doxygen-users Mailing List for Doxygen (Page 534)
Brought to you by:
dimitri
You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(118) |
Jun
(150) |
Jul
(115) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(102) |
Nov
(139) |
Dec
(87) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(131) |
Feb
(60) |
Mar
(114) |
Apr
(83) |
May
(125) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(95) |
Aug
(98) |
Sep
(109) |
Oct
(97) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(70) |
2003 |
Jan
(117) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(187) |
Apr
(114) |
May
(154) |
Jun
(131) |
Jul
(130) |
Aug
(98) |
Sep
(121) |
Oct
(107) |
Nov
(80) |
Dec
(54) |
2004 |
Jan
(78) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(118) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(164) |
Aug
(104) |
Sep
(101) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(107) |
Dec
(98) |
2005 |
Jan
(75) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(107) |
Apr
(114) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(106) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(108) |
Sep
(115) |
Oct
(140) |
Nov
(128) |
Dec
(63) |
2006 |
Jan
(86) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(125) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(143) |
Jul
(99) |
Aug
(91) |
Sep
(93) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(45) |
2007 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(97) |
Mar
(125) |
Apr
(112) |
May
(65) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(82) |
Aug
(84) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(63) |
Dec
(74) |
2008 |
Jan
(161) |
Feb
(115) |
Mar
(58) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(79) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(115) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(62) |
Nov
(93) |
Dec
(37) |
2009 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(115) |
Mar
(77) |
Apr
(85) |
May
(124) |
Jun
(58) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(90) |
Oct
(80) |
Nov
(87) |
Dec
(48) |
2010 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(84) |
Aug
(68) |
Sep
(94) |
Oct
(66) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(53) |
2011 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(59) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(76) |
Jun
(54) |
Jul
(95) |
Aug
(92) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(60) |
2012 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(121) |
May
(81) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(97) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(60) |
2013 |
Jan
(85) |
Feb
(70) |
Mar
(81) |
Apr
(83) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(71) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(28) |
2014 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(59) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(17) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(24) |
2015 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(57) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(50) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(66) |
Sep
(59) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(12) |
2016 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(6) |
2017 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(6) |
2018 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(7) |
2019 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(5) |
2020 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
2022 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2023 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(5) |
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
From: Glenn M. <gle...@vo...> - 2002-02-05 17:26:28
|
Try putting in html syntax instead. <b>group of words</b>. Glenn Maxey Technical Writer Voyant Technologies, Inc. 1765 West 121st Avenue Westminster, CO 80234-2301 Tel. +1 303.223.5164 Fax. +1 303.223.5275 gle...@vo... > -----Original Message----- > From: GF...@at... [mailto:GF...@at...] > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:39 AM > To: dox...@li... > Subject: [Doxygen-users] emphasizing multiple words >=20 >=20 > Hi Goyz & Girlz, >=20 > Perhaps someone can help me. (i.e. point me to the correct=20 > page in the > documentation because I'm blind) I am trying to emphasize a=20 > group of words > (lets call it a sentence), but the only tag I can see for this type of > thing would be the @b or \b tag. Unfortunatly this tag only=20 > emphersizes > the 1st word. Does anyone know if there is a mehtod (other=20 > then putting @b > before each word) to do this? >=20 > Thanks, > Grahame Falvey > Atronic International GmbH >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Doxygen-users mailing list > Dox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users >=20 |
