Thread: [Dps-devel] Re: DPS.patch
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
jch
From: Juliusz C. <Jul...@en...> - 2000-01-17 19:33:20
|
> 11. Build the DPS client library. You might need to patch it with > `DPS.patch' to get it to compile and run. MY> Juliusz, could you explain or write a ChangeLog entry for DPS.patch? MY> If worth, I'd like to incorporate your modification into dgs/DPS/*. DPS.patch: updates the client library with information on the i386 architecture. Disables some error checking in pswrap that happens to be specific to AT&T lex and incompatible with flex. MY> Could I help the XFree86 team to introduce the DPS client libraries. That would be great. Are you an XFree86 member? I guess you ought to coordinate this with Mark Vojkovich, who once proposed to help me with this task. J. |
From: Masatake Y. <mas...@is...> - 2000-01-24 05:53:18
|
> DPS.patch: updates the client library with information on the i386 > architecture. Disables some error checking in pswrap that happens to > be specific to AT&T lex and incompatible with flex. I create a tar.gz of dps client library maintained by dgs developers. http://www.gyve.org/~jet/xdps-1.0.tar.gz I'd like you to test this tar.gz file with dpsx and tell me the problem or send me a patch. I'll incorporate it. (I haven't compiled dpsx yet. I have to get the XFree86 source files.) Your modifications for lexer.l and dpsconfig.h in DPS.patch were already done by BALATON Zoltan<ba...@ei...>. See ChangeLog of xdps-1.0.tar.gz. Therefore I think I don't have to incorporate it. I applied your modification for FontSample.c. However your modification for is not applied to xdps-1.0. If xdps-1.0 works fine with dps, I'll put xdps-1.0 somewhere properly. Masatake YAMATO |