RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style

[Adam T. <ad...@fi...>]

Again, for my 2 cents, this sounds good.  The trick is the get the HTML
generator fixes after such a split back into the MSDN style code.

Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Prikryl,Petr [SMTP:PRI...@sk...]
> Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 2:33 AM
> To:	dox...@li...
> Subject:	RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Dimitri wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:25:21AM -0500, Christian Ratliff wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >   Has the MSDN style been merged into the code base in CVS yet? We use
> that
> > > style for all of our auto-generated documentation now, but I would
> prefer to
> > > move to a more recent release than 1.2.6. I have been monitoring the
> recent
> > > change logs, but perhaps I overlooked its mention.
> > 
> > I'm still investigating the impact of Alexandr Chelpanov's patch. 
> > It is quite huge, still has rough edges, and introduces a lot of
> conditional 
> > code (mostly only for html, and even some IE specific stuff), so from a 
> > test/maintenance point of view I am not overly enthousiastic yet.
> 
> In my opinion, MSDN Style will always be IE specific, and 
> it will probably be focused mainly on HTML.  If MSDN Style 
> were to be merged into the official doxygen, wouldn't
> it be easier to introduce it via another, MSDN-specific 
> HTML-generator?  I think that this way it could be separated
> from the rest of doxygen, and it could possibly be conditionally 
> excluded during compilation for the environment where MSDN Style
> does not make sense.  
> 
> Microsoft likes to make changes and it does not like to follow
> standards, sometimes.  Too tight integration of MSDN Style 
> could spoil the doxygen core later.
> 
> Regards,
>   Petr
> 
> 
> -- 
> Petr Prikryl, SKIL, spol. s r.o., pri...@sk...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Dox...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users