Re: [Doxygen-users] Two strange things about Doxygen and my code

[Bostjan M. <cco...@gm...>]

On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Christoph Lipka
<chr...@li...> wrote:
> Am 26.08.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Bostjan Mihoric:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Christoph Lipka
> <chr...@li...> wrote:
>
> Am 26.08.2015 um 11:14 schrieb Bostjan Mihoric:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Christoph Lipka
> <chr...@li...> wrote:
>
> Am 25.08.2015 um 18:36 schrieb Bostjan Mihoric:
> [...]
>
> /// @file
>
> /// My typedef.
> typedef void VOID;
>
> /// My simple function. Details.
> extern VOID Function(VOID);
> [...]
>
> [...]
>
> Yes, I agree that anything but "void" should be considered a different
> type. What I meant is, why doesn't it work when I try to use Doxygen's
> preprocessor to redefine "VOID" back  to "void". Surely it doesn't
> preprocess *after* deciding if function has a return value /
> parameters? If it's preprocessor replaced "VOID" with "void", why
> doesn't it then see it as "void"?
>
>
> Did you set "MACRO_EXPANSION = YES"? The default value of "No" causes
> Doxygen's preprocessor to only do conditional compilation.
>

Yes, resolved by this. Thank you!