Re: [dotNetRDF-Develop] 0.8.0 Release?

[Rob V. <rv...@do...>]

Here's a quick guide

SPARQL 1.0
- Graph Patterns - OPTIONAL, GRAPH, UNION
- FILTER
- Expressions - BOUND, ISIRI, ISBLANK, ISLITERAL, STR, LANG, DATATYPE, ||,
&&, =, SAMETERM, LANGMATCHES, REGEX, >, >=, <, <=, XPath constructors
(xsd:boolean, xsd:integer etc)
- Solution Modifiers - ORDER BY, LIMIT, OFFSET

SPARQL 1.1 - As SPARQL 1.0 plus the following
- Graph Patterns - Sub-SELECT, MINUS, SERVICE, VALUES, EXISTS and NOT
EXISTS (these last two are in FILTER only)
- Expressions - IF, COALESCE, NOT EXISTS, EXISTS, IN, NOT IN, ISNUMERIC,
IRI, BNODE, STRDT, STRLANG, UUID, STRUUID, STRLEN, SUBSTR, UCASE, LCASE,
STRSTARTS, STRENDS, CONTAINS, STRBEFORE, STRAFTER, ENCODE_FOR_URI, CONCAT,
REPLACE, ABS, ROUND, CEIL, FLOOR, RAND, NOW, YEAR, MONTH, DAY, HOURS,
MINUTES, SECONDS, TIMEZONE, TZ, MD5, SHA1, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512
- Solution Modifiers - GROUP BY, HAVING, VALUES
- Aggregate Expressions - AVG, COUNT, GROUP_CONCAT, MAX, MIN, SAMPLE

So clearly SPARQL 1.0 is much smaller

Hope this helps,

Rob

On 11/15/12 2:39 AM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" <tom...@gm...>
wrote:

>Can do. Can you point me to a concise comparison between SPARQL 1.0 and
>1.1.
>
>Or maybe you could quickly draft what you think should come first and
>what cant wait?
>
>Thanks,
>Tom
>
>On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote:
>> May have spoken too soon on the 0.8.0 release, the proposed
>> recommendations for SPARQL 1.1 just came out so I'm going to try and get
>> some final compatibility and bug fixing for this done before the next
>> release.
>>
>> On the fluent query front maybe it would be sufficient to have a partial
>> API in place for 0.8.0.  By partial I mean something that supported the
>> major constructs of the language (WHERE, OPTIONAL, GRAPH, UNION,
>>SERVICE,
>> FILTER etc) with a limited set of expressions supported.  Something that
>> just covered the SPARQL 1.0 operators would be sufficient and we can
>>flesh
>> out to the full SPARQL 1.1 set in later releases.
>>
>> How does this sound?
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On 11/11/12 9:53 AM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" <tom...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I don't mind an earlier release.
>>>
>>>Regarding the Fluent API I think we could get it out in 8.1 or so. At
>>>this point maybe it will be good to define some kind of a road map
>>>internally. SPARQL has many features and it is possible to implement
>>>some in the first go and add more later on. I would be good to decide
>>>what should be delivered at first. As we all know time is limited and
>>>I'm working hard to get the code thoroughly tested. Especially in the
>>>arithmetic and logical operators where there is a multitude of
>>>possible combinations and each one needs a operator overload for the
>>>API to be complete and most user-friendly.
>>>
>>>If you haven't noticed, I am maintaining a documentation of the API's
>>>features on a wiki [1]. If you guys could find some spare time to have
>>>a look at it and maybe offer suggestions that would be great.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Tom
>>>
>>>[1] https://bitbucket.org/romanticweb/dotnetrdf/wiki/
>>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote:
>>>> Hey All
>>>>
>>>> Would anyone object if I went ahead and made the 0.8.0 release
>>>>sometime
>>>>next
>>>> week?
>>>>
>>>> There's a whole bunch of bug fixes in there, updates to SPARQL 1.1
>>>> compliance and general improvements to SPARQL implementation plus
>>>> significant fixes and updates to the Query.FullText library.
>>>>
>>>> I had originally thought that we might get the Fluent Query API in
>>>>this
>>>> release but looking at what Tom's got so far (which is great btw) it's
>>>> clearly a much bigger lift than I first thought.  I'd rather push that
>>>>to
>>>> unscheduled and have it be merged in as and when Tom thinks it's ready
>>>> rather than holding back a useful (and primarily bug fix) release.
>>>>
>>>> Any other thoughts/objections?
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>--
>>>>-----
>>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list
>>>> dot...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop
>>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>--
>>>----
>>>Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>>Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>>Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>>http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>dotNetRDF-develop mailing list
>>>dot...@li...
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-----
>> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
>> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
>> SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> _______________________________________________
>> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list
>> dot...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
>web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
>SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>_______________________________________________
>dotNetRDF-develop mailing list
>dot...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop