Thread: [Doxygen-users] (no subject)
Brought to you by:
dimitri
Menu
▾
▴
doxygen-users
|
From: Trevor R. <Tre...@pe...> - 2001-05-19 01:13:27
|
FYI,
I got the following error building doxygen-1.2.7-20010517 with MS VC++ 6 on
Win2K.
cl -c -nologo -DQT_NODLL -W3 -O2 -I"..\qtools" -I"."
-Fo..\objects\language.obj language.cpp
language.cpp
translator_dk.h(338) : fatal error C1076: compiler limit : internal heap
limit reached; use /Zm to specify a higher limit
Adding "-Zm200" (which doubles the maximum) to line 145 of
src/libdoxygen.pro.in fixes the problem:
win32:TMAKE_CXXFLAGS += -DQT_NODLL -Zm200
-Trevor
|
|
From: Luigi B. <lui...@ri...> - 2001-06-14 13:18:07
|
Hi all,
I just noticed a strange behavior in version 1.2.8.1 under WinNT (I didn't
check the Linux version). When I run Doxygen through the file:
---- test.hpp ----
//! test class
class Test {
protected:
H<C> h;
};
------------------
and I turn EXTRACT_ALL on, the data member gets documented in the "detailed
description" section as:
H<C> Test::h<C> [protected]
i.e., there's a spurious <C> after the method (note that H<C> is a
specialization: C is an actual class, not a template parameter).
If I add documentation to h, either brief or detailed, the extra <C>
disappears.
Did anyone observe this before? Any light you can shed on it?
Thanks,
Luigi
|
|
From: A R <och...@ya...> - 2001-07-02 13:06:19
|
Hi. I have some troubles using doxygen. Please let me know what could be done. The problem appears when a function XXX() with the implementation in a source file has also its prototype declared in a header file (.ext in my case, but probably the same thing would be with .h). I'm browsing the source of a .c file and I click on the link for XXX() - I go to the documentation of the .ext header file where I see only the prototype (and the 'referenced by' thing) and no link from there - stuck in the .ext, I have to go back again to the old plain editor and grep. Or I can figure out what's going on and look myself for the .c file where the XXX() implementation is, but this requires a lot of clicking here and there and defeats the purpose of doxygen, to ease code browsing. So, is there a way to tell doxygen to send me to the documentation of the .c file where XXX() is implemented? I'm using doxygen 1.2.0 and 1.2.8. Thanks, Ochiosul __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: Geoff A. <gd...@us...> - 2001-07-20 17:31:36
|
When I try to search the doxygen-users mail archive at http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/11668/0/, I receive the following error: Your search for htsearch detected an error. Please report this to the returned matches webmaster of this site. The error message is: Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/11668.conf' I'm not sure who to report this to, so I thought I'd ask here if anyone knows how to search the doxygen-users mail archive. Thanks, Geoff Alexander, Ph.D. 919/254-5216 T/L 444-5216 CMVC95 WebDAV Development IBM Corporation RTP, NC |
|
From: Jose L. Z. <jlz...@ca...> - 2001-09-07 17:21:10
|
-- José Luis Zabalza jlz...@ca... Linux User 172551 |
|
From: chen b. <ch...@ya...> - 2001-11-01 09:52:14
|
I have some simple problem.
when I want to install doxygen, I met a problem. like,
[root@localhost tools]# rpm -ivh doxygen-1.2.11-1.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libfreetype.so.6 is needed by doxygen-1.2.11-1
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by doxygen-1.2.11-1
libXft.so.1 is needed by doxygen-1.2.11-1
libXrender.so.1 is needed by doxygen-1.2.11-1
so what it mean?
what should I do?
|
|
From: Judith K. <Jud...@re...> - 2001-12-20 14:14:54
|
I have just started using doxygen and am having troubles setting up the configuration file. I am editing a file which has already been commented, to give examples of 4 specific types of comment. I currently only get the output of the last comment which I add to the .h file, although each one works fine individually. I also get output from all other comments, which I do not need. Please can you help?! Judith |
|
From: chen b. <ch...@ya...> - 2002-01-09 08:35:56
|
aGmjug0Kd2hlbiBJIHNlbGVjdCBKYXBhbmFzZSBpbiB0aGUgbGFuZ3VhZ2Ugb3B0aW9uLCBJIGNh biBub3QgZ2V0IHJlYWRhYmxlDQpydGYoIHJlYWQgYnkgd29yZDIwMDAsIGF0IHdpbjIwMDAgcHJv KQ0K |
|
From: Audrey S. <as...@ul...> - 2002-01-10 12:33:56
|
How can I do to create a reference to the number of a figure for LateX documentation? =20 --------------------------------- Audrey Simon Service de m=E9canique analytique et CFAO 50, av. F.D. Roosevelt - CP 165/14 1050 Bruxelles --------------------------------- T=E9l : +32-2-650.47.66 Fax : +32-2-650.47.24 E-mail : <mailto:aud...@ul...> aud...@ul... =20 |
|
From: Paul B. <pee...@ya...> - 2002-01-16 16:03:19
|
Hi,
Basic question about Doxygen. Say I have a class
like this
---------------------------
class A
{
public:
int method1 () const {return simple_thing;}
void method2 () {do_something_simple ();}
};
---------------------------
I would like to (a) add Doxygen comments
to the methods, but (b) not
clutter up my source code with interspersed
comments.
Here is one solution, all the following is in the
header file -
------------------------------
class A
{
public:
int method1 ();
void method2 ();
};
/**
* Blah
* @return blah
*/
int A::method1 () const {return simple_thing;}
/**
* Blah2
*/
void A::method2 () {do_something_simple ();}
--------------------------------
But I have a question about inlining - will some
compilers fail to inline methods because the
definition is now separate from the declaration? i.e.
assuming method1 and method2 are inlined in the first
case above, might they be not-inlined in the second
case?
Thanks,
Paul.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
|
|
From: Viktor H. <vh...@ri...> - 2002-07-30 22:15:57
|
--
Viktor Haag : Software & Information Design : Research In Motion
+--+
"The sendmail configuration file is one of those files that
looks like someone beat their head on the keyboard."
|
|
From: Geoff A. <gd...@us...> - 2002-08-27 14:33:53
|
I have found a minor problem with the \return (and \returns) tag in which the generated paragraph header is Returns : Note the space before the colon. This is not consistent with the headers paragraph headers generated by other tags such as \param and \note, which do not include a space before the colon. I would think that the paragraph header generated by \return should be Returns: I'm running doxygen 1.2.17 using the default Doxyfile on SuSE Linux/x86 7.3. Thanks, Geoff Alexander, Ph.D. 919/254-5216 T/L 444-5216 CMVC Development IBM Corporation RTP, NC |
|
From: FOURCADE P. <pat...@ai...> - 2002-10-02 09:15:01
|
Hi !
I use doxygen to document a Java Project.
The class "master" agregate a collection of "children" classes. The java
component used for the collection is Vector. So, doxygen make a link between
master and Vector.
How can I hide this link and retrieve the link between "Master" and
"children" ( in documentation / in graph ) ?
sample :
public class Children{
}
public class Master{
//I will put here, Children instances
Vector agregate = new Vector();
}
Thanks !
|
|
From: Geoff A. <gd...@us...> - 2003-03-18 05:55:39
|
I just upgraded Doxygen from 1.2.17 to 1.3-rc3 and ran into a problem with class name links. Say that I have a class Foo and use "Foo's" in a doxygen comment. Under Doxygen 1.2.17 "Foo" within "Foo's" would be a link to the Foo Class Reference page. However, under 1.3-rc3, no such no link is created. Similarly, if I have a template class Bar<T> and use "Bar<T>" in a Doxygen comment, under 1.2.17 "Bar" within "Bar<T>" would be a link to the Bar<T> Template Class Reference page. No such link is created under 1.3-rc3. Is this change intentional? If so, how to I get "Foo's" and "Bar<T>" to link to their respective Class Reference pages? Thanks, Geoff Alexander, Ph.D. 919/254-5216 T/L 444-5216 SDWB Development IBM Corporation RTP, NC |
|
From: Chris B. <chr...@wi...> - 2003-03-19 21:40:42
Attachments:
winmail.dat
|
hi, I am looking to try a few things with doxygen, but I am not able to modify the source files. I have done some documentation outside of the files using a separate file and running that into doxygen. Can you document parameters, returns, class members, functions, defines ... outside of the source as well in a separate file? Also.. can you rearrange or make certain module grouped together under user defined headings or paragraphs? ::chris |
|
From: Chris v. <chr...@am...> - 2003-03-19 22:42:37
|
Can't you just use the special commands:
/*! \class myfoo
description of whatever myfoo is..
*/
/*! \fn void myfoo::bar(int a);
\param a An integer for something.
This function returns nothing, but takes an int.
*/
? Or did I miss something in the question?
You can group member functions at least by doing something like this:
//! \name (some section name)
//@{
...regular stuff...
//@}
- Another Chris
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Chris Barlas wrote:
> hi,
> I am looking to try a few things with doxygen, but I am not able to
> modify the source files. I have done some documentation outside of the
> files using a separate file and running that into doxygen. Can you document
> parameters, returns, class members, functions, defines ... outside of the
> source as well in a separate file?
> Also.. can you rearrange or make certain module grouped together under user
> defined headings or paragraphs?
>
> ::chris
>
>
>
|
|
From: Irene H. <Ire...@wo...> - 2004-07-09 10:42:24
|
Hi,
I am trying to group a set of #define statements, due to a general
comment for them. In addition these statements also have individual
comments. Does this cause problems?=20
I am asking because the specific comments appear in the header for the
statements in the html documentation, as well as where they are supposed
to be, and the general comment does not appear anywhere.
To clarify:
/*@{*/
/**General comment, applies to all following #define statements*/
#define xxx /**Specific comment1*/
#define yyy /**Specific comment2*/
#define etc. /**Specific commentN*/
/*@}*/
I am also having problems grouping functions in different header files.
I have tried using @defgroup in one and @addtogroup in the other header
file, also tried @addtogroup in both, as well as @defgroup in one and
@ingroup in the other.
The only output I get is for the header file in which I have used
@defgroup, even if I change this to @addtogroup.
What should I use to manage?
Thank you.
IHH=20
|
|
From: Roberto T. <rti...@3d...> - 2004-07-09 11:19:16
|
At 12.43 09/07/2004, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to group a set of #define statements, due to a general
>comment for them. In addition these statements also have individual
>comments. Does this cause problems?
>I am asking because the specific comments appear in the header for the
>statements in the html documentation, as well as where they are supposed
>to be, and the general comment does not appear anywhere.
>
>To clarify:
>/*@{*/
>/**General comment, applies to all following #define statements*/
>#define xxx /**Specific comment1*/
>#define yyy /**Specific comment2*/
>#define etc. /**Specific commentN*/
>/*@}*/
Use /**< Specific comment1 */ to assign this comment to the
specified define.
>I am also having problems grouping functions in different header files.
>I have tried using @defgroup in one and @addtogroup in the other header
>file, also tried @addtogroup in both, as well as @defgroup in one and
>@ingroup in the other.
>The only output I get is for the header file in which I have used
>@defgroup, even if I change this to @addtogroup.
>What should I use to manage?
I use @defgroup into one file and @ingroup into all functions and
parts to add to that group... but I probably misunderstood what you're
looking for...
Roberto Tirabassi.
=============================================
Roberto Tirabassi (rti...@3d...)
"I think (I doubt) therefor I am is not a reversible equation" (Descartes)
3D Informatica, S.Lazzaro di Savena, Bologna, Italy
Phone +39 051 VOICE 450844, FAX 451942
WWW -> http://www.3di.it, FTP -> ftp.3di.it
On Line Support -> http://www.3di.it/manuali/
User Support -> https://cesare.3di.it/h3/rh3/a3di_attivita/fSegnalazione
3D Informatica, Roma, Italy
Phone +39 06 8840309
WWW -> http://www.highwaytech.it
This mail is virus free due to Norton Antivirus.
