From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-06-08 22:24:28
|
Feature Requests item #969261, was opened at 2004-06-08 15:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=438938&aid=969261&group_id=44253 Category: Definitions (source editor) Group: Small (< 1 pair-week) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Neal Horowitz (nrhorowitz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: enum keyword Initial Comment: Story: A user declares an enumerated type in the definitions pane under the new 1.5 syntax. The work enum is correctly colored the same as other keywords. I believe this to be an extremely straightforward change to the set of defined keywords in DefinitionsDocument (though I haven't ever added a keyword). The only question would be whether to try to add this as a keyword conditionally (only if they have a 1.5 compiler available). This is something I think we could do, though in my opinion, it doesn't seem necessary. Now that enum is a keyword in 1.5, it seems unwise to use it even with older compilers. I believe this is the same approach we took with the assert keyword, as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=438938&aid=969261&group_id=44253 |