Re: [Doxygen-users] w2k compiling failed
Brought to you by:
dimitri
From: Dimitri v. H. <di...@st...> - 2001-05-17 16:45:54
|
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:59:26PM -0700, Peter Thieß wrote: > I am using doxygen quite a bit among Win NT 4.0, now I started using w2k > professinell and doxygen refused to work proper. I looked into the FAQ but > did not find anything about w2k. > I am currently using version 1.2.5 of doxygen. Doxygen should work on w2k just like it does on NT. > > As a seccond step I tried (for the first time) to compile the actual tarball > version but it failed, see appended file - I would be glad for any hints > resolving this. For those that do not read images: Your error was: bison: Bad address This error is caused by bison not being able to find a /tmp dir (yes the error message is not very helpful). To fix this start a bash shell (included with cygwin) and type "mkdir /tmp". After that all should be fine again. > Further more I'd be intrested in experiences using doxygen among windows > 2000. > > The only output doxygen generates at my w2k installation is the following: > Searching for include files... > Searching for example files... > Searching for images... > Searching for files to exclude > Reading input files... > > It seams that doxygen doesn't find anything to do on W2K, whereas it did on > NT 4.0 .... I'm sure this is some configuration issue. Regards, Dimitri |