RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style
Brought to you by:
dimitri
From: Adam T. <ad...@fi...> - 2001-11-09 15:32:14
|
Oh, come on, lets not get in a flame war here. Despite all the bad feels about microsoft, there are a LOT of companies that develop on its platform. To simply disregard their input at all is silly. If you stop caring about the needs of your customers, you end up exactly like M$, don't you? Adam > -----Original Message----- > From: Wagner, Victor [SMTP:VW...@se...] > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:48 AM > To: 'Christian Ratliff'; 'dox...@li...' > Subject: RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style > > Poor management decisions on the part of your company is no reason to > risk > breaking what is a GREAT tool for the rest of us. If you're so proud of > being a "Microsoft shop" ask THEN for THEIR automatic documentation tool. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Ratliff [mailto:cra...@de...] > Sent: Friday, 2001 November 09 06:05 > To: 'dox...@li...' > Subject: RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style > > > Dimitri, > > What can I do to help get this patch in? If it is through some "style > interface hook" mechanism, which Germar mentions, I am glad to offer > whatever assistance I can. > As for Germar's political perspective, whatever! We are a Microsoft > shop, > and right now I just want to convince people to start auto generating > documentation. The MSDN-style is my best chance to do that, since we are > all > familiar with that format. > > christian > > +-----+ > Christian Ratliff <cra...@de...> > Sr. Technology Architect > Core Libraries Group, DeLorme > "This is the very perfection of man, > to find out his own imperfections" - St. Augustine > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dimitri van Heesch [mailto:di...@st...] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:25 PM > To: dox...@li... > Subject: Re: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:25:21AM -0500, Christian Ratliff wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Has the MSDN style been merged into the code base in CVS yet? We use > > that style for all of our auto-generated documentation now, but I > > would prefer to move to a more recent release than 1.2.6. I have been > > monitoring the recent change logs, but perhaps I overlooked its > > mention. > > > > I'm still investigating the impact of Alexandr Chelpanov's patch. > It is quite huge, still has rough edges, and introduces a lot of > conditional > > code (mostly only for html, and even some IE specific stuff), so from a > test/maintenance point of view I am not overly enthousiastic yet. > > From a user point of view I can understand the MSDN style feature is nice > though. > > Regards, > Dimitri > > > _______________________________________________ > Doxygen-users mailing list > Dox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users > > _______________________________________________ > Doxygen-users mailing list > Dox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users > > _______________________________________________ > Doxygen-users mailing list > Dox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users |