From: Nicholas L. <ni...@by...> - 2001-04-06 08:10:23
|
The latest trunk needs these 1 liner fixes otherwise DRM(sg_cleanup)() ends up as an unresolved symbol rather than an inlined function in both <drm>.o and <drm>_drv.o for mga, tdfx, gamma, and i810. Both r128 and radeon already had it. add: #include "drm_scatter.h" -- kudos -- This latest pull gets me a whopping 25 FPS higher (778) in gears than my last pull (751). It just gets better and better! Thx all. Nick -- Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM. -- Bill Gates, 1983 Windows 98 requires 16 MB RAM. -- Bill Gates, 1999 Nobody will ever need Windows 98. -- logical conclusion |
From: Alan H. <aho...@va...> - 2001-04-06 08:40:26
|
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:09:16AM -0600, Nicholas Leippe wrote: > The latest trunk needs these 1 liner fixes otherwise > DRM(sg_cleanup)() ends up as an unresolved symbol > rather than an inlined function in both <drm>.o and > <drm>_drv.o for mga, tdfx, gamma, and i810. Both > r128 and radeon already had it. > > add: > #include "drm_scatter.h" > Fixed, but not by adding drm_scatter to the other drivers. Alan. |
From: <te...@re...> - 2001-04-06 15:04:33
|
When building the DRI tree with DRM module for the kernel, the default location to look for headers should be (this is the way Linus started recommending last summer, if memory serves): /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include=20 Right now, it looks like it only searches through /usr/src/linux-`uname -r` and /usr/src/linux --=20 Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d Red Hat, Inc. |
From: Joseph C. <kng...@de...> - 2001-04-06 21:31:17
|
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:04:20AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsr?d wrote: > When building the DRI tree with DRM module for the kernel, the default > location to look for headers should be (this is the way Linus started > recommending last summer, if memory serves): >=20 > /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include=20 >=20 > Right now, it looks like it only searches through >=20 > /usr/src/linux-`uname -r` and /usr/src/linux It would be better if the TREE variable were honored by the kernel module in CVS. In the meantime, I have made this change in my local tree. It won't work with 2.2 kernels of course, but who is still using those? ;) --=20 Joseph Carter <kng...@de...> Free software developer <darkangel> I generally don't use anything that has "experimental" and "warning" pasted all over it <darkangel> no, I'm not that dumb... hehe <Knghtbrd> ... * darkangel considers downloading the latest unstable kernel =09 |
From: Chmouel B. <ch...@ma...> - 2001-04-07 16:15:39
|
Joseph Carter <kng...@de...> writes: > It would be better if the TREE variable were honored by the kernel module > in CVS. In the meantime, I have made this change in my local tree. It > won't work with 2.2 kernels of course, but who is still using those? ;) latest 2.2.x kernel has the /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build thing. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel |
From: Joseph C. <kng...@de...> - 2001-04-07 20:48:51
|
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:14:44PM +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > It would be better if the TREE variable were honored by the kernel modu= le > > in CVS. In the meantime, I have made this change in my local tree. It > > won't work with 2.2 kernels of course, but who is still using those? ;) >=20 > latest 2.2.x kernel has the /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build thing. So I see.. I left 2.2.x a couple versions ago for USB that didn't panic the kernel every so often. ;) In that case, it should be used (and now is used, so it's a moot point..) --=20 Joseph Carter <kng...@de...> Free software developer <Oryn> anyone know if there is a version of dpkg for redhat? |
From: Michel <mic...@ii...> - 2001-04-07 16:20:51
|
Joseph Carter wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:04:20AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsr?d wrote: > > When building the DRI tree with DRM module for the kernel, the default > > location to look for headers should be (this is the way Linus started > > recommending last summer, if memory serves): > > > > /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include > > > > Right now, it looks like it only searches through > > > > /usr/src/linux-`uname -r` and /usr/src/linux > > It would be better if the TREE variable were honored by the kernel module > in CVS. It works for me when I append /include . -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer CS student, Free Software enthusiast \ XFree86 and DRI project member |
From: Alan H. <aho...@va...> - 2001-04-06 15:50:52
|
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:04:20AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d wrote: > When building the DRI tree with DRM module for the kernel, the default > location to look for headers should be (this is the way Linus started > recommending last summer, if memory serves): >=20 > /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include=20 >=20 > Right now, it looks like it only searches through >=20 > /usr/src/linux-`uname -r` and /usr/src/linux >=20 Thanks for pointing that one out. I've just committed a fix. It works o.k. for me - Can you test too. Alan. |
From: <te...@re...> - 2001-04-17 19:40:46
|
Alan Hourihane <aho...@va...> writes: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:04:20AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d wrote= : > > When building the DRI tree with DRM module for the kernel, the defaul= t > > location to look for headers should be (this is the way Linus started > > recommending last summer, if memory serves): > >=20 > > /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include=20 > >=20 > > Right now, it looks like it only searches through > >=20 > > /usr/src/linux-`uname -r` and /usr/src/linux > >=20 > Thanks for pointing that one out. I've just committed a fix. It works > o.k. for me - Can you test too. Oops, forgot to answer. Yes, it works for me on Red Hat Linux 7.1. --=20 Trond Eivind Glomsr=F8d Red Hat, Inc. |