[dotNetRDF-Develop] Issue CORE-386 has a new comment

[<tr...@do...>]

<p>A new comment has been added to the following issue.</p>
<table border="0">
  <tr>
    <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td>
    <td>Unexpected SPARQL results with the &quot;OPTIONAL { ... FILTER (sameTerm) } FILTER (!bound)&quot; query pattern</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><b>Project:</b></td>
    <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><b>Created By:</b></td>
    <td>Rob Vesse</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><b>Date:</b></td>
    <td>2013-11-27 10:22 AM</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><b>Comment:</b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="2"><p>
	Reopening as there does appear to be some issue here, having ported the test cases to Jena I can confirm that the original query does work in Jena. &nbsp;Until I can confirm with Andy if this is the expected behaviour and not a bug in Jena I&#39;ll leave this bug open.</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Btw yes you are correct that the inverted query is not valid for all cases.</p></td>
  </tr>
</table>
<p>
            More information on this issue can be found at
            <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=386" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=386</a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;">
            If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options.
        </p>