[dotNetRDF-Develop] Different means to accessing RDF

[Tomasz P. <tom...@gm...>]

Hi Rob

As you already know I have started working on a ORM-like mapper based
on dotNetRDF. I intend it to be as thin as possible and rely mostly on
the underlying powers of your library. To make it possible I have
defined an interfaces called IRomanticContext+dynamic proxies, which
will hide the details of how RDF triples and graphs are manipulated.

The question I have comes form the fact the I need multiple context
types for different types of underlying data. I have indentified the
IGraph, ITripleStore, ISparqlDataset and BaseEndopint types, which
give access to various sources of RDF. Will I really need to wrap all
of those to provide a uniform abstraction layer over dotNetRDF? Is
there some kind of common denominator?

Regards,
Tom