RE: [Doxygen-users] Which version of gviz, and why?

[Catenacci, O. <Ono...@co...>]

Neil,
 
Why don't you try 1.7 and let us know what happens?  What's the worst that
could happen?
 

--
Onorio Catenacci
"People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to
harass rich women than motorcycle gangs"

--Unknown 

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Salter [mailto:ns...@ci...]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:20 AM
To: dox...@li...
Subject: [Doxygen-users] Which version of gviz, and why?


Hello,

 
Which version of gviz/dot should I be using with doxygen?
 
I feel that this question must get asked a lot, but I can't find any record
of it, and have had a good look round for the answer. The mailing list
archive search seems to be broken just now (a problem with
''/bigassraid/htdig//conf/11668.conf", which sounds painful).

The doxygen page says use 1.5, but using it on a fairly sizeable project
here, I get a broken image on the graphical class hierarchy (I'm assuming
this is due to a bug in dot, and not doxygen).
 
The binary download for gviz 1.5 for Solaris has disappeared from the gviz
AT&T site, though there is a binary download for 1.7c. I remember it being
difficult to build 1.5 last time, so I grabbed the binary distro. Luckily I
still have it.
 
Nor could I find the Solaris 1.5 binary download on www.gviz.org
<http://www.gviz.org> .
 
Gviz seems to have moved into the 1.7's. Is there a problem using these with
doxygen. Has anyone tried it? Is there any reason I shouldn't be using the
latest stable version of gviz? Is this likely to change as gviz moves on?
 
Sorry if this has been asked before. Should it be a FAQ? It would be useful
to know why an older version (for which it's becoming tricky to get
binaries) should be used.
 
In closing, thanks very much to Dimitri and the doxygen contributors for
such a great tool! Great stuff.
 
Thanks in advance,
 
Neil.