From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-02-22 19:28:53
|
<p>The following issue has been added to a project that you are monitoring.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Upgrade VDS.Common to 1.2.0</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Rob Vesse</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Milestone:</b></td> <td>1.0.0</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Category:</b></td> <td>Core API</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Priority:</b></td> <td>Critical</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Type:</b></td> <td>Improvement</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Description:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> We should upgrade to the latest VDS.Common since it resolves an issue occassionally seen by users where VS can report an unhandled NullReferenceException when there really isn't one. VDS.Common has resolved the issue by not auto-detecting whether null keys are supported but rather requiring the user to call a constructor that explicitly configures this behaviour.</p> <p> </p> <p> After upgrading the dependency version we will need to modify our constructor calls to set this where necessary.</p></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=317" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=317</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |