doxygen-users — List for users of doxygen

RE: [Doxygen-users] has anybody seen latex problems like this?

[Prikryl,Petr <PRI...@sk...>]

Honza wrote:
> [...]
> ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [pool size=71984].
>
> I'm using doxygen 1.2.8.1 on OS X v10.1 (G4 PPC).
> LaTeX is teTeX (1.3.7?).
>
> the error shows during  first run while processing the 752nd page of the 
> refman.tex  (it is in some included file).

This probably means what it says.  I do not have that version of teTeX.
In my case (TeX Live 5), the pool size can be adjusted via modification
of the text file "TeX/Texmf-var/web2c/texmf.cnf".  If you find the file,
look for pool_size = nnnn or more specific info for your application -- like
pool_size.cslatex = nnnn.  Increase the nnnn to higher value than
stated in the error message.

Regards, 
  Petr

-- 
Petr Prikryl, SKIL, spol. s r.o., pri...@sk...

RE: [Doxygen-users] RE: MSDN look like style

[Luke M. <Luk...@sh...>]

I've stuck it up here if you want:

http://geocities.com/mad_concepts/

Cheers,
Luke

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don McClimans [mailto:dmc...@in...]
> Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2001 5:38 AM
> To: dox...@li...
> Subject: [Doxygen-users] RE: MSDN look like style
> 
> 
> I have been unable to connect to either of the URL's mentioned:
> 
>   http://c_...@c-.../html/index.html
>   http://c-a-v.chat.ru/html/index.html
> 
> Given the positive comments from others, I'd like to try it 
> out. I suspect
> others are in the same boat. Is there anyone who has gotten 
> it who could
> mirror it someplace?
> 
> TIA,
> 
> Don
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Dox...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
> 

Re: [Doxygen-users] xml

[Hunter M. <hma...@vi...>]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0200, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:26:00AM -0700, Hunter Marshall wrote:
> > I will begin working with a smaller case. Is the doxygen.dtd file in
> > doxygen-1.2.11.1/addon/xmlparse the associated DTD? 
> 
> No, it is just something that could be used as a starting point ;-)
> Any help on writing a proper DTD is highly welcomed.

After playing with xsl/fop, I think that maybe the DTD structure might
be an area for experimentation. For example, I am finding that the
numbering control in XSLT (<xsl:number>) does not go outside a
sequence of sibling nodes. I suppose some cool XSL hacker could do
it. It's not like LaTeX where you can tap your own custom counter when
you want the next number value in a sequence.

What I mean is that the numbering works well for something like

chap
 sec
  subsec
  subsec
 sec
  subsec
chap
 sec
  subsec

Whereas the doxygen DTD (at a highlevel) looks like

compounddef
 compoundname
 sectiondef
  memberdef (the dtd and the output differ on this)
  memberdef
  memberdef
 sectiondef
  memberdef
 detaileddescriptio

I don't have any suggestions yet. I am just now realizing the impact
of DTD design on the ease of processing. 

	hunter

PS Should this go to doxygen-develop? Or to a smaller group than
doxygen-users?

[Doxygen-users] RE: MSDN look like style

[Don M. <dmc...@in...>]

I have been unable to connect to either of the URL's mentioned:

  http://c_...@c-.../html/index.html
  http://c-a-v.chat.ru/html/index.html

Given the positive comments from others, I'd like to try it out. I suspect
others are in the same boat. Is there anyone who has gotten it who could
mirror it someplace?

TIA,

Don

Re: [Doxygen-users] has anybody seen latex problems like this?

[<jan...@co...>]

Can some thing be added to the TODO list?

I would like to see there "Shortening of LaTeX references."
The LaTeX is getting out of the pool (the reference / command pool) too 
soon.
Can there be a counter of references?
To be able troubleshoot the things around references.
1) how many places are referenced -total.
2) how many times is the referenced place used.

Thanks

Honza

[Doxygen-users] has anybody seen latex problems like this?

