could use grep to just get the > above entries: > grep > "^\(MySQLUIDInSignature\|Preference\|ParseToHeaders\|ChangeModeOnParse\|ChangeUserOnParse\)" > /etc/dspam/dspam.conf i now have > plugin { > antispam_backend = dspam > antispam_allow_append_to_spam = "no" > antispam_spam = Spam;spam;SPAM;Junk;junk;JUNK > antispam_trash = Trash;trash > antispam_unsure = Check;check > antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature > antispam_signature_missing = move > antispam_dspam_binary = /usr/bin/dspam > antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s > antispam_dspam_spam = --class=spam > antispam_dspam_notspam = --class=innocent > antispam_dspam_result_header = X-DSPAM-Result > antispam_dspam_result_blacklist = Virus;Blocklisted;Blacklisted > } in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and > Preference "spamAction=deliver" > Preference "signatureLocation=headers" > Preference "showFactors=off" > ParseToHeaders on > ChangeModeOnParse on > ChangeUserOnParse full in /etc/dspam/dspam.conf. still not working though. thanks |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-05 08:04:08
|
Can you please post the header of the message that you are trying to retrain? Just the one beginning with "X-DSPAM". -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić On 05.01.2018 03:50, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/04/2018 05:05 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> Can you post your configuration of the plugin? >> >> And can you post the following entries from your dspam.conf? >> MySQLUIDInSignature >> Preference >> ParseToHeaders >> ChangeModeOnParse >> ChangeUserOnParse >> >> If your config is in one file then you could use grep to just get the >> above entries: >> grep >> "^\(MySQLUIDInSignature\|Preference\|ParseToHeaders\|ChangeModeOnParse\|ChangeUserOnParse\)" >> /etc/dspam/dspam.conf > i now have > >> plugin { >> antispam_backend = dspam >> antispam_allow_append_to_spam = "no" >> antispam_spam = Spam;spam;SPAM;Junk;junk;JUNK >> antispam_trash = Trash;trash >> antispam_unsure = Check;check >> antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature >> antispam_signature_missing = move >> antispam_dspam_binary = /usr/bin/dspam >> antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s >> antispam_dspam_spam = --class=spam >> antispam_dspam_notspam = --class=innocent >> antispam_dspam_result_header = X-DSPAM-Result >> antispam_dspam_result_blacklist = Virus;Blocklisted;Blacklisted >> } > in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > > and > >> Preference "spamAction=deliver" >> Preference "signatureLocation=headers" >> Preference "showFactors=off" >> ParseToHeaders on >> ChangeModeOnParse on >> ChangeUserOnParse full > in /etc/dspam/dspam.conf. > > still not working though. > > thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-05 16:57:50
|
On 01/05/2018 02:03 AM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > Can you please post the header of the message that you are trying to > retrain? Just the one beginning with "X-DSPAM". > sure, thanks. > X-DSPAM-Result: Spam > X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Dec 27 15:28:33 2017 > X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 > X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000 > X-DSPAM-Signature: 5a441081121917356521135 |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-05 21:47:13
|
Assuming the mail you try to reclassify is for your own account (aka: in...@it...) then the following lines inside the plugin configuration: antispam_dspam_binary = /usr/bin/dspam antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s antispam_dspam_spam = --class=spam antispam_dspam_notspam = --class=innocent and the fact that the mail is inside your spam folder and you move it to the inbox folder, would result in the following command being executed: /usr/bin/dspam --user in...@it... --source=error --signature=a441081121917356521135 --class=innocent What happens when you execute this? What entries do you get in your syslog? Can you post them here? -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić On 05.01.2018 17:52, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/05/2018 02:03 AM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> Can you please post the header of the message that you are trying to >> retrain? Just the one beginning with "X-DSPAM". >> > sure, thanks. > >> X-DSPAM-Result: Spam >> X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Dec 27 15:28:33 2017 >> X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 >> X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000 >> X-DSPAM-Signature: 5a441081121917356521135 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-05 23:05:31
|
On 01/05/2018 03:46 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > Assuming the mail you try to reclassify is for your own account (aka: > in...@it...) then the following lines inside the plugin configuration: > > antispam_dspam_binary = /usr/bin/dspam > antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s > antispam_dspam_spam = --class=spam > antispam_dspam_notspam = --class=innocent > > > and the fact that the mail is inside your spam folder and you move it > to the inbox folder, would result in the following command being > executed: > > /usr/bin/dspam --user in...@it... --source=error > --signature=a441081121917356521135 --class=innocent > > > What happens when you execute this? What entries do you get in your > syslog? Can you post them here? > > > when i try your example manually in the terminal i get: > Signature retrieval for 'a441081121917356521135' failed > Jan 05 16:59:26 email.itwrx.org dspam[25337]: Unable to find a valid > signature. Aborting. > Jan 05 16:59:26 email.itwrx.org dspam[25337]: process_message returned > error -5. dropping message. no such message exists... ------------------------------------ when i reclassify+move a real email i get: > Signature retrieval for '%s' failed > dspam[25001]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. > dspam[25001]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. the signature is always shown as '%s' in the log (for all messages i move). so, either there is no signature being assigned or dspam is not being passed the signature? |
