Re: [Doxygen-users] Bug related to grouping and namespaces.

['Carlo W. <ca...@al...>]

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:16:29AM -0000, Dalton, Barnaby wrote:
> 
> I didn't get the attachment but I think I have experienced a similar
> problem. The case I had was grouping functions defined at namespace scope
> (as opposed to member fns of a class). I found that if I did a @ingroup in
> both the header and implementation file then the function was documented
> properly.
> 
> Barney

Argh - I forgot the attachment :).
I'll attach it now.  But you're right, that solved the problem.
Nevertheless, this is a bug.  I suggest to solve it as follows:

When a function (prototype, definition and/or extern declaration)
is marked as belonging to a group, then that should take
precedence over a (previously read) definition without any
comment.

I found another bug by the way: the order of reading the input
files matters for addtogroup and defgroup.  I had one single
defgroup in one file, and used addtogroup everywhere else.
But doxygen refused to process the defgroup because it already
(first) saw an addtogroup.  I think that the order in which
input files are read shouldn't matter here.

-- 
Carlo Wood <ca...@al...>