From: <GF...@at...> - 2002-02-05 16:39:24
|
Hi Goyz & Girlz, Perhaps someone can help me. (i.e. point me to the correct page in the documentation because I'm blind) I am trying to emphasize a group of words (lets call it a sentence), but the only tag I can see for this type of thing would be the @b or \b tag. Unfortunatly this tag only emphersizes the 1st word. Does anyone know if there is a mehtod (other then putting @b before each word) to do this? Thanks, Grahame Falvey Atronic International GmbH |
From: Prikryl,Petr <PRI...@sk...> - 2002-02-05 08:22:10
|
Info on the status of the language translators (February 5th, 2002) (Related to the Doxygen-1.2.13-20020203 in CVS; full translator_report.txt included in the attached zip file. Posted to doxygen-develop [for the language maintainers], copy posted to doxygen-users [searching for Finnish and Swedish language maintainers].) Hi, First of all, my special thanks to all language maintainers. ----------------------------------------------- We are still searching for Finnish and Swedish maintainers because their translators became extremely obsolete. ----------------------------------------------- The attached traslator_report.txt shows the current status of the Translator classes. Here is an excerpt that can help you to guess how much work it would require to make your language translator up-to-date. Notice, that the translator.pl script now shows also what required methods are implemented by what translators: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The following translator classes are up-to-date (sorted alphabetically). This means that they derive from the Translator class. Anyway, there still may be some details listed even for the up-to-date translators. Please, check the text below if the translator is marked so. TranslatorBrazilian TranslatorCroatian TranslatorCzech TranslatorDutch TranslatorEnglish TranslatorFrench TranslatorItalian TranslatorRussian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The following translator classes are obsolete (sorted alphabetically). This means that they derive from some of the adapter classes. TranslatorChinese (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_13) TranslatorDanish (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_7) TranslatorGerman (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_13) TranslatorGreek (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_11) TranslatorHungarian (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_1) TranslatorJapanese (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_13) TranslatorKorean (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_13) TranslatorNorwegian (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_2) TranslatorPolish (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_1) TranslatorPortuguese (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_13) TranslatorRomanian (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_1) TranslatorSlovak (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_13) TranslatorSlovene (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_13) TranslatorSpanish (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_7) TranslatorUkrainian (TranslatorAdapter_1_2_11) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The following translator classes are implemented via deriving from the English translator. This should be done only in the case when the language maintainer or the doxygen developers need to update some really outdated translator. Otherwise, deriving from the translator adapter classes should be prefered for obsolete translators. See details below in the report. TranslatorFinnish (TranslatorEnglish) TranslatorSwedish (TranslatorEnglish) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The