In the current version the syntax of the @ param statemen tis:
\param <parameter-name> { parameter description }
where is an optional attribute specifying the direction of the parameter (bit unclear in the documentation, wrong formulation). can have one of the values: , or .
There is in this syntax no place for the data type of the parameter. I'm therefore suggesting to extend the \param statement with the, optional, possibility for the data type. So the syntax would be:
\param <parameter-name> { parameter description }
with no restrictions what is specified as data type. This could be an extra column in the output.
Any remarks before I submit this to the bug database ?
Best Regards,
Albert
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Dear All,
In the current version the syntax of the @ param statemen tis:
\param <parameter-name> { parameter description }
where is an optional attribute specifying the direction of the parameter (bit unclear in the documentation, wrong formulation). can have one of the values: , or .
There is in this syntax no place for the data type of the parameter. I'm therefore suggesting to extend the \param statement with the, optional, possibility for the data type. So the syntax would be:
\param <parameter-name> { parameter description }
with no restrictions what is specified as data type. This could be an extra column in the output.
Any remarks before I submit this to the bug database ?
Best Regards,
Albert