From: Broekstra, J. <jee...@wu...> - 2010-08-02 09:17:48
|
Rob Vesse wrote: > Yes there was a bug in the parser which is now fixed in SVN > as of revision 857 and will be in the next release but the > main problem is that much of your syntax is invalid and so > actually gets ignored. I know, in fact my main reason for trying out your RDFa parser was to try and use it to figure out what I was doing wrong. I've read my share of cryptic W3C specs but the RDFa one is in a league of its own to be honest... Good to know the bug is known and fixed! [snip various very useful tips] Thanks for your help Rob, I'll putter on and try and get it right :) Cheers, Jeen |