[<jan...@co...>]

when I try to run  make on latex documentation
the LaTeX is screaming :

! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [pool size=71984].

I'm using doxygen 1.2.8.1 on OS X v10.1 (G4 PPC).
LaTeX is teTeX (1.3.7?).

the error shows during  first run while processing the 752nd page of the 
refman.tex  (it is in some included file).

Before that there are only some underfull/overfull  errors and few 
reference
  undefined warnings.
I know that those don't have any influence.

Thanks for any help.

Honza

Re: [Doxygen-users] related pages question

[Volker B. <boe...@we...>]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Stephan Stapel wrote:

> Maybe I'm just too blind, but can you please tell me how to insert a custom
> page into the 'Related pages' section (html generated docs)?

Everything inside a /** @page mypage Title of Mypage ... */
will show up in the Related Pages section.

Make sure that the page is contained in a proper C++-comment and the file
is seen by doxygen (adjust the INPUT section of the configuration).

Regards,
Volker
-- 
Volker Boerchers, boe...@we...

[Doxygen-users] related pages question

[Stephan S. <st...@sc...>]

Hi there!

Maybe I'm just too blind, but can you please tell me how to insert a custom
page into the 'Related pages' section (html generated docs)?
If this should not be the correct way to plug-in handmade html docs, where
do I have to put them else?

cheers,

Stephan

RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.

[Luke M. <Luk...@sh...>]

I got the patch off Alexandr Chelpanov.  Very nice work indeed!

Cheers,
Luke

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Freudenberg, Thomas [mailto:tho...@cy...]
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 October 2001 11:16 PM
> To: dox...@li...
> Subject: FW: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I have tried it, and it looks very nice! Great work.
>=20
> But it took some time, until I got the expected result. I
> am using customized files for header.html, footer.html and=20
> cascading style sheets. I even tried to regenerate them
> w/ doxygen -w html ..., but I thinks you didn't updated
> them ;-) . Nevermind, after I deleted the approriate tags
> in the configuration file doxygen produced the documentation
> in this nice MSDN style.
>=20
> BTW, there seems to be a bug. You have implemented these
> tables with documented members. For some items, the
> description cell (the second colum) is grayed with no text
> in it, although these items are documented.
>=20
> However, I like the MSDN look and hope, your patch will be
> integrated in the 'standard' doxygen.=20
>=20
> Once again: great work!
>=20
> Regards,
> Thomas
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dox...@li...=20
> Sent: Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2001 20:37
> To: Doxygen Users Conference (=FCI. DI_OA)
> Subject: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style. (MID=3D2459164)
>=20
>=20
> 	Hi, Doxygen developers & users.
> 	If some one interested in MSDN look like style DOXYGEN=20
> I'd like to present some samples, patch, win32 version of=20
> doxygen at http://c_...@c-.../html/index.html
> 	Thanks, Chelpanov Alexandr.
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Dox...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Dox...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
>=20

RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.

[Freudenberg, T. <tho...@cy...>]

I have verified the issues I stated in my previous mail.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Freudenberg, Thomas
> Sent: Monday, 22. October 2001 11:19
> To: 'dox...@li...'
> Subject: RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.
> 
> [...]
> 
> BTW, there seems to be a bug. You have implemented these tables with 
> documented members. For some items, the description cell (the second 
> colum) is grayed with no text in it, although these items are 
> documented.

I have to precise that statement. The cells are grayed for
(indeed) undocumented members as well as overloaded functions. I would
suggest to insert a short text in italics, e.g. (undocumented) or
(overloaded). 

Additionally, I noticed that the documentation of enums are always bolds.

Regards,
Thomas

FW: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.

[Freudenberg, T. <tho...@cy...>]

I have tried it, and it looks very nice! Great work.

