Like stated in my forum post:
the parent-child relation still not work properly.
That is: suppose I have class child, parent and grandparent.
The grandparent contains a field id with accessors.
This field id will not be mapped in a child mapping. Even not when it's contained in the xml mapping file
However, it will be properly mapped when the id mapping definition is contained in the parent mapping definition.
I had the same for other fields.
So the problem is that only xml field mapping definitions from the direct parent are inherited and not from the grand parent... (only one level deep).
Hope this is enough information.
This bug was produced aleardy in 4.1 and not solved in 4.2
Log in to post a comment.