Menu
▾
▴
Re: [dotNetRDF-Develop] [Bitbucket] Suggestion about Data.Sql part (direct message)
|
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-07-16 19:22:59
|
Feel free to attempt this, this may be complicated by the fact that the code was on Trunk and later moved to the obsolete branch and then deleted from Trunk. You will likely need to fiddle with the branch and file maps somewhat to get this to work properly. Would it be the end of the world if the history was lost in the new repo? The history still exists in the main repo and we can make reference back to it but if someone wants to resurrect it as a separate community maintained module they just need the base code to start from and then it builds new history as it is updated. You can get this by updating to the relevant branch and then copying the relevant directories. In terms of code integration it was a IGenericIOManager implementation (which was refactored to IStorageProvider) so there will be some code updates to be done to make it compile against dotNetRDF 1.0.0 There would also be some work to get the different framework targeting project files to work since that was before the refactoring to do it all within VS with pre-build events for sync ups. A dotNetRDF.Contrib still seems somewhat heavyweight and implies some level of oversight by the core team, given that Data.Sql was something I explicitly chose to deprecate having it under a Contrib module kinda seems a little odd in that regard. Maybe we can discuss the general Contrib concept (what it would be, how it would work etc) in a separate thread and not conflate it with this thread? Rob From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tom...@gm...> Reply-To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:19 AM To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Cc: Jerin Lee <not...@bi...> Subject: Re: [dotNetRDF-Develop] [Bitbucket] Suggestion about Data.Sql part (direct message) > Hi Rob, Jerin > > I can't recall how the Data.Sql fit in the old code. If possible I would > extract the relevant part of the repository using the convert plugin > (similarily to what we did with the svn->hg migration). This would give you a > new repo/project with all then add dotNetRDF reference from NuGet and it's > almost done. Finally a new project could be created. Maybe it's a good moment > for dotNetRDF.Contrib? > > What do you guys think. Would you like me to try such migration? > > Regards, > Tom > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote: >> Hi Jerin >> >> The beauty of version control is the code still exists you just have to go >> back in time. >> >> You can find it in the closed obsolete branch in Mercurial, from a clone of >> our repository (https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf) run the following: >> >> hg up C obsolete >> >> There you can find the code under Libraries\data.sql >> >> Or if you prefer just download the 0.7.0 source which was the last release to >> include the library in an not completely deprecated state >> (http://www.dotnetrdf.org/downloads/dotnetrdf_library_source_070_beta.zip) >> >> The main difference between the Hash and Simple stores was in how node and >> graph IDs are looked up, see the GetNodeID and GetGraphID procedure >> definitions. In the hash store we used a computed column to hash data to an >> integer which makes looking up existing IDs a function call and then a simple >> index scan. With the simple store we don't use hashes so have to do >> full/partial value based lookup which can be a lot slower. The simple store >> was designed for backwards compatibility with earlier SQL Server versions >> that didn't support hash functions, the Simple 2000 store is the simple store >> done without computed columns which didn't support what we need in SQL Server >> 2000. >> >> It would likely need some clean up before it can be thrown up on BitBucket to >> get it to compile with the latest Core, use NuGet for dependencies etc. and >> you are welcome to do that if you wish, I'm afraid I don't have time to do it >> myself. >> >> Rob >> >> From: Jerin Lee <not...@bi...> >> Date: Saturday, July 13, 2013 11:45 PM >> To: Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> >> Subject: Fwd: [Bitbucket] Suggestion about Data.Sql part (direct message) >> >>> >>> >>> >>> You are receiving this email because you're an administrator of the >>> dotnetrdf team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Jerin Lee sent you a message: >>> Hello, guys. I love dotNetRdf very much. 3rd storage solution is a little >>> complicated for a individual developer. So I wanna try it with sql. I know >>> you sotpped the Data.Sql part. But my suggestion is that you can put the >>> code to a seperate project at bitbucket/github, so that you give the >>> choosing right to developers/users. Also maybe someone will maintain and >>> forward it. P.S. I viewed the resource sql file in dotNetRDF.Data.Sql.dll >>> using JustDecompile. Do you have some doc or words to describe the >>> difference between AdoHashStore.sql and AdoSimpleStore.sql. Thank you for >>> your time. Best wishes! >>> >>> >>> >>> Team email forwarding can be configured from the groups >>> administration page <https://bitbucket.org/account/user/dotnetrdf/groups/> >>> <https://bitbucket.org> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- >>> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics >>> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics >>> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. >>> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >>> dot...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get >>> end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate >>> bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of >>> AppDynamics Pro today! >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_ >>> ______________________________________________ dotNetRDF-develop mailing >>> list dot...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >>> |
