Re: [dotNetRDF-Develop] 1.0.0 Status Update

[Rob V. <rv...@do...>]

I wanted to get the release out for the end of the month so you have a
couple of weeks

Rob

On 3/11/13 1:33 PM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" <tom...@gm...>
wrote:

>Hi Rob,
>
>Sure, I'd like to contribute the Configuration API changes. I had some
>other tasks during the weekend but this won't take too long. What's my
>deadline for this? :)
>
>Tom
>
>On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote:
>> Hey All
>>
>> Here is the current status on 1.0.0 as I see it, if anyone has anything
>>else
>> they want to get into 1.0.0 now would be a good time to speak up
>>
>> In terms of new features there are a couple of minor ones:
>>
>> AllegroGraphConnector now supports native SPARQL Update (tested against
>> AllegroGraph 4.x on EC2)
>> ITokenisingParser interface for token based parsers allows configuring
>>the
>> TokenQueueMode after a parser is instantiated
>> TreeIndexedTripleCollection now has the option of completely
>>configurable
>> indices
>>
>> Plus there is the usual swathe of bug fixes, the only one that may be
>> affecting people is that I found a bug where GROUP BY could give
>>completely
>> incorrect results for some kinds of query, mainly interactions with
>>other
>> clauses like VALUES and GRAPH.
>>
>> I ran a full regression suite at the end of last week including all the
>> supported 3rd party stores I have access to installations of
>>(everything but
>> 4store right now).  Apart from Dydra which appears to be completely
>>broken
>> (on their end and because of which I have marked DydraConnector as
>>obsolete)
>> everything is working fine.
>>
>> Documentation wise I've ported most stuff over to the BitBucket wiki
>>which
>> is a much nicer platform to work with and as part of that I've
>> updated/rewritten/expanded various aspects.
>>
>> Thanks to Tom for already trawling through it and correcting a few
>>typos and
>> errors on my part.  I have a couple more things to add/update there but
>>I
>> think I am mostly done.  If you have time to review and point out any
>> glaring omissions in the documentation or even better to add
>>documentation
>> yourself that would be great.
>>
>> Remaining work wise I have some clean up and fixes for the Toolkit to
>>get in
>> but otherwise I think I am done for 1.0.0.  Tom do you want to sneak in
>>that
>> Configuration API suggestion since that seems fairly minor and very
>>useful?
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> 
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-----
>> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
>> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
>> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
>> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list
>> dot...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop
>>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
>Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
>endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
>tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
>_______________________________________________
>dotNetRDF-develop mailing list
>dot...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop