Each time the doxygen documentation I am in charge of is regenerated, the html addresses of the C++ classes are the same but the methods' ones change. This is very annoying because one can not refer to a class method on the long term (in particular from our forum): Each time (ie every nigth) the doxygen documentation is regenerated the links to methods become obsolete. Is there an option which can be set allowing to preserve such links ?
O.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I found that indeed the links are generated via the functions’ prototypes .. and seems quite stable ... But we used several version of doxygen and the automatic naming seems to have changed between two version .... it is possible ?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
For instance we have a method TGraph::Integral. We get two different URL with 2 different versions of doxygen (doxygen version is displayed at the bottom of the page) .
Hi,
Each time the doxygen documentation I am in charge of is regenerated, the html addresses of the C++ classes are the same but the methods' ones change. This is very annoying because one can not refer to a class method on the long term (in particular from our forum): Each time (ie every nigth) the doxygen documentation is regenerated the links to methods become obsolete. Is there an option which can be set allowing to preserve such links ?
O.
I found that indeed the links are generated via the functions’ prototypes .. and seems quite stable ... But we used several version of doxygen and the automatic naming seems to have changed between two version .... it is possible ?
For instance we have a method TGraph::Integral. We get two different URL with 2 different versions of doxygen (doxygen version is displayed at the bottom of the page) .
with doxygen 1.8.6:
https://root.cern.ch/doc/v606/classTGraph.html#a635997a6d81e4e89529aaf1819cf7533
with doxygen 1.8.13:
https://root.cern.ch/doc/master/classTGraph.html#a06b6dfc69d4fe9336ade71a47864f974
Would it be not simpler to have something like:
classTGraph.html#Integral ?