doxygen-users

[Doxygen-users] Template problem

[Ren G. <r.g...@ca...>]

Hi !

I have a problem in the following example.
Example:

template <typename XYZ >
class ABC : virtual public XYZ { };

Problem:

I have a class template that is derived from its template parameter "XYZ".
Doxygen makes an error and recognizes the 'XYZ' parameter as a real known
class. That's wrong because 'XYZ' is a wild card - only after the object of
ABC type is created the type of the template will be known.
Therefore it would be better, if Doxygen omits the documentation of the
template parameter 'XYZ '.

MfG
Ren=E9

Re: [Doxygen-users] Template problem

[Hendrik S. <Do...@HS...>]

Anyone out there?
(If one does some template meta programming inheriting from
a template parameter is pretty common and having all these
little unknown/undocumented dummy classes cluttering the
documentation really _is_ an annoying problem.)

Schobi


"Ren=E9 Gutschmidt" <r.g...@ca...> wrote:

> Hi !
>
> I have a problem in the following example.
> Example:
>
> template <typename XYZ >
> class ABC : virtual public XYZ { };
>
> Problem:
>
> I have a class template that is derived from its template parameter "XY=
Z".
> Doxygen makes an error and recognizes the 'XYZ' parameter as a real kno=
wn
> class. That's wrong because 'XYZ' is a wild card - only after the objec=
t of
> ABC type is created the type of the template will be known.
> Therefore it would be better, if Doxygen omits the documentation of the
> template parameter 'XYZ '.
>
> MfG
> Ren=E9

Re: [Doxygen-users] Template problem

[Dimitri v. H. <di...@st...>]

On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:46:06AM +0200, Hendrik Schober wrote:
> Anyone out there?
> (If one does some template meta programming inheriting from
> a template parameter is pretty common and having all these
> little unknown/undocumented dummy classes cluttering the
> documentation really _is_ an annoying problem.)

I agree (and am working on a fix).

Regards,
  Dimitri

Re: [Doxygen-users] Template problem

[Hendrik S. <Do...@HS...>]

"Dimitri van Heesch" <di...@st...> wrote:

> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:46:06AM +0200, Hendrik Schober wrote:
> > Anyone out there?
> > (If one does some template meta programming inheriting from
> > a template parameter is pretty common and having all these
> > little unknown/undocumented dummy classes cluttering the
> > documentation really _is_ an annoying problem.)
> 
> I agree (and am working on a fix).

  Thanks!

> Regards,
>   Dimitri

  Schobi