> Would anyone else like this option?
I have asked a request in -devel a couple of weeks ago, which seems to have
been ignored. However, I wonder what this entry from the last CVS announce
means:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
+ ADD: Added some logic to deal with member specializations.
They should now be added as additional members to a class instead of
being ignored and producing a warning.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Depending on the way to parse this, it could mean what we're both looking
for, or something different (I have to admit I just pipe the doxygen logs to
/dev/null for the time being)
-- Cyrille
|