From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-02-28 10:02:33
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 Summary: Fails to start X with intel+Ati video, whith modeset=1 Product: Drivers Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.36-2.6.38 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Video(DRI - non Intel) AssignedTo: dri...@ke... ReportedBy: os...@gm... Regression: No Created an attachment (id=49572) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=49572) /var/log/messages |grep kernel I have Acer 480TG notebook. It have 2 video cards Intel(integrated) and Ati 5470 (discreet). Problem: linux-2.6.36 - 2.6.38(older version not tested) fails to start X with modeset=1 on both drivers. I see console text(but promt doesn't blank), or black screen. Tested on: linux-2.6.36-gentoo-r5 linux-2.6.38-rc5 linux-2.6.38-rc6-git4 and 2.6.38-rc3* (Same problem with FedoraTestDay's LiveCD. photo: http://img809.imageshack.us/i/cimg3250j.jpg/ ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-02-28 10:03:16
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #1 from Antonov Nikolay <os...@gm...> 2011-02-28 10:03:07 --- Created an attachment (id=49582) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=49582) Xorg.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-02-28 10:05:38
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #2 from Antonov Nikolay <os...@gm...> 2011-02-28 10:05:29 --- Created an attachment (id=49592) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=49592) Kernel Config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-02-28 10:06:51
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #3 from Antonov Nikolay <os...@gm...> 2011-02-28 10:06:42 --- notebook ~ # lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Arrandale DRAM Controller (rev 18) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Arrandale PCI Express x16 Root Port (rev 18) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Arrandale Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 18) 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak HECI Controller (rev 06) 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak USB2 Enhanced Host Controller (rev 05) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak High Definition Audio (rev 05) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev 05) 00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak PCI Express Root Port 6 (rev 05) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak USB2 Enhanced Host Controller (rev 05) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev a5) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak LPC Interface Controller (rev 05) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak 4 port SATA AHCI Controller (rev 05) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation Ibex Peak SMBus Controller (rev 05) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Device 68e0 01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Device aa68 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Attansic Technology Corp. Device 1073 (rev c0) 03:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR9285 Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express) (rev 01) 7f:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation QuickPath Architecture Generic Non-core Registers (rev 05) 7f:00.1 Host bridge: Intel Corporation QuickPath Architecture System Address Decoder (rev 05) 7f:02.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation QPI Link 0 (rev 05) 7f:02.1 Host bridge: Intel Corporation QPI Physical 0 (rev 05) 7f:02.2 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 2d12 (rev 05) 7f:02.3 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 2d13 (rev 05) Gentoo, x86_64... any additional information/tests/bisects? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-02-28 16:48:16
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 Alex Deucher <ale...@gm...> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ale...@gm... --- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher <ale...@gm...> 2011-02-28 16:48:07 --- Does it work ok if you manually select the radeon as the primary gpu in the bios? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-02-28 18:15:06
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #5 from Antonov Nikolay <os...@gm...> 2011-02-28 18:14:57 --- When "Discreet"(Radeon only) mode activated in BIOS - works well. tested on linux-2.6.38-rc6-git6 linux-2.6.38-rc6-git4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-02-28 18:37:03
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #6 from Antonov Nikolay <os...@gm...> 2011-02-28 18:36:51 --- Created an attachment (id=49652) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=49652) Radeon_only dmesg Little "diff": Intel+radeon [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=3584M, BAR=128M [drm] RAM width 128bits DDR [TTM] Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 1400816 kiB. [TTM] Initializing pool allocator. [drm] radeon: 3584M of VRAM memory ready [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready. radeon only: [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=512M, BAR=128M [drm] RAM width 64bits DDR [TTM] Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 1498134 kiB. [TTM] Initializing pool allocator. [drm] radeon: 512M of VRAM memory ready [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready. I have 3Gb DDR3 Memory and 512(not sure)Video Memory (up to 1655Mb HyperMemory(tm)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-02-28 19:01:25