============================================= |
|
From: Dimitri v. H. <di...@st...> - 2004-07-09 13:28:59
|
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Irene Higson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to group a set of #define statements, due to a general
> comment for them. In addition these statements also have individual
> comments. Does this cause problems?
> I am asking because the specific comments appear in the header for the
> statements in the html documentation, as well as where they are supposed
> to be, and the general comment does not appear anywhere.
>
> To clarify:
> /*@{*/
> /**General comment, applies to all following #define statements*/
> #define xxx /**Specific comment1*/
> #define yyy /**Specific comment2*/
> #define etc. /**Specific commentN*/
> /*@}*/
>
> I am also having problems grouping functions in different header files.
> I have tried using @defgroup in one and @addtogroup in the other header
> file, also tried @addtogroup in both, as well as @defgroup in one and
> @ingroup in the other.
> The only output I get is for the header file in which I have used
> @defgroup, even if I change this to @addtogroup.
> What should I use to manage?
Try this:
/** @name Group Header
* General comment, applies to all following #define statements*/
* @{
*/
#define xxx /**< Specific comment1 */
#define yyy /**< Specific comment2 */
#define etc. /**< Specific commentN */
/* @} */
Regards,
Dimitri
|
|
From: dari R. <my_...@ya...> - 2004-07-27 09:18:25
|
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! |
|
From: <gor...@ho...> - 2004-08-10 13:37:37
|
SGVsbG8gZG94eWdlbi11c2VycywNCg0KDQoNCkJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywgDQrQ7CCzrA0KZ29yZG9u X3h1NjZAaG90bWFpbC5jb20NCjIwMDQtMDgtMTANCg== |
|
From: Kris T. <kri...@cs...> - 2005-03-11 12:54:46
|
, and also a problem that occurs already on doxygen 1.3.9.1. Kris Thielemans (kri...@im...) Hammersmith Imanet, part of GE Healthcare Cyclotron Building Hammersmith Hospital Du Cane Road London W12 ONN, United Kingdom Phone on : +44 (020)8383 3731 FAX on : +44 (020)8383 2029 web site address: http://www.hammersmithimanet.com/~kris ------------------------------------------- NOTE: My inbox has a SPAM filter that automatically throws away suspect messages. If you expect a reply and don't get one, your message might have been wrongly classified. |
|
From: Alan D. <ala...@ps...> - 2005-03-17 14:48:44
|
Is it possible to insert arrays using doxygen? The following doesn't
work:
\f{array*}
.....
\f}
throws up a "Environment array* undefined". I thought it might be
similar to eqnarray.
Thanks in advance,
A.
----------------------------------------------------------
Alan Drew
1851 Research Fellow
School of Physics and Astronomy
University of St Andrews
North Haugh
St Andrews
Fife
Scotland
KY16 9SS
|
|
From: <xi...@ia...> - 2005-04-11 07:04:53
|
Hi=2C
When I use doxygen to create the html document in chinese=2C =
I find that a apace will be automaticaly added between two lines =
documented in different lines in source code=2EThe space is redundance=2E=
For example=3A
In source code =3A
/**
*gggggggggggggggggggggg =
*hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
*/
in html document doxygen created=3A
gggggggggggggggg hhhhhhhhhhhhhh
hhhhhhhh
I hope it is =3A
gggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhh
hhhhhhhh
note=3A
g and h is chinese word respectively=2E
=
|
|
From: Paul F. <pa...@fr...> - 2007-07-23 08:51:47
|
Hi We have a fair bit of Tcl C code in our projects. Typically, the functions will have a signature that contains Tcl_Interp *interp, int objc, Tcl_Obj *CONST objv[] Of course, nobody is interested in documenting these arguments (with @param), what is of interest are the arguments that are contained in the objv array. Does anyone have any ideas/experience of documenting such arguments that have a level of indirection? Regards Paul Floyd |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X