|
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-02-05 17:44:01
|
Yes I guess it should, the connector was developed for 3.x and then later updated for 4.0 at which point I don't believe it supported SPARQL update. It should be relatively easy to add support for updates, filed as CORE-308 <http://dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=308> Note that as a workaround you can use GenericUpdateProcessor to apply updates over an AllegroGraphConnector. Then once an updated version of dotNetRDF with IUpdateableStorage supported on AllegroGraphConnector is available you won't need to change your code since GenericUpdateProcessor defers to the provided update implementation if the IStorageProvider instance implements IUpdateableStorage Rob From: Yossi Cohen <yos...@li...> Reply-To: dotNetRDF User Help and Support <dot...@li...> Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 11:30 AM To: DotNetRDF mailing-list <dot...@li...> Subject: SPAM-LOW: [dotNetRDF-Support] AllegroGraphConnector & IUpdateableStorage > Shouldn't AllegroGraphConnector implement IUpdateableStorage ? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before > the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb____________________________________________ > ___ dotNetRDF-Support mailing list dot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-support |