But it took some time, until I got the expected result. I
am using customized files for header.html, footer.html and =

cascading style sheets. I even tried to regenerate them
w/ doxygen -w html ..., but I thinks you didn't updated
them ;-) . Nevermind, after I deleted the approriate tags
in the configuration file doxygen produced the documentation
in this nice MSDN style.

BTW, there seems to be a bug. You have implemented these
tables with documented members. For some items, the
description cell (the second colum) is grayed with no text
in it, although these items are documented.

However, I like the MSDN look and hope, your patch will be
integrated in the 'standard' doxygen. =


Once again: great work!

Regards,
Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: dox...@li... =

Sent: Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2001 20:37
To: Doxygen Users Conference (=FCI. DI_OA)
Subject: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style. (MID=3D2459164)


	Hi, Doxygen developers & users.
	If some one interested in MSDN look like style DOXYGEN I'd like to prese=
nt some samples, patch, win32 version of doxygen at http://c_...@c-...=
at.ru/html/index.html
	Thanks, Chelpanov Alexandr.

_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Dox...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users

RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.

[Freudenberg, T. <tho...@cy...>]

I think the problem is a typo in the URL. It should
be http://c-a-v.chat.ru/html/index.html.

Regards,
Thomas


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dox...@li...
> Sent: Monday, 22 October, 2001 9:16
> To: Doxygen Users Conference (??. ?????)
> Subject: RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style. (MID=2460153)
> 
> 
> Sounds great!  Though I seem to be having trouble accessing
> the site.  Can anyone else get there?
> 
> Cheers,
> Luke
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ca...@Cr... [mailto:ca...@Cr...]
> > Sent: Monday, 22 October 2001 4:18 AM
> > To: Doxygen Users Conference (??. ?????)
> > Subject: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.
> > 
> > 
> > 	Hi, Doxygen developers & users.
> > 	If some one interested in MSDN look like style DOXYGEN
> I'd like to
> > present some samples, patch, win32 version of doxygen at 
> > http://c_...@c-.../html/index.html
> > 	Thanks, Chelpanov Alexandr.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Doxygen-users mailing list Dox...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list Dox...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
> 

[Doxygen-users] xml processsing

[Hunter M. <hma...@vi...>]

OK, so it hit me that another way to process the xml output would be
to map doxygen xml to docbook xml (via XSL). Plus it turns out that
there are many programming specific items in the docbook dtd.

http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/documentation/reference/html/ch02.html
section 2.5.7.6 "Programming languages and Constructs"

I am not sure which direction I will start with. Just wanted to
mention this to see if anyone had experience or interest.

	hunter

[Doxygen-users] Best way to create "info" doc from Doxygen output ?

[Sebastien B. <seb...@ba...>]

Hi

Sorry if this topic has already been discussed, but the "info" word is so 
common that I would have no luck by searching in the Mailing lists 
(furthermore, the search engine at GeoCrawler is dead).

What is the best way to create a set of "info" files from Doxygen output ?
	- Latex to 'info' (texinfo) ?
	- 'man' to 'info' (man2info) ?

Basically I would like to be able to read my doc within Emacs.

Thank you 

RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.

[<ca...@Cr...>]

	I didn't want to send 1.7M to the conference and I havn't site
space in internet but Russia. If some one can't get it, I can send 1.7M
by mail, or upload this site. Notify if you want.
	Thanks. Alexandr Chelpanov.

-----Original Message-----
From: Luke Marshall [mailto:Luk...@sh...]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Doxygen Users Conference (??. ?????)
Subject: RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.


Sounds great!  Though I seem to be having trouble accessing the site.
Can
anyone else get there?

Cheers,
Luke

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ca...@Cr... [mailto:ca...@Cr...]
> Sent: Monday, 22 October 2001 4:18 AM
> To: Doxygen Users Conference (??. ?????)
> Subject: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.
>=20
>=20
> 	Hi, Doxygen developers & users.
> 	If some one interested in MSDN look like style DOXYGEN I'd like
> to present
> some samples, patch, win32 version of doxygen at
> http://c_...@c-.../html/index.html
> 	Thanks, Chelpanov Alexandr.
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Dox...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
>=20

_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Dox...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users

RE: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.

[Luke M. <Luk...@sh...>]

Sounds great!  Though I seem to be having trouble accessing the site.  Can
anyone else get there?

Cheers,
Luke

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ca...@Cr... [mailto:ca...@Cr...]
> Sent: Monday, 22 October 2001 4:18 AM
> To: Doxygen Users Conference (??. ?????)
> Subject: [Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.
> 
> 
> 	Hi, Doxygen developers & users.
> 	If some one interested in MSDN look like style DOXYGEN I'd like
> to present
> some samples, patch, win32 version of doxygen at
> http://c_...@c-.../html/index.html
> 	Thanks, Chelpanov Alexandr.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Dox...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users
> 

[Doxygen-users] MSDN look like style.

[<ca...@Cr...>]

	Hi, Doxygen developers & users.
	If some one interested in MSDN look like style DOXYGEN I'd like
to present
some samples, patch, win32 version of doxygen at
http://c_...@c-.../html/index.html
	Thanks, Chelpanov Alexandr.

[Doxygen-users] Doxygen-1.2.11-20011021 in CVS

[Dimitri v. H. <di...@st...>]

Hi,

Changed in this week's release:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ CHG: The list of all members of a class now shows for each member,
       the class in which the member is defined.
+ ADD: Included updates for translations to Chinese (thanks to Charlie Liu)
       Slovene (thanks to Matjaz Ostroversnik) and Russian
       (thanks to Alexandr Chelpanov).
+ ADD: Include update for translator.pl
+ BUG: References to groups defined in tag files did not work.
+ BUG: documentation for classes inside namespaces was generated multiple
       times.
+ BUG: Running doxytag on qt-3.0.0 resulted in a tag file containing
       non-breakable spaces.
+ BUG: The \package statement did not work correctly for packages whose name
       contained a dot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enjoy,
  Dimitri

RE: [Doxygen-users] xml

[Marc B. <be...@ro...>]

RE: DTDs versus schemas

I find writing schemas rather tedious because of their verboseness, although
as was previously pointed out they are more powerful than DTDs. Since I know
DTD syntax, which is arcane but nicely succinct, I write a DTD first that
encompasses the basic element structure I want and use a tool to convert the
DTD to an XML schema. Then I embellish the schema. One tool for converting
between DTDs and schemas is called XML Authority, although no doubt there
are others.

Marc Betz
Documentation Systems Engineer
Rogue Wave Software, Inc.
541 754 3272 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Steiner [mailto:pet...@hu...]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:15 AM
To: dox...@li...
Subject: Re: [Doxygen-users] xml


On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:27:16 +0200, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

> If you know any (preferable non-Java) open-source tools that can
> validate XML schema 1.0 docs please let me know.

I don't know details (never used schema myself), but Xerces C++ has
experimental Schema support. More details at
http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/schema.html

Regards, Peter
-- 
    _   _        Peter Steiner <pet...@hu...>
  / /_/ /        Hug-Witschi AG <http://www.hugwi.ch/>
 /  _  /         Electronic Engineering
/_/ /_/  _   _   Industriestrasse 12
   / / / / / /   CH-3178 Boesingen
  / /_/ /_/ /    Tel  +41 31 740 44 44
 /_ _ _ _ _/     Fax  +41 31 740 44 45


_______________________________________________
Doxygen-users mailing list
Dox...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users

Re: [Doxygen-users] Non-alphabetical sort of methodes, attributes

[Christopher B. <bre...@ya...>]

Let me add a similar question. For various overloaded
variants of methods, the class summary shows them in
the order that they appear in the source. But the
expanded text shows them in another order. I don't see
what determines this order. I would like it to be the
source order in both places.

