RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style

[Adam T. <ad...@fi...>]

For my two cents, I certainly see value in the MSDN look.  The compnay I
work for has adopted Doxygen as its documentation standard.  It certainly
would be nice if I could convince them to use the DevStudio help integrator:
I'm lazy and F1 on internal classes and functions would be nice.  MSDN look
would go a long way towards that goal.  The main problem I've have with
doxygen and CHM, is that the index doesn't quite seem right.  Maybe its just
me, but in my index, I get: Classname, with a subitem of the destructor, and
it was subitems of the rest of the functions.  Has anyone else seen that?

Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Sten Darre [SMTP:sd...@ne...]
> Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 8:47 AM
> To:	dox...@li...
> Subject:	RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style
> 
> This might be a little out of thread, but I don't think MSDN-look-and-feel
> is going to make the difference as to '..to convince people..'.
> Since it might look allright - but it isn't a real Micro$oft-tool, hence
> they won't trust doxygen anyway.
> 
> They either just love it or hate it... no matter what layout is used -
> just
> my humble experince ;-)
> 
> Personally I think either layout is nice.
> 
> greets
> 
> sten
> 
> >   As for Germar's political perspective, whatever! We are a
> > Microsoft shop,
> > and right now I just want to convince people to start auto generating
> > documentation. The MSDN-style is my best chance to do that,
> > since we are all
> > familiar with that format.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dox...@li...
> > [mailto:dox...@li...]On Behalf Of Wagner,
> > Victor
> > Sent: 09 November 2001 14:48
> > To: 'Christian Ratliff'; 'dox...@li...'
> > Subject: RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style
> >
> >
> > Poor management decisions on the part of  your company is no
> > reason to risk
> > breaking what is a GREAT tool for the rest of us.  If you're
> > so proud of
> > being a "Microsoft shop" ask THEN for THEIR automatic
> > documentation tool.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christian Ratliff [mailto:cra...@de...]
> > Sent: Friday, 2001 November 09 06:05
> > To: 'dox...@li...'
> > Subject: RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style
> >
> >
> > Dimitri,
> >
> >   What can I do to help get this patch in? If it is through
> > some "style
> > interface hook" mechanism, which Germar mentions, I am glad to offer
> > whatever assistance I can.
> >   As for Germar's political perspective, whatever! We are a
> > Microsoft shop,
> > and right now I just want to convince people to start auto generating
> > documentation. The MSDN-style is my best chance to do that,
> > since we are all
> > familiar with that format.
> >
> > christian
> >
> > +-----+
> > Christian Ratliff <cra...@de...>
> > Sr. Technology Architect
> > Core Libraries Group, DeLorme
> > "This is the very perfection of man,
> >   to find out his own imperfections" -  St. Augustine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dimitri van Heesch [mailto:di...@st...]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:25 PM
> > To: dox...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [Doxygen-users] MSDN Style
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:25:21AM -0500, Christian Ratliff wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > >   Has the MSDN style been merged into the code base in CVS
> > yet? We use
> > > that style for all of our auto-generated documentation now, but I
> > > would prefer to move to a more recent release than 1.2.6. I
> > have been
> > > monitoring the recent change logs, but perhaps I overlooked its
> > > mention.
> > >
> >
> > I'm still investigating the impact of Alexandr Chelpanov's patch.
> > It is quite huge, still has rough edges, and introduces a lot
> > of conditional
> >
> > code (mostly only for html, and even some IE specific stuff),
> > so from a
> > test/maintenance point of view I am not overly enthousiastic yet.
> >
> > >From a user point of view I can understand the MSDN style
> > feature is nice
> > though.
> >
> > Regards,
> >   Dimitri
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Doxygen-users mailing list
> > Dox...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Doxygen-users mailing list
> > Dox...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Doxygen-users mailing list
> > Dox...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Dox...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users