Thread: [Doxygen-develop] dia support, again

Brought to you by: dimitri

doxygen-develop

[Doxygen-develop] dia support, again

From: Jan D. <jan...@gm...> - 2013-09-29 09:47:39

Hello,

   Feedback wanted: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707713

   What is the preferred way for receiving enhancement patches -- via
bugzilla, using github .. or other ..?

-- 
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson

Re: [Doxygen-develop] dia support, again

From: Dimitri v. H. <do...@gm...> - 2013-09-29 19:39:41

Hi Jan,

On Sep 29, 2013, at 11:47 , Jan Danielsson <jan...@gm...> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>   Feedback wanted: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707713
> 
>   What is the preferred way for receiving enhancement patches -- via
> bugzilla, using github .. or other ..?

Either bugzilla with attached patch or a github pull request are fine methods.
Github has a slight preference as it makes it easier to update the patch.

I haven't gotten around to try you patch and investigate if it makes sense to
have the \diafile command in doxygen (as opposed to having to add the dia->png conversion in a 
batch file together with running doxygen).

Regards,
  Dimitri

Re: [Doxygen-develop] dia support, again

From: Jan D. <jan...@gm...> - 2013-09-30 05:09:45

On 9/29/13 9:39 PM, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
>>   Feedback wanted: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707713
>>
>>   What is the preferred way for receiving enhancement patches -- via
>> bugzilla, using github .. or other ..?
> 
> Either bugzilla with attached patch or a github pull request are fine methods.
> Github has a slight preference as it makes it easier to update the patch.

   Noted for future reference.

> I haven't gotten around to try you patch and investigate if it makes sense to
> have the \diafile command in doxygen (as opposed to having to add the dia->png conversion in a 
> batch file together with running doxygen).

   That's fair.

   For historical context, note that I added the dia-support to get away
from generating png's and eps's during the build stage for the
documentation; it was causing some annoyances (inconsistently updated
platform-specific scripts, where to put generated files on various
platforms/systems, and such). As you imply; the diafile support is not a
"missing feature" as much as it's scratching an annoying itch.

   /Jan