Re: [Doxygen-users] Including an image in pdf output. \includegraphics versus \image?

[Stefan P. <ste...@gm...>]

Am 19.07.2013 18:23, schrieb admsugar:
> Greg I'm not exactly understanding your answer. I'm not interested in the
> latex output at all, the only reason I am concerned with latex is because
> pdf output is generated from pdflatex. Are you suggesting that I use
> LATEX_EXTRA_FILES to pass my image file there?
>

I use >> \includegraphics{glass.png} << for LaTeX.

This allows me to use >> @image html "glass.png" <<, so I have the same 
source image for PDF and HTML output.

If you use >> @image latex "glass.eps" <<, then you need two different 
formats for your images.

doxygen doesn't use the most appropriate image format, nor does LaTeX.

I have filed an enhancement request to support any image format for 
LaTeX instead of just EPS, since the PDF creators included in LaTeX are 
capable of supporting different image formats.

See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670487 for this 
enhancement request.

Those interested in supporting any image format could add themselves to 
the ER.


--
Stefan P.

Top-posting:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?