doxygen-users

[Doxygen-users] LaTeX environment cases: no line break

[Jannick <jan...@gm...>]

It appears the the LaTeX cases environment is not correctly compiled since
there is no line break after the first line in the pdf output, but in the
html output (using mathjax) there is.

Here an example:

\f[
x=\begin{cases}
a & \varepsilon=0\\
b & \varepsilon=1\\
c & \varepsilon=2
\end{cases}
\f]

Happy to file a bug if needed. Just give me a shout.

Many thanks.
J.

Re: [Doxygen-users] LaTeX environment cases: no line break

[Dimitri v. H. <do...@gm...>]

On 21 Dec 2013, at 14:34 , Jannick <jan...@gm...> wrote:

> It appears the the LaTeX cases environment is not correctly compiled since
> there is no line break after the first line in the pdf output, but in the
> html output (using mathjax) there is.
> 
> Here an example:
> 
> \f[
> x=\begin{cases}
> a & \varepsilon=0\\
> b & \varepsilon=1\\
> c & \varepsilon=2
> \end{cases}
> \f]
> 
> Happy to file a bug if needed. Just give me a shout.

Yes, please do, and please attach a self-contained example (source+config file in zip or tar) to the bug report 
so it easy for me to reproduce.

Regards,
  Dimitri

Re: [Doxygen-users] LaTeX environment cases: no line break

[Jannick <jan...@gm...>]

Dimitri van Heesch <doxygen <at> gmail.com> writes:

> > \f[
> > x=\begin{cases}
> > a & \varepsilon=0\\
> > b & \varepsilon=1\\
> > c & \varepsilon=2
> > \end{cases}
> > \f]
> > 
> > Happy to file a bug if needed. Just give me a shout.
> 
> Yes, please do, and please attach a self-contained example (source+config
file in zip or tar) to the bug
> report 
> so it easy for me to reproduce.

Thx for your quick reply. Meanwhile solved: LaTeX package amsmath required
which could be added as the list of standard packages I believe.

Cheers,
J.

Re: [Doxygen-users] LaTeX environment cases: no line break

[Dimitri v. H. <do...@gm...>]

On 22 Dec 2013, at 12:18 , Jannick <jan...@gm...> wrote:

> Dimitri van Heesch <doxygen <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>> \f[
>>> x=\begin{cases}
>>> a & \varepsilon=0\\
>>> b & \varepsilon=1\\
>>> c & \varepsilon=2
>>> \end{cases}
>>> \f]
>>> 
>>> Happy to file a bug if needed. Just give me a shout.
>> 
>> Yes, please do, and please attach a self-contained example (source+config
> file in zip or tar) to the bug
>> report 
>> so it easy for me to reproduce.
> 
> Thx for your quick reply. Meanwhile solved: LaTeX package amsmath required
> which could be added as the list of standard packages I believe.

Why should that be done if it is only used by your particular formula? 
Note that you can use EXTRA_PACKAGES to specify additional LaTeX packages.

Regards,
  Dimitri

Re: [Doxygen-users] LaTeX environment cases: no line break

[Jannick <jan...@gm...>]

Dimitri van Heesch <doxygen <at> gmail.com> writes:

> > Thx for your quick reply. Meanwhile solved: LaTeX package amsmath required
> > which could be added as the list of standard packages I believe.
> 
> Why should that be done if it is only used by your particular formula? 
> Note that you can use EXTRA_PACKAGES to specify additional LaTeX packages.

The EXTRA_PACKAGES feature already used, however many thanks for pointing it
out here for the benefit of other users. 

Re use of the amsmath package: Where do you know that the quoted
documentation lines are in the whole universe the only and single ones using
this feature? ;) 

I think this package is one of the basic ones for LaTeX documents with
formulae. But I can surely live with putting it into the EXTRA_PACKAGES slot.


Many thanks again and Merry Xmas,
J.

Re: [Doxygen-users] LaTeX environment cases: no line break

[Stefan P. <ste...@gm...>]

Am 23.12.2013 12:49, schrieb Jannick:
> I think this package is one of the basic ones for LaTeX documents with
> formulae.
Jannick,

... and that is the point, if you don't use formulas, you don't need it.

In my case there is no use for formulas in documentation, so why should 
I include it?

 From a developers point of view, I only include those things that are 
really always needed out of the box, for anything else I offer the 
ability to include it on demand.


--
Stefan P.

Top-posting:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

Re: [Doxygen-users] LaTeX environment cases: no line break

[Jannick <jan...@gm...>]

Stefan Pendl <stefan.pendl.71 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> Am 23.12.2013 12:49, schrieb Jannick:
> > I think this package is one of the basic ones for LaTeX documents with
> > formulae.
> Jannick,
> 
> ... and that is the point, if you don't use formulas, you don't need it.
> 
> In my case there is no use for formulas in documentation, so why should 
> I include it?
> 
>  From a developers point of view, I only include those things that are 
> really always needed out of the box, for anything else I offer the 
> ability to include it on demand.

Stefan,

to make it very clear (again - since you seem to have cut off the relevant
part from my posting): I can live pretty well with putting the additional
LaTeX package into the config slot. I believe there are better issues to
discuss than what is required by every user and what is not (Cf., e.g., the
posting a minute ago I have put on top of the archive again - here any help
or enlightening hints will be highly appreciated).

Thanks anyways.

Cheers and Merry Xmas to everyone,
J.