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher <ale...@gm...> 2011-02-28 19:01:15 --- looks like the vga switcheroo stuff is trying to resume the radeon driver which was never properly loaded in the first place. Dave Airlie might have some idea what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-03-01 06:35:28
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #8 from Antonov Nikolay <os...@gm...> 2011-03-01 06:35:19 --- kernel boots well without vgaswitcheroo, but radeon doesn't probe due to #15181 notebook ostin # dmesg |grep radeon [ 6.476805] [drm] radeon defaulting to kernel modesetting. [ 6.476807] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled. [ 6.476854] radeon 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) [ 6.476863] radeon 0000:01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 [ 6.476868] radeon 0000:01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 6.546117] radeon 0000:01:00.0: Invalid ROM contents [ 6.546171] radeon 0000:01:00.0: Invalid ROM contents [ 6.546190] [drm:radeon_get_bios] *ERROR* Unable to locate a BIOS ROM [ 6.546192] radeon 0000:01:00.0: Fatal error during GPU init [ 6.546196] [drm] radeon: finishing device. [ 6.547337] radeon 0000:01:00.0: PCI INT A disabled [ 6.547346] radeon: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -22 and I need vgaswitcheroo, because ATI card consume much energy and notebook works 2-2.5 hours (in windows about 6 hours). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-03-01 07:40:27
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 Dave Airlie <ai...@li...> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ai...@li... --- Comment #9 from Dave Airlie <ai...@li...> 2011-03-01 07:40:18 --- my first guess is that the ATI card is actually powered off at the start, and we don't try to power on cards to post them. I need to look at the code to see if I can readback the power state from the hw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-03-08 17:49:12
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #10 from Antonov Nikolay <os...@gm...> 2011-03-08 17:48:57 --- Created an attachment (id=50322) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=50322) ubuntu natty alpha dmesg fedora-20110302 (rawhide) fails to boot. Ubntntu natty alpha3 boots well. ubuntu: Linux ubuntu 2.6.38-5-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 22 16:10:15 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Linux-firmware 1.47 I compile 2.6.38-rc7-git4 with ubuntu kernel config(with minor chanes, like built-in sata-drivers, etc...), but it doesn't boot... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-04-09 20:28:32
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #11 from Antonov Nikolay <os...@gm...> 2011-04-09 20:28:13 --- Created an attachment (id=53992) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=53992) kernel bisect Ok... I bisect kernel. But I am not totally sure in result (because "bad" results does not happens every boot) Bisect shows that "bad" commit is d3147e86d71e74c93d361988d9441575da71345e but this is trivial patch, so I test commits-neighborhoods and 5222454cf941b09205d502242dd1e44fd62aa551 "bad" too. PS: after bug happens kernel(?) prints to console something like "__pm_runtime_resume() return 1" PPS: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36003 looks like this bug sorry for my English -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-04-11 21:46:31
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 Sebastien Villemot <seb...@en...> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |seb...@en... --- Comment #12 from Sebastien Villemot <seb...@en...> 2011-04-11 21:46:12 --- I am affected a quite similar problem. I have a desktop PC with 2 graphics card: one Intel (bundled within i3 core cpu), and one Radeon. Using kernel 2.6.38 (Debian version 2.6.38-3), I get: Apr 11 22:30:50 brouzouf kernel: [ 5.820704] radeon 0000:01:00.0: Invalid ROM contents Apr 11 22:30:50 brouzouf kernel: [ 5.820790] radeon 0000:01:00.0: Invalid ROM contents Apr 11 22:30:50 brouzouf kernel: [ 5.820817] [drm:radeon_get_bios] *ERROR* Unable to locate a BIOS ROM Apr 11 22:30:50 brouzouf kernel: [ 5.820843] radeon 0000:01:00.0: Fatal error during GPU init Apr 11 22:30:50 brouzouf kernel: [ 5.820866] [drm] radeon: finishing device. Apr 11 22:30:50 brouzouf kernel: [ 5.820868] [TTM] Memory type 2 has not been initialized. My configuration works fine using kernel 2.6.32 (Debian version 2.6.32-31). I do not use any special boot option (hence I am using KMS, which is activated by default under Debian). Let me know if I can help in any way to help debugging this, I really need this to work. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-04-12 20:54:02
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 --- Comment #13 from Sebastien Villemot <seb...@en...> 2011-04-12 20:53:48 --- Actually I resolved my problem by forcing the loading of the "radeon" module in initramfs, so that the Radeon card is initialized before the Intel card. Note that I also have to take care of starting the X server for the radeon card before starting the X server for the intel one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |
From: <bug...@bu...> - 2011-05-27 12:57:32
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30052 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) <ma...@3v...> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ma...@3v... --- Comment #14 from Marco Trevisan (Treviño) <ma...@3v...> 2011-05-27 12:57:16 --- Could this related to Bug 15851 too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. |