On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:54:39 +0100, Antoine Tandin
<at...@ko...> wrote:
>=20
> The code I've send is still not in cvs and I have no feedback to know if
> there is a problem with my code.
>=20
> I even don't know if the code has been received.
>=20
> Do di...@st... is the good address to send code ?
>=20
> Should I use a special mail title for submitting code ?
>=20
The address is ok, and the mail has been received. I just haven't
gotten around to it yet.
I did have a brief look and if the patch was trivial to apply I would
have done so, but
that was not the case. The main reasons are:
- The patch contains 4 or so features combined in one. So it is a all
or nothing approach.
- The new features/fixes were not discussed on forehand, and I do not
agree with the
implementation in all cases.
> I did diff =E2=80=93u on /src directory with the lastest cvs snapshot aft=
er merging
> my code with the new snapshot.
>=20
> Do I need to merge my code with the lastest cvs snapshot until my code ha=
s
> been merged ?
No not necessarily, but if you could split the patch up into more managable=
=20
parts that would help.
Regards,
Dimitri
|