following translator adapter classes are implemented -- the older (with lower number) are always derived from the newer. They implement the listed required methods. Notice that some versions of doxygen did not introduce any changes related to the language translators. From here you may guess how much work should be done to update your translator: TranslatorAdapter_1_2_13 implements 2 required methods... QCString trImplementedFromList(int numEntries) QCString trImplementedInList(int numEntries) TranslatorAdapter_1_2_11 implements 1 required method... QCString trReferences() TranslatorAdapter_1_2_7 implements 1 required method... QCString trAuthor(bool first_capital, bool singular) TranslatorAdapter_1_2_6 implements 13 required methods... QCString trRTFansicp() QCString trRTFCharSet() QCString trRTFGeneralIndex() QCString trFile(bool first_capital, bool singular) QCString latexLanguageSupportCommand() QCString idLanguageCharset() QCString trClass(bool first_capital, bool singular) QCString trNamespace(bool first_capital, bool singular) QCString trGroup(bool first_capital, bool singular) QCString trPage(bool first_capital, bool singular) QCString trMember(bool first_capital, bool singular) QCString trField(bool first_capital, bool singular) QCString trGlobal(bool first_capital, bool singular) TranslatorAdapter_1_2_5 implements 2 required methods... QCString trBug() QCString trBugList() TranslatorAdapter_1_2_4 implements 8 required methods... QCString trInterfaces() QCString trClasses() QCString trPackage(const char *name) QCString trPackageList() QCString trPackageListDescription() QCString trPackages() QCString trPackageDocumentation() QCString trDefineValue() TranslatorAdapter_1_2_2 implements 2 required methods... QCString trProperties() QCString trPropertyDocumentation() TranslatorAdapter_1_2_1 implements 1 required method... QCString trDCOPMethods() ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Clearly, to pass the 1.2.4 and 1.2.6 translator adapters requires more work. Anyway, their methods are not extremely difficult to implement. If you find some time, please do update your translator. The comming-soon work on the new implementation of translators would otherwise be more difficult for those who develop the core code. Thanks, Petr -- Petr Prikryl, Skil, spol. s r.o., (pri...@sk...) |
From: Francois St-A. <fst...@do...> - 2002-02-04 16:24:46
|
All, =20 Is there anyway to deactivate the generation of the Class Hierarchy (hierarchy.html) and File List (files.html) files and corresponding = links at the top of every HTML file using a Doxyfile setting? Or is = post-processing the only way to achieve this? =20 Regards, =20 Fran=E7ois St-Arnaud =20 |
From: Toni M. <ton...@wa...> - 2002-02-04 00:01:04
|
Hi. My LaTeX output is saying me something like this: ! LaTeX Error: Too deeply nested. =20 See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. Type H <return> for immediate help. ... =20 l.49 \begin{CompactItemize} =20 ? The html output is ok. who can avoid this error ? --=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Toni Moreno Gim=E9nez =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Pje de las rosas n=BA 22 Vilassar de Mar=20 (Barcelona) Espa=F1a CP: 08340 |
From: Dimitri v. H. <di...@st...> - 2002-02-03 11:10:08
|
Hi, In this week's release the following has changed: ----------------------------------------------------------------- + CHG: Doxygen now filters out duplicate input files. + ADD: If a comment block contains at least one @param command, doxygen now produces warnings if not all parameters of a function are documented or if the names of the parameters do not match the argumentlist. (Please report any false alarms). + ADD: Included language updates for Czech, French, Italian, Brazilian, Russian + BUG: Doxygen now exits with code 0 if there is no error (previously it returned 1 in some cases were no error occurred). + BUG: Calling "doxygen -g -" now writes the config file to stdout (this already worked when using "doxygen -g-"). + BUG: Undocumented classes exposed when setting EXTRACT_ALL to YES, could result in broken links in the class hierarchy. + BUG: Fixed parser problem for function typedefs inside classes. + BUG: Exception specifications in Java were not parsed properly. + BUG: If INLINE_INHERITED_MEMB