From: Paul G. <pa...@wh...> - 2018-01-05 23:25:50
|
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, ITwrx.org wrote: >> Signature retrieval for '%s' failed >> dspam[25001]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. >> dspam[25001]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. > > the signature is always shown as '%s' in the log (for all messages i > move). so, either there is no signature being assigned or dspam is not > being passed the signature? > >> antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s Perhaps remove the extra % character? +------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+ | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: | | (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com | | Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org | +------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+ |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-05 23:38:24
|
On 06.01.2018 00:07, Paul Goyette wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, ITwrx.org wrote: > >>> Signature retrieval for '%s' failed >>> dspam[25001]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. >>> dspam[25001]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. >> >> the signature is always shown as '%s' in the log (for all messages i >> move). so, either there is no signature being assigned or dspam is not >> being passed the signature? >> >>> antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s > > Perhaps remove the extra % character? > This is not the problem. Even when trying by hand manually on the command line he is getting an error. So the problem is more to be searched in his DSPAM setup than in the dovecot antispam plugin. > > +------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+ > > | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail > addresses: | > | (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot > com | > | Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot > org | > +------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-05 23:32:57
|
So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the signature is inside the db? When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email address you use is in...@it.... If not, change it to whatever your email is): select uid,signature from dspam_signature_data where uid=(select uid from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...') and signature like '%a441081121917356521135'; What do you get? Do you have an user id for your email? What do you get when you run this here: select uid from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...'; What do you get when you run this here: select uid,signature,length,created_on from dspam_signature_data where signature like '%a441081121917356521135'; What are your user preferences? Can your run this here and post the output (if in...@it... is not your email address then change it to whatever you use): dspam_admin list pref in...@it... -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić On 06.01.2018 00:05, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/05/2018 03:46 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> Assuming the mail you try to reclassify is for your own account (aka: >> in...@it...) then the following lines inside the plugin configuration: >> >> antispam_dspam_binary = /usr/bin/dspam >> antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s >> antispam_dspam_spam = --class=spam >> antispam_dspam_notspam = --class=innocent >> >> >> and the fact that the mail is inside your spam folder and you move it >> to the inbox folder, would result in the following command being >> executed: >> >> /usr/bin/dspam --user in...@it... --source=error >> --signature=a441081121917356521135 --class=innocent >> >> >> What happens when you execute this? What entries do you get in your >> syslog? Can you post them here? >> >> >> > when i try your example manually in the terminal i get: > >> Signature retrieval for 'a441081121917356521135' failed >> Jan 05 16:59:26 email.itwrx.org dspam[25337]: Unable to find a valid >> signature. Aborting. >> Jan 05 16:59:26 email.itwrx.org dspam[25337]: process_message returned >> error -5. dropping message. > no such message exists... > > ------------------------------------ > > when i reclassify+move a real email i get: > >> Signature retrieval for '%s' failed >> dspam[25001]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. >> dspam[25001]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message. > the signature is always shown as '%s' in the log (for all messages i > move). so, either there is no signature being assigned or dspam is not > being passed the signature? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-05 23:33:31
|
On 01/05/2018 05:07 PM, Paul Goyette wrote: > Perhaps remove the extra % character? that gives me: > dspam[25458]: Signature retrieval for 'imap' failed > Jan 05 17:31:00 email.itwrx.org dspam[25458]: Unable to find a valid > signature. Aborting. > Jan 05 17:31:00 email.itwrx.org dspam[25458]: process_message returned > error -5. dropping message. instead. |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-05 23:40:21
|
On 06.01.2018 00:33, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/05/2018 05:07 PM, Paul Goyette wrote: >> Perhaps remove the extra % character? > that gives me: > >> dspam[25458]: Signature retrieval for 'imap' failed >> Jan 05 17:31:00 email.itwrx.org dspam[25458]: Unable to find a valid >> signature. Aborting. >> Jan 05 17:31:00 email.itwrx.org dspam[25458]: process_message returned >> error -5. dropping message. > instead. No. Don't use simple '%s'. That is wrong. Look here -> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Variables By looking at your error, I can confirm that you are using IMAP to access your mailbox. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-06 01:07:45
|
On 01/05/2018 05:32 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the > signature is inside the db? > > When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email > address you use is in...@it.... If not, change it to whatever your > email is): > > select uid,signature from dspam_signature_data where uid=(select uid > from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...') and signature > like '%a441081121917356521135'; > > > What do you get? Empty set (2.43 sec) > > > Do you have an user id for your email? What do you get when you run > this here: > > select uid from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...'; 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > > What do you get when you run this here: > > select uid,signature,length,created_on from dspam_signature_data where > signature like '%a441081121917356521135'; 1 row in set (43.71 sec) > > > What are your user preferences? Can your run this here and post the > output (if in...@it... is not your email address then change it to > whatever you use): > > dspam_admin list pref in...@it... > > > i don't know what to make of this command. run against dspam's DB? with the dspam binary? -- Information Technology Works https://ITwrx.org @ITwrxorg |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-06 07:29:39
|
On 06.01.2018 02:00, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/05/2018 05:32 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the >> signature is inside the db? >> >> When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email >> address you use is in...@it.... If not, change it to whatever your >> email is): >> >> select uid,signature from dspam_signature_data where uid=(select uid >> from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...') and signature >> like '%a441081121917356521135'; >> >> >> What do you get? > Empty set (2.43 sec) Empty set? I see below that you got an entry for that signature hash but at the end it is not associated to your user id. >> >> Do you have an user id for your email? What do you get when you run >> this here: >> >> select uid from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...'; > 1 row in set (0.00 sec) Please post the full result of this query. >> >> What do you get when you run this here: >> >> select uid,signature,length,created_on from dspam_signature_data where >> signature like '%a441081121917356521135'; > 1 row in set (43.71 sec) Please post the full result of this command. >> >> What are your user preferences? Can your run this here and post the >> output (if in...@it... is not your email address then change it to >> whatever you use): >> >> dspam_admin list pref in...@it... >> >> >> > i don't know what to make of this command. run against dspam's DB? with > the dspam binary? > run it on the command line. In the Linux shell. |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-06 16:24:14
|
On 01/05/2018 05:32 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the > signature is inside the db? > > When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email > address you use is in...@it.... If not, change it to whatever your > email is): > > select uid,signature from dspam_signature_data where uid=(select uid > from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...') and signature > like '%a441081121917356521135'; > > > What do you get? please ignore my previous responses. i should have used the email address that has the junk mail in question. now i get: +-----+-------------------------+ | uid | signature | +-----+-------------------------+ | 22 | 5a441081121917356521135 | +-----+-------------------------+ 1 row in set (0.28 sec) > > > Do you have an user id for your email? What do you get when you run > this here: > > select uid from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...'; +-----+ | uid | +-----+ | 22 | +-----+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > > What do you get when you run this here: > > select uid,signature,length,created_on from dspam_signature_data where > signature like '%a441081121917356521135'; +-----+-------------------------+--------+------------+ | uid | signature | length | created_on | +-----+-------------------------+--------+------------+ | 22 | 5a441081121917356521135 | 2704 | 2017-12-27 | +-----+-------------------------+--------+------------+ 1 row in set (32.84 sec) > > > What are your user preferences? Can your run this here and post the > output (if in...@it... is not your email address then change it to > whatever you use): > > dspam_admin list pref in...@it... > > > this command doesn't return anything at all. thanks |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-06 22:19:00
|
On 06.01.2018 17:24, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/05/2018 05:32 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the >> signature is inside the db? >> >> When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email >> address you use is in...@it.... If not, change it to whatever your >> email is): >> >> select uid,signature from dspam_signature_data where uid=(select uid >> from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...') and signature >> like '%a441081121917356521135'; >> >> >> What do you get? > please ignore my previous responses. i should have used the email > address that has the junk mail in question. now i get: > > +-----+-------------------------+ > | uid | signature | > +-----+-------------------------+ > | 22 | 5a441081121917356521135 | > +-----+-------------------------+ > 1 row in set (0.28 sec) > >> >> Do you have an user id for your email? What do you get when you run >> this here: >> >> select uid from dspam_virtual_uids where username='in...@it...'; > +-----+ > | uid | > +-----+ > | 22 | > +-----+ > 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > >> >> What do you get when you run this here: >> >> select uid,signature,length,created_on from dspam_signature_data where >> signature like '%a441081121917356521135'; > +-----+-------------------------+--------+------------+ > | uid | signature | length | created_on | > +-----+-------------------------+--------+------------+ > | 22 | 5a441081121917356521135 | 2704 | 2017-12-27 | > +-----+-------------------------+--------+------------+ > 1 row in set (32.84 sec) Bingo. So the signature is there. What happens now when you run the retrain command again by hand: /usr/bin/dspam --user the...@it... --source=error --signature=a441081121917356521135 --class=innocent Does this work? >> >> What are your user preferences? Can your run this here and post the >> output (if in...@it... is not your email address then change it to >> whatever you use): >> >> dspam_admin list pref in...@it... >> >> >> > this command doesn't return anything at all. > > thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-06 23:17:23
|
On 01/06/2018 04:18 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > Bingo. So the signature is there. What happens now when you run the > retrain command again by hand: > /usr/bin/dspam --user the...@it... --source=error > --signature=a441081121917356521135 --class=innocent > > Does this work? Signature retrieval for 'a441081121917356521135' failed Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. process_message returned error -5. dropping message. |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-06 23:20:24
|
On 07.01.2018 00:17, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/06/2018 04:18 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> Bingo. So the signature is there. What happens now when you run the >> retrain command again by hand: >> /usr/bin/dspam --user the...@it... --source=error >> --signature=a441081121917356521135 --class=innocent >> >> Does this work? > > Signature retrieval for 'a441081121917356521135' failed > Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. > process_message returned error -5. dropping message. > > How the heck is this possible? Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-07 01:18:20
|
On 01/06/2018 05:20 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > How the heck is this possible? i don't know. :) > Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22? yes, i sure did. |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-07 19:32:54
|
On 07.01.2018 02:18, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/06/2018 05:20 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> How the heck is this possible? > i don't know. :) >> Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22? > yes, i sure did. This is strange. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-07 02:10:33
|
On 01/06/2018 07:18 PM, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/06/2018 05:20 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >> How the heck is this possible? > i don't know. :) >> Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22? > yes, i sure did. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user I was wondering what the current status of dspam (as a project) is. i don't see much activity for dspam anywhere. rspamd's site describes dspam as abandoned. are there any developers for dspam left? i appreciate your willingness to help me, but if dspam is completely dead i don't want to waste your time. thanks |
From: Stevan B. <st...@ba...> - 2018-01-07 19:39:07
|
On 07.01.2018 03:10, ITwrx.org wrote: > On 01/06/2018 07:18 PM, ITwrx.org wrote: >> On 01/06/2018 05:20 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >>> How the heck is this possible? >> i don't know. :) >>> Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22? >> yes, i sure did. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Dspam-user mailing list >> Dsp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user > I was wondering what the current status of dspam (as a project) is. i > don't see much activity for dspam anywhere. rspamd's site describes > dspam as abandoned. are there any developers for dspam left? i > appreciate your willingness to help me, but if dspam is completely dead > i don't want to waste your time. You are right. There is practically no activity for the project any more. If you need/want more support then rspamd is probably a better choice. > thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dsp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić |
From: ITwrx.org <in...@it...> - 2018-01-07 20:05:43
|
On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > You are right. There is practically no activity for the project any > more. If you need/want more support then rspamd is probably a better > choice. It's a shame, because besides this one false positive i can't retrain, dspam is basically perfect in it's spam classification. i don't need all the bells and whistles of these other projects. Do you know why people lost interest in dspam? i can't help to refactor it, i don't know enough c/c++. IOW, is there anything that could be done to revive it from the dead? |