From: Tomasz P. <tom...@gm...> - 2012-11-15 10:39:57
|
Can do. Can you point me to a concise comparison between SPARQL 1.0 and 1.1. Or maybe you could quickly draft what you think should come first and what cant wait? Thanks, Tom On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote: > May have spoken too soon on the 0.8.0 release, the proposed > recommendations for SPARQL 1.1 just came out so I'm going to try and get > some final compatibility and bug fixing for this done before the next > release. > > On the fluent query front maybe it would be sufficient to have a partial > API in place for 0.8.0. By partial I mean something that supported the > major constructs of the language (WHERE, OPTIONAL, GRAPH, UNION, SERVICE, > FILTER etc) with a limited set of expressions supported. Something that > just covered the SPARQL 1.0 operators would be sufficient and we can flesh > out to the full SPARQL 1.1 set in later releases. > > How does this sound? > > Rob > > On 11/11/12 9:53 AM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" <tom...@gm...> > wrote: > >>I don't mind an earlier release. >> >>Regarding the Fluent API I think we could get it out in 8.1 or so. At >>this point maybe it will be good to define some kind of a road map >>internally. SPARQL has many features and it is possible to implement >>some in the first go and add more later on. I would be good to decide >>what should be delivered at first. As we all know time is limited and >>I'm working hard to get the code thoroughly tested. Especially in the >>arithmetic and logical operators where there is a multitude of >>possible combinations and each one needs a operator overload for the >>API to be complete and most user-friendly. >> >>If you haven't noticed, I am maintaining a documentation of the API's >>features on a wiki [1]. If you guys could find some spare time to have >>a look at it and maybe offer suggestions that would be great. >> >>Thanks, >>Tom >> >>[1] https://bitbucket.org/romanticweb/dotnetrdf/wiki/ >> >>On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote: >>> Hey All >>> >>> Would anyone object if I went ahead and made the 0.8.0 release sometime >>>next >>> week? >>> >>> There's a whole bunch of bug fixes in there, updates to SPARQL 1.1 >>> compliance and general improvements to SPARQL implementation plus >>> significant fixes and updates to the Query.FullText library. >>> >>> I had originally thought that we might get the Fluent Query API in this >>> release but looking at what Tom's got so far (which is great btw) it's >>> clearly a much bigger lift than I first thought. I'd rather push that >>>to >>> unscheduled and have it be merged in as and when Tom thinks it's ready >>> rather than holding back a useful (and primarily bug fix) release. >>> >>> Any other thoughts/objections? >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>----- >>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. >>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics >>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >>> dot...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >>> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>---- >>Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. >>Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics >>Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: >>http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov >>_______________________________________________ >>dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >>dot...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov > _______________________________________________ > dotNetRDF-develop mailing list > dot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop |