Re: [Doxygen-develop] Const test cases working fine -- Re: [Doxygen-users] Doxygen-1.3.9.1-20040612 in CVS

[Dimitri v. H. <do...@gm...>]

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:28:31 +0100, Enno Bartels
<enn...@t-...> wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Am Montag, 6. Dezember 2004 19:38 schrieb Dimitri van Heesch:
> ...
> > + BUG: id 157085: Autolinks for const/volatile operators didn't work.
> > + BUG: id 157433: Multi-variable declarations were not parsed
> > properly.
> ...
> Thank you very much for solving this nasty bug.
> Now I can use "const" without breaking the doxy docu!
> 
> I think this has even solved the following bug
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
> 
> I did test this with the following test cases and
> everyone was working fine (for the first time) !
> 
> 1.  int charp_fctCall (char *)
> 2.  int charpconst_fctCall (char *const)
> 3.  int constcharp_fctCall (const char *)
> 4.  int constcharpconst_fctCall (const char *const)
> 5.  int constconst_fctCall (MyType *const)
> 6.  int constcharpconst_fctCall (const char *const)
> 7.  int intp_fctCall (int *)
> 8.  int intpconst_fctCall (int *const)
> 
> On my CVS copy of doxygen I do have an additional test
> directory for my test cases. And with "make test" it
> will generate the docu and check if it
> has the right elements inside.
> 
> Maybe it would be wise to add my and even more
> test cases to the doxgen cvs version. So a new version
> of doxygen could be tested automaticly for old/new
> problems very easyly!

I've working on a simple regression test suite myself (see attachment).
I think it is indeed a good idea to collect more test cases so any 
regression is found quickly. 

I've added your const functions now, and any new test cases or 
improvements to the scripts are welcomed.

Regards,
   Dimitri