RE: [Doxygen-users] Class collaboration

[Jeff G. <je...@cr...>]

> Currently this is intended behaviour, but I would like to hear what other
> people think about this. Should template arguments, such as in the example
> above, be visualised in collaboration diagrams? and if so, how? Does UML
> cover these kind of relations?

The case of std::vector<ValueType> seems reasonable, but std::map<KeyType,
ValueType> would be tricky in my mind.  I wouldn't think that we would want the
KeyType in the collaboration diagram although that class is certainly used.

Jeff