|
From: David R. <dw...@co...> - 2007-06-10 15:55:31
|
Larry,
We relaxed this restriction, I think because you pointed out that it
was unnecessarily restrictive ;)
So it now depends on which version of the schema you're using.
Version 1.3 is as you describe--you need to use records without divs,
or divs that include records, but records and divs can't be siblings.
With dpubs_journal_issue.xsd 1.4, you can mix it up more. So this is
now allowed:
<record/>
<div>
<record/>
<record/>
</div>
<record/>
<record/>
The purpose of the div is to create sections within a TOC, like
"Research Articles" and "Reviews". If you have an undifferentiated
TOC, then there's not much reason to use <div>.
Best,
--David
At 01:42 PM 6/8/2007, Larry Wentzel wrote:
>Henry,
>
>Only one thing catches my eye, which is something I had to have
>clarified to me. The <div> field is optional, but once you start using
>it in an issue, you have to use it for all of your records in that
>issue. For example, you cannot use <div> for the first three records,
>and then have no <div> </div> for the remainder of the records.
>
>Also, and this is an even smaller point to make, you can leave the
>label="" off if you have no title for a <div>. All that happens is you
>get a horizontal rule across the issue with no title. We've used that
>here at Penn State when we have journal issues with sections that have
>titles and other sections that do not.
>
>--Larry Wentzel
>--Digital Preservation Coordinator
>--Penn State Libraries
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>_______________________________________________
>Dpubs-content mailing list
>Dpu...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dpubs-content
|