Re: [Doxygen-users] are document generators dead?
Brought to you by:
dimitri
From: Albert <alb...@gm...> - 2014-10-07 17:39:54
|
Tom, You are talking about DITA, what kind of tools for converting DITA are you using / thinking about? Are they able to import e.g. the HTML as generated by doxygen or the XML that can be generated by doxygen? Albert On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Tom Johnson <tom...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks for your response. Looking at the document generators as a solved > problem seems like a okay argument. If the problem were solved 10 yrs ago, > why is there any need for additional development? > > Well, technology is rapidly changing, so there are always opportunities > for enhancements and further development. As I said, of all the document > generators I've looked at, Doxygen seems to be the most flexible (covering > many languages), the easiest to use (the GUI front-end tool), and has a > good-looking output. It also seems the most up to date. > > I'm mostly frustrated that document generators don't naturally integrate > with common tech comm authoring structures such as DITA. DITA is probably > the most common XML authoring standard among professional technical > writers, but it seems a world apart from document generator tools. I don't > see why Doxygen can't incorporate simple HTML files into its output. > > I also don't understand why the majority of web APIs, many of which are > probably coded using platforms that Doxygen can create documentation for, > aren't using documentation auto-generated from document generators. > > Tom > > > --------------------- > 801-822-2241 > blog: idratherbewriting.com > twitter: tomjohnson > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams < > awi...@wh...> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 22:03 -0700, Tom Johnson wrote: >> > Are document generators for APIs dead? When I look over the possible >> > options out there, everything seems built about 10 years ago. I don't >> > see anything new coming out of this genre of tools. I find this odd, >> > given that APIs themselves are exploding in popularity. >> >> Nothing new is required; this is a solved problem. Solved about 10 >> years ago. >> >> > I'm guessing that most new APIs today are REST APIs, and none of the >> > current document generators really address REST? >> >> ??? REST APIs are 'theoretically' self-documenting. Which is total BS, >> but the trope REST fanboys hide behind. Underlying any REST API is code >> - an API written in source code - that needs to be documented. And that >> can be accomplished with the same tools. >> > Can someone clue me in as to why there aren't more recently developed >> > tools? Doxygen seems to be the best of them, but even Doxygen seems a >> > bit dated to me. >> >> Why is it "dated"? Something that works is not obsolete. >> >> -- >> Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awi...@wh...> GPG D95ED383 >> Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer >> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports >> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper >> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Doxygen-users mailing list >> Dox...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer > Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports > Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper > Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Doxygen-users mailing list > Dox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users > > |