was YES, pure vitual members of base classes reachable via multiple paths appeared more than once in the documentation. + BUG: Removed potential recursive loop when computing reimplements relations for template instances. + BUG: Fixed argument matching problem when matching "a<int *>" with a<int * >" + BUG: Links in the documentation of grouped namespace members were not pointing to the group but to the namespace. + BUG: For template specializations the title of an html page contained plain < and > characters. + BUG: When computing source references undocumented members could introduce non-existing relations for documented members in front of it. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Enjoy, Dimitri |
From: Alexander S. <Ale...@co...> - 2002-02-01 19:00:35
|
Hi all, first of all thank you for such a great tool like doxygen! But ... ;-) I still have a problem showing the document tree in mozilla 0.9.7. It seems like the elements have been disarranged. Please have a look at the attachement, which shows the upper left corner of an entire mozilla brower window with the questionable part. Is this (wrong) layout caused by mozilla itsself? Or is the code generated by doxygen wrong? Are there any workarounds or fixes? Thank you in advance. Regards, Alexander Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Speetzen Communication Networks, Aachen University of Technology; Phone: ++49-241-8027954, Fax: ++49-241-8022242; mailto:Ale...@Sp... | mailto:sp...@co... http://www.speetzen.de, | http://www.comnets.rwth-aachen.de/~spee |
From: Matt W. <Mat...@sp...> - 2002-02-01 14:13:11
|
Hi all! I'm trying to generate pdf documents from the latex generated by = doxygen. I can generate the docs fine. However, links to the source = files do not work properly. I took a look at refman.log and found the = following ! pdfTeX warning (dest): name{qw_8c-source} has been referenced but does = not ex ist, replaced by a fixed one This would explain why the link to the source file doesn't work. Is = this a bug or is there something I am doing incorrectly? Thanks, Matt Matthew E. Wolf=20 [ Applications Engineer, Government Wireless ] Spectrum Signal Processing, Inc. t 301.459.8888 x18 // f 301.459.8887 <http://www.spectrumsignal.com> > Confidential information may be contained in this message.=20 > If you are not the addressee indicated in this message please=20 > destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. >=20 |
From: Francis M. <fra...@so...> - 2002-02-01 08:56:35
|
Hoi, This is probably a standard question. I'd like to disable doxygen processing for parts of a source file. I tried something like this already: In the INI file I've added ALIASES = "doxoff=@ifnot SKIP_DOX" \ "doxon=@endif" ENABLED_SECTIONS = SKIP_DOX A source file could look like this: /// @doxoff source code comes here /// @doxon It does not work however. Does somebody have another solution? Thx --- Kind regards, francis meyvis Sony Software Development Center - Europe +32 2 724 8 643, Sint StevensWoluwestraat 55, B1130 Brussels, Belgium |
From: Rod O. <oll...@SE...> - 2002-01-31 16:49:43
|
There are two settings in the configuration file that may assist you: MAX_DOT_GRAPH_WIDTH and MAX_DOT_GRAPH_HEIGHT However, if limiting the size of the generated graphs is not an option for you, you can at least open the graph using an image viewer which supports much larger image sizes. I use S-PicView which can be found at http://www.yukudr.com/imageviewer/. Regards, Rod Ollerhead "John H. Bergman" wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using Doxygen for a while now, and really have grown to love it.. NICE WORK > GUYS! And now that the GraphViz guys have released an update for windows that fixes the > line problem... even better! > > I do have a small problem and am seeking quidance about how to correct it. My project > has gotten so complex that the chart that is generated for the class tree is so large that > IE 6 (and 5.x) will not display one of the GIF files. Has anyone else had this problem? How > do you get around it? > > Also, I have broken the project up into components, and those generate really well. How > do you take the components and merge them together? I'd like to avoid running the how doxygen > on the full set of code for this? > > John > > _______________________________________________ > Doxygen-users mailing list > Dox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users |
From: Prikryl,Petr <PRI...@sk...> - 2002-01-31 07:24:26
|
Hi, Alain wrote... > On every line of the first part of the generated page > for a specific class, I can see my brief description > followed by "more..." with a link to the documentation > part, but with no more information than this brief > description... While I am not using only the brief descriptions, I have also noticed that the "more..." is somehow redundant, sometimes. For example, in the list of methods, the "more..." points to the same place as the method identifier. The question is whether it cannot be removed from here. On the other hand, it could be replaced by something like "(Detailed description.)" where it points to the detailed description. (But it should be discussed by more users.) In the Czech translation, I could not find the word that would look well in all situations. Because of that, I put only the "..." string inside the Czech translator. The side effect is that it looks better in the cases mentioned by Alain. The minus is that it is less visible. But, frankly, I am not using this kind of link very often. Petr -- Petr Prikryl, Skil, spol. s r.o., (pri...@sk...) |
From: Stephane R. <ste...@sy...> - 2002-01-31 00:41:17
|
Hi, I just downloaded the new release of dot for win32. I've seen that some problems are solved ( text doesn't fit the rectangle = ). But the "clickable areas" are wrong ( you need to click outside the = rectangle to have the link ). Is it a problem with doxygen or with dot ? Who generates this areas ? Thanks, Stephane |
From: John H. B. <jo...@zo...> - 2002-01-31 00:06:31
|
Hi, I've been using Doxygen for a while now, and really have grown to love = it.. NICE WORK=20 GUYS! And now that the GraphViz guys have released an update for = windows that fixes the line problem... even better! I do have a small problem and am seeking quidance about how to correct = it. My project has gotten so complex that the chart that is generated for the class = tree is so large that IE 6 (and 5.x) will not display one of the GIF files. Has anyone else = had this problem? How do you get around it? Also, I have broken the project up into components, and those generate = really well. How do you take the components and merge them together? I'd like to avoid = running the how doxygen on the full set of code for this? John |
From: Alain R. <are...@ya...> - 2002-01-30 23:33:51
|
I only use brief descriptions... On every line of the first part of the generated page for a specific class, I can see my brief description followed by "more..." with a link to the documentation part, but with no more information than this brief description... How can I avoid to see ths "more..." when there is no need to follow the link. Thanks __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com |
From: Glenn M. <gle...@vo...> - 2002-01-30 21:23:35
|
Hi all, I'm having problems developing a special-case scheme to keep doxygen comments separate from the source files. I've gotten this to work for functions (@fn) by supplying the exact prototype.=20 I have not made this work for enumerations (@enum) or typedef's (@typedef); it doesn't match on short definitions (@typedef enum BOGUS) or on long definitions (@typedef enum BOGUS {one=3D1; two=3D2} BOGUS;) = that try to put in the exact syntax on one line. (We are using the "typedef enum" syntax.) The long definitions are also cumbersome. Why do I have this problem? Our developers do a lot of code generation. This means that the input files to Doxygen sometimes are generated from one or more source files by one or more other tools first. Those tools do not pass comments through. I would normally be exploring updating the tools to pass the comments through, but we don't have control over all of the code generation tools. My goal is to get comments closer to the source code so that they remain up-to-date and accurate. Right now, I have the information in FrameMaker that gets exported into the HTML system. Doxgyen exports prototypes into the HTML system, but there is nothing that tells you about the code item. If you happen to find it using the index, you'll see both references and get all needed info. If you access through the doxygen portion alone, you'll be left hanging (what is this?) Any ideas on how I can still get the syntax accuracy of Doxgyen together with the detailed descriptions? Glenn Maxey Technical Writer Voyant Technologies, Inc. 1765 West 121st Avenue Westminster, CO 80234-2301 Tel. +1 303.223.5164 Fax. +1 303.223.5275 gle...@vo... |
From: chen b. <ch...@ya...> - 2002-01-28 09:38:48
|
DQotLS0tLSBPcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tIA0KRnJvbTogImNoZW4gYmluIiA8Y2hiX3No QHlhaG9vLmNvbS5jbj4NClRvOiA8ZG94eWdlbi11c2Vyc0BsaXN0cy5zb3VyY2Vmb3JnZS5uZXQ+ DQpTZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIEphbnVhcnkgMTYsIDIwMDIgNDoyMSBQTQ0KU3ViamVjdDogcnRm IG91dHB1dCBOT1Qgc3VwcG9ydCBPTkUgY29tcGxldGUgR2xvYmFscyBpbmRleD8gYnV0IGh0bWwg T0shDQoNCg0KPiBQcm9ibGVtOg0KPiAqKioqKioqKg0KPiBJIG91dHB1dCB0aGUgaHRtbCBkb2N1 bWVudCBhbmQgcnRmIGRvY3VtZW50IGF0IHRoZSBzYW1lIHRpbWUuDQo+IGJ1dCBydGYgZG8gbm90 IHByb2R1Y2UgR2xvYmFscyhJIG1lYW4gZ2xvYmFsIGZ1bmN0aW9ucyBhbmQgdmFyaWFibGVzLi4u KSANCj4gaW5kZXghDQo+IA0KPiBidXQgaHRtbCB2ZXJzaW9uIGRvIGl0Lg0KPiANCj4gSSBtZWFu IHJ0ZiBwcm9kdWNlIHRoZSBnbG9iYWxzIGluZGV4IGZvciBFVkVSWSBmaWxlKGZvciBleGFtcGxl LCBtYWluLmMpLA0KPiBidXQgSSBhbHNvIHdhbnQgYSBDT01QTEVURSBnbG9iYWxzIGluZGV4IGZv ciB0aGUgd2hvbGUgcHJvamVjdC4NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBJIGNoZWNrZWQgdGhlIGRveHl3aXphcmQn cyBHZW5lcmFsIHRhYidzIG9wdGlvbnMgYnV0IG5vIGlkZWEuDQo+IA0KPiBFbnZpcm9ubWVudDoN Cj4gKioqKioqKioqKioqDQo+IERveHlnZW4gdmVyc2lvbiAxLjIuMTMuMTsNCj4gb24gVHVyYm9s aW51eCBTZXJ2ZXIgNi41Ow0KPiBFbmdsaXNoIGxhbmd1YWdlIHJ0ZiBvdXRwdXQ7DQo+IA0KPiB0 aGUgdGVzdCBzb3VyY2UgY29kZToNCj4gKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQo+IA0KPiAvKi0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLXNvdXJjZSBjb2RlLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLWJlZ2luICovDQo+ICNpbmNsdWRl IDxzdGRpby5oPg0KPiAjaW5jbHVkZSAibWFpbi5oIg0KPiANCj4gaW50IG1haW4odm9pZCApDQo+ IHsNCj4gIHByaW50ZigiaGVsbG8gd29ybGRcbiIpOw0KPiAgLyogbm93IHByZXBhcmVkIGNhbGwg Zm4oKSAqLw0KPiAgZm4oKTsNCj4gDQo+IH0NCj4gDQo+IGludCBkLGUsZjsgLyohPCBoZXkhIGxl dCB1cyBkZWZpbmUgZCwgZSwgZiAqLw0KPiANCj4gLyohXHZlcmJhdGltDQo+ICoqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioNCj4gfCBG dW5jdGlvbiBuYW1lICAgICA6IGZuDQo+IHwgRGVzY3JpcHRpb24gICAgIDogDQo+IHwgUmV0dXJu ICAgIDogc3RhdGljIHZvaWQgDQo+IHwgQXJndW1lbnQgICAgICAgICAgOiB2b2lkDQo+IHwgQ2F1 dGlvbiAgICAgICAgICAgOiANCj4gfC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KPiB8IENyZWF0ZSAgICAgICAgICAgIDogMjAwMi0x LTE1IGJ5IENoZW4gQmluDQo+ICAqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKipcZW5kdmVyYmF0aW0NCj4gKi8NCj4gc3RhdGljIHZvaWQg Zm4odm9pZCApDQo+IHsNCj4gIGludCBhLGIsYzsNCj4gIHByaW50Zigibm93IGNhbGxpbmcgZm4o KSIpOw0KPiANCj4gfQ0KPiAvKi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLXNvdXJjZSBjb2RlLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LWVuZCAqLw0KPiANCg== |
From: Moshe K. <Kr...@Pa...> - 2002-01-28 09:38:39
|
Hi Can anyone suggest why most of the HTML output files from Doxygen have the line: <title>Initialization</title> When I perform a search amongst the docs for a particular string, 80% of the results are named "Initialization". Opening them in an HTML editor reveals that the line I quoted above has been affixed to them, evidently by Doxygen. A pointer, perhaps: I do have an HTML document (created as HTML) in the collection of files which has this title. Would this have an affect on all the rest? Any ideas? |
From: Peter S. <pet...@hu...> - 2002-01-25 15:22:44
|
Hello all Some doxygen tags (eg @ref label "text") stop working if they are not on one line; they must not be word wrapped. So I can't use the word wrapping feature of my favourite text editor. One possible solution (apart from making it "wrappable") would be to allow "hard" spaces ( in HTML) between "@ref" and "label" and "text". Usually the hard space is character 160 (32 for space + 128), it is displayed in the western charsets as a space. Regards, Peter -- _ _ Peter Steiner <pet...@hu...> / /_/ / Hug-Witschi AG <http://www.hugwi.ch/> / _ / Electronic Engineering /_/ /_/ _ _ Industriestrasse 12 / / / / / / CH-3178 Boesingen / /_/ /_/ / Tel +41 31 740 44 44 /_ _ _ _ _/ Fax +41 31 740 44 45 |
From: Bohun T. <bh...@dr...> - 2002-01-25 11:43:41
|
SSBmb3VuZCB0aGF0IGRveHlnZW4gaGFzIGEgcHJvYmxlbSBpbiBoYW5kbGluZyBDKysgJ3Rocm93 JyBjbGF1c2VzLiBGb3IgZXhhbXBsZSANCg0KY2xhc3MgeyANCnB1YmxpYzogDQovLyEgdGhyb3dz IGV4Y2VwdGlvbiANCnZpcnR1YWwgdm9pZCB0ZXN0KCkgdGhvcndzIGV4Y2VwdGlvbjsgDQovLyEg dGVzdDIgbWVtYmVyIGZ1bmN0aW9uIA0Kdm9pZCB0ZXN0MigpOyANCn0gDQpQcm9ibGVtcyBhcmU6 IA0KMSkgRG94eWdlbiBpZ25vcmVzIGZ1bmN0aW9uIHdoaWNoIGhhcyAndGhyb3cnIGtleSB3b3Jk LiANCjIpIEFmdGVyIHRoZSAndGhyb3cnIGtleXdvcmQgYWxsIHRoZSBjb21tZW50cyBhcmUgaWdu b3JlZC4gDQoNClBsZWFzZSBoZWxwIG1lIGhvdyB0byBzb2x2ZSBpdC4gOikgDQpUaGFua3MgaW4g YWR2YW5jZS4gDQoNCg0K |
From: Stephane R. <ste...@sy...> - 2002-01-24 21:43:01
|
Hi Dimitri, I found that if I remove the doxfont font from the dot file , the output is good. I found also that the doxfont.ttf is not a vaild font under windows ( doubleclick on doxfont.ttf ). It is possible to set this font in doxygen ? Thanks, Stephane ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitri van Heesch" <di...@st...> To: <dox...@li...> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: Re: [Doxygen-users] Pb with dot-generated graphics : the names are outside the boxes > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 02:29:02PM -0500, Stephane Routelous wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As you can see here : http://exotk.sourceforge.net/exotk-doc/inherits.html , I have problems with Class names which are outside the Boxes ( the boxes are too small, and the text is not centered ). > > > > What can I do ? > > This is a bug in dot. I suggest to check whether you have the latest release > of graphviz. If so, run doxygen with DOT_CLEANUP set to NO, and send the > faulty dot graph (and the font file) as a bug report to the graphviz > developers (see www.graphviz.org). Also mention the platform you are using. > > Regards, > Dimitri > > _______________________________________________ > Doxygen-users mailing list > Dox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users |
From: Phil E. <ped...@dm...> - 2002-01-24 20:55:41
|
In the last couple of days I keep running up against more and more limitations of doxygen. And of course the best way to solve these problems is to hack code rather than just complain. :-) So I've been poking around trying to get the CVS version of doxygen to checkout. I think I finally have it, but I'm wondering why the sourceforge.net CVS server isn't being used. I note that the SF.net project does have open forums and a bug-tracking system set up for doxygen, but they don't seem to get used very much. Are they the right place to look, or is this mailing list where things happen, or somewhere else? Phil |
From: Dimitri v. H. <di...@st...> - 2002-01-24 20:29:27
|
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 02:29:02PM -0500, Stephane Routelous wrote: > Hi, > > As you can see here : http://exotk.sourceforge.net/exotk-doc/inherits.html , I have problems with Class names which are outside the Boxes ( the boxes are too small, and the text is not centered ). > > What can I do ? This is a bug in dot. I suggest to check whether you have the latest release of graphviz. If so, run doxygen with DOT_CLEANUP set to NO, and send the faulty dot graph (and the font file) as a bug report to the graphviz developers (see www.graphviz.org). Also mention the platform you are using. Regards, Dimitri |
From: Stephane R. <ste...@sy...> - 2002-01-24 19:29:29
|
Hi, As you can see here : = http://exotk.sourceforge.net/exotk-doc/inherits.html , I have problems = with Class names which are outside the Boxes ( the boxes are too small, = and the text is not centered ). What can I do ? TIA, Stephane |
From: Dimitri v. H. <di...@st...> - 2002-01-24 17:26:37
|
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 10:04:11AM -0700, David Hite wrote: > Dimitri, > > Doxygen can't handle (old) K & R C style functions. They are not ANSI > standard but many compilers will still compile them. > > It's up to you to decide if this is a bug, or just not supported. This is on the TODO list but will probably not be added (by me at least), since there are tools like GNU's protoize/unprotoize that can do the translation to ANSI C. Regards, Dimitri |
From: David H. <hi...@la...> - 2002-01-24 17:05:30
|
Dimitri, Doxygen can't handle (old) K & R C style functions. They are not ANSI standard but many compilers will still compile them. It's up to you to decide if this is a bug, or just not supported. -Dave- |