Re: [Doxygen-develop] [PATCH] [2/2] prototype mistaken as class constructor: recognize typedef name
Brought to you by:
dimitri
From: Kevin M. <ke...@pl...> - 2005-12-20 05:59:13
|
Dimitri, we need to correct the information regarding the PATCH keyword - GNOME bugzilla doesn't have it anymore! Excerpt from #bugs: epn: bugzilla didn't use to be able to track or search for patches in any special way epn: so, we manually had volunteers try to mark all of them with the PATCH keyword epn: we couldn't ever really keep up epn: then, bugzilla got the abilities to search for it, and we eventually nuked the keyword Dave Dodge wrote: > BTW: On this page: > > http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/trouble.html#bug_reports > > it says "please use PATCH as a keyword in the bug report", but note > that: > > - The Bugzilla "new patch" forms never ask you for keywords, which > was confusing at first. > > - If you view the bug after submitting it, there is a keywords field. > But when I try to put PATCH in there, Bugzilla complains that > "PATCH" is not a valid keyword. I notice that if I get Bugzilla to > list all valid keywords, "PATCH" is not listed, but some of the > keyword descriptions mention it. So I'm guessing that it used to be > a valid keyword but was later deprecated. > > -Dave Dodge > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net > email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for > problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD > SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click > _______________________________________________ Doxygen-develop > mailing list Dox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-develop > |