From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-07-12 07:52:17
|
<p>A new comment has been added to the following issue.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Portable Class Library should not include inappropriate synchronous APIs</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Kal</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Date:</b></td> <td>2013-07-12 08:51 AM</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Comment:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> +1 on taking out the sync methods - they are really inappropriate for PCL. However, the reason they are there is that there isn't as good a level of coverage over the async APIs in the unit tests at the moment. You may want to factor in the work required to add more async unit tests as part of the work for this item. I'd be happy to help out with this if I can get some guidance from you on coding style / content for unit tests.</p></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=371" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=371</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |