From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-03-02 18:54:43
|
Bugs item #1441961, was opened at 2006-03-02 11:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=438935&aid=1441961&group_id=44253 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: JUnit integration Group: Would be nice if fixed ... Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Cheng (ericcheng) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: JUnit testing on a class without test cases Initial Comment: If a class extends junit.TestCase, DrJava always assumes that the class contains test methods. If it does not find any test method in the class, DrJava gives an error upon running the tests. This assumption may not always be appropriate because it is sometimes useful to subclass TestCase and base all other actual test cases on the subclass, instead of subclassing directly from TestCase. Although the problem can be worked around by making the class without test methods abstract, it would still be nice not to fail in the case where a concrete subclass of TestCase does not have any test methods. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=438935&aid=1441961&group_id=44253 |