Re: [Dps-devel] Static build trial

[Juliusz C. <Jul...@en...>]

KB> That's okay, I can fix up the Imakefile to make it build in the XFree86
KB> tree if we want.  I just haven't yet.  Would that be a good idea?

You mean, using xmkmf with an argument?  Don't you have include
problems if you do that?  If you can, it wouldn't be a bad idea -- I'd
learn something.

Now what I would *really* like would be a way to compile the DPS
module without first building the X server; but I believe you need to
do make World first to put the includes in the right places.

KB> I've fixed the link problem by building relocatable objects (imake
KB> target type) instead of library modules, that change is part of my
KB> patch.  The resulting dps object files link cleanly with the X
KB> server after this change.

Wow!  The mysteries of /bin/ld...

KB> But my problem is that I cannot compile the dps ghostscript directory
KB> (dpsi) without errors if I use the static XFree86 tree.

Include problems, right?  Sorry, I've really got no idea.

                                        Juliusz