From: <tr...@do...> - 2014-03-07 15:29:07
|
<p>The following issue has been added to a project that you are monitoring.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Formatting of SPARQL Queries containing UNION can result in invalid SPARQL syntax</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Rob Vesse</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Milestone:</b></td> <td>1.0.4</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Category:</b></td> <td>Query</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Priority:</b></td> <td>Critical</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Type:</b></td> <td>Bug</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Description:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> As reported on the mailing list at <a href="http://sourceforge.net/p/dotnetrdf/mailman/message/32041633/">http://sourceforge.net/p/dotnetrdf/mailman/message/32041633/</a> there is a bug in formatting some queries that contain UNION resulting in invalid SPARQL syntax being generated. This is particularly relevant for code that parses the SPARQL query for correctness before re-serializing it and passing in onto a remote system</p></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=402" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=402</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |