Re: [Doxygen-users] Two strange things about Doxygen and my code

[Christoph L. <chr...@li...>]

Am 26.08.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Bostjan Mihoric:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Christoph Lipka
> <chr...@li...> wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2015 um 11:14 schrieb Bostjan Mihoric:
>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Christoph Lipka
>>> <chr...@li...> wrote:
>>>> Am 25.08.2015 um 18:36 schrieb Bostjan Mihoric:
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> /// @file
>>>>
>>>> /// My typedef.
>>>> typedef void VOID;
>>>>
>>>> /// My simple function. Details.
>>>> extern VOID Function(VOID);
>>>> [...]
[...]
> Yes, I agree that anything but "void" should be considered a different
> type. What I meant is, why doesn't it work when I try to use Doxygen's
> preprocessor to redefine "VOID" back  to "void". Surely it doesn't
> preprocess *after* deciding if function has a return value /
> parameters? If it's preprocessor replaced "VOID" with "void", why
> doesn't it then see it as "void"?

Did you set "MACRO_EXPANSION = YES"? The default value of "No" causes
Doxygen's preprocessor to only do conditional compilation.