Re: [Doxygen-develop] dia support, again
Brought to you by:
dimitri
From: Jan D. <jan...@gm...> - 2013-09-30 05:09:45
|
On 9/29/13 9:39 PM, Dimitri van Heesch wrote: >> Feedback wanted: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707713 >> >> What is the preferred way for receiving enhancement patches -- via >> bugzilla, using github .. or other ..? > > Either bugzilla with attached patch or a github pull request are fine methods. > Github has a slight preference as it makes it easier to update the patch. Noted for future reference. > I haven't gotten around to try you patch and investigate if it makes sense to > have the \diafile command in doxygen (as opposed to having to add the dia->png conversion in a > batch file together with running doxygen). That's fair. For historical context, note that I added the dia-support to get away from generating png's and eps's during the build stage for the documentation; it was causing some annoyances (inconsistently updated platform-specific scripts, where to put generated files on various platforms/systems, and such). As you imply; the diafile support is not a "missing feature" as much as it's scratching an annoying itch. /Jan |