Here is an exchange of mails I had on the above problem, which did not
unfortunately, resolve it:
Hi Arthur
I tried removing the outer class specification, but unfortunately that did
not work, as you thought.
Well, that's not quite true - bizarrely it worked for a method with a return
type of void...but not for the other methods, don't ask me why...
Diarmuid
Hi Diarmuid;
Nope. Don't think that there is anything wrong with the statement and the
return argument (seems to) have no relevancy. Can't say that I've helped
much but here is a copydoc from my code. Seems about the same as yours
except that I'm not referencing an inner class. I suppose that you might
want to remove the outer class specification and see if that improves
things, but I don't think that that should work.
/** @copydoc SlipCellBase::remove() */
art
Hi Arthur,
Thanks for your reply.
No, I did not mean class testClassX : innerClassX.
The example I gave is direct from the code.
testClassX is not a namespace, it is a class. It is declared in a .h file.
The code I supplied is from the corresponding .cpp file.
Diarmuid
Did you mean "class testClassX : innerClassX {"? Where is the namespace
testClassX defined?
art
--
View this message in context: http://doxygen.10944.n7.nabble.com/copydoc-warning-target-of-copydoc-command-not-found-tp6345p6352.html
Sent from the Doxygen - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|