[Doxygen-users] Opinion on sorting ToDo and Bug lists?

[Prikryl,Petr <PRI...@sk...>]

Hi Doxygeners,

Until recently, I was used to add my \todo items to the file level
or to the class level. Now, I am often adding \todo to member
functions. The good thing is that I need not name the method
in the comment.  The bad thing is that the \todo items for members
of one class are spread all over the ToDo documentation page.
This is because the items are sorted by member function 
identifiers without scope (i.e. class) names (even though I am using
HIDE_SCOPE_NAMES       = NO).

Would it be possible to consider the class identifiers be part
of the member identifier when todo, bug or possibly other lists
are generated?

Even better would be to put the \todo from the class level
first and the sorted \todo's related to its members, then
other class and its members, etc.

While it is usually a good idea to put each class to separate files,
it would be probably difficult to embed the file level \todo's into
that order; so, the file level \todo's could be put to the beginning or
to the end of the page.

What is your opinion?

Thanks,

Petr

-- 
Petr Prikryl, SKIL, spol. s r.o., pri...@sk...