On 10/22/12 1:38 PM, "Rob Vesse" <rv...@do...> wrote:
>Ok
>
>Can you send me a pull request for the IIS Express related changes?
>
>Then I'll look at getting those projects fixed up as necessary
>
>Rob
>
>On 10/22/12 11:32 AM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" <tom...@gm...>
>wrote:
>
>>Thanks Rob, looks like vsmdi file was the cause.
>>
>>I still got quite a few tests failing for various reasons. One more
>>frequent reason comes from the WebDemos app, where ConfigurationLoader
>>calls Type.GetType("VDS.RDF.Configuration.AdoObjectFactory,
>>dotNetRDF.Data.Sql") but AdoObjectFactory is apparently not there
>>anymore and the config.ttl needs updating. There is the same issue
>>with BSBM and sp2b web apps.
>>
>>Speaking of the web applications. Have a look at my latest commit [1].
>>I have changed the projects to use the IIS Express I have mentioned
>>some time ago so you can see how it works for you. I have also updated
>>the test config template and the IIS servers should start on the same
>>port for everyone. If you have Visual Studio with SP1 installed IIS
>>Express you should be prompted to install IIS Express the first time
>>using Web Platform installer. It is an advantage over using full IIS,
>>which for one may be absent on developer machines and doesn't require
>>running VS with admin rights (actually is it currently necessary for
>>running the WebDemos and others?). Also to address your concerns you
>>have expressed the other time, IIS Express 7.5 is fully compatible
>>with IIS 7. I have used it for several projects during development and
>>there were never any issues.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Tom
>>
>>[1]
>>https://bitbucket.org/romanticweb/dotnetrdf/changeset/95a6fee1fd093ea49f9
>>f
>>c62c35c45df2634e0997
>>
>>On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote:
>>> This sounds like your test environment may not be correct, looks like
>>>this
>>> is because I have the Tests.testrunconfig checked in but not the
>>> dotNetRDF.vsmdi which would be required for that testrunconfig file to
>>>be
>>> respected, should be corrected in the repo now. Please pull the latest
>>> from Trunk
>>>
>>> Other comments inline:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/22/12 2:36 AM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz"
>>><tom...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Rob
>>>>
>>>>I wanted to make sure my working on the fluant API didn't intruduce
>>>>any regressions I ran the unit tests and many of them have failed on
>>>>opening the test files. Namely 436 tests have failed and most seem to
>>>>fail for simmilar reasons. It seems that in most of the test methods
>>>>you load files simmilarily to
>>>>
>>>>OntologyGraph g = new OntologyGraph();
>>>>FileLoader.Load(g, "InferenceTest.ttl");
>>>>
>>>>This tries to load the file from the bin/Debug folder but the testing
>>>>files reside inside bin\Debug\resources. Do you or anyone else also
>>>>get all those failed? It seem there is a need to fix that...
>>>
>>> The MSTest runner in Visual Studio does not run tests from the
>>>bin/Debug
>>> directory, rather it copies the DLL (and dependencies) to a new
>>>directory
>>> called TestResults/somedir usually created at the solution level.
>>>somedir
>>> is a generated name consisting usually of your machine name and a
>>> timestamp concatenated.
>>>
>>> It does not explicitly copy any Content resources for the project,