Christopher Brewster

--- Holger Danske <hol...@ya...> wrote:
> Hallo Users.
> 
> I've the following problem. All list generated by
> Doxygen  are sorted aphabetical.
> List of the packages, class hierachy, compound list.
> Also the detail view of the classes are sorted
> alphabetical. Only the overview of the methodes and
> attribute of an class in unsorted. I mean the list
> of
> the public methodes, static public methodes, static
> public attributes and so on. And I can't find out
> why
> it doesn't work.
> 
> Is it a bug, a feature?
> Can i find some property to sort this choice or are
> there any trick.
> 
> TIA 
> JD
> 
>
__________________________________________________________________
> 
> Es ist soweit: das Nokia Game beginnt. Sei bereit
> für das multimediale Abenteuer. Melde dich bis zum
> 3. November bei
> http://de.promotions.yahoo.com/info/nokiagame an!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Doxygen-users mailing list
> Dox...@li...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com

[Doxygen-users] Graphical Class Hierarchy

[Christian L. <cla...@po...>]

Is there a way to have he graphical class hierarchy be the default to show up 
when someone clicks on 'class hierarchy' at the top of a page using the 
standard header?

-- 
Christian Lavoie
cla...@po...
chr...@nu...

[Doxygen-users] Non-alphabetical sort of methodes, attributes

[<hol...@ya...>]

Hallo Users.

I've the following problem. All list generated by
Doxygen  are sorted aphabetical.
List of the packages, class hierachy, compound list.
Also the detail view of the classes are sorted
alphabetical. Only the overview of the methodes and
attribute of an class in unsorted. I mean the list of
the public methodes, static public methodes, static
public attributes and so on. And I can't find out why
it doesn't work.

Is it a bug, a feature?
Can i find some property to sort this choice or are
there any trick.

TIA 
JD

__________________________________________________________________

Es ist soweit: das Nokia Game beginnt. Sei bereit für das multimediale Abenteuer. Melde dich bis zum 3. November bei http://de.promotions.yahoo.com/info/nokiagame an!

[Doxygen-users] Collaboration diagram suggestion

[Morgenthaler, G. <g.m...@vi...>]

Hi,

I would like to suggest to move the collaboration diagram to a
seperate page and offer a link from the class refrence page(like
the graphical class hierarchy diagram from the class hierarchy page).

It's good to have the collaboration diagram but IMHO it sucks
at its current location. If one wants only to look up some member
function the diagram is unnecessarily loaded and must scrolled by
every time (and those diagrams sometimes tend to get big).

If there are opinions against this suggestion maybe another config
option (YACO ;-) would be a solution... (like INLINE_SOURCES of
the source browser feature).

Comments?

Regards, Germar

Re: [Doxygen-users] xml

[Peter S. <pet...@hu...>]

On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:27:16 +0200, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

> If you know any (preferable non-Java) open-source tools that can
> validate XML schema 1.0 docs please let me know.

I don't know details (never used schema myself), but Xerces C++ has
experimental Schema support. More details at
http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/schema.html

Regards, Peter
-- 
    _   _        Peter Steiner <pet...@hu...>
  / /_/ /        Hug-Witschi AG <http://www.hugwi.ch/>
 /  _  /         Electronic Engineering
/_/ /_/  _   _   Industriestrasse 12
   / / / / / /   CH-3178 Boesingen
  / /_/ /_/ /    Tel  +41 31 740 44 44
 /_ _ _ _ _/     Fax  +41 31 740 44 45

Re: [Doxygen-users] xml

[Christian H. <ch...@po...>]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0200, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
> My priorities w.r.t. XML are:
> 1) get all the information collected by doxygen in the XML output.

Though I haven't had time lately, I've been planning on writing
another patch to get more info generated in the XML, and also to
provide a config option for generating multiple XML files, just like
with HTML files.

I'll send it when I get a chance to finish it.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond         <>  The GNUpdate Project
ch...@po...  <>  http://www.gnupdate.org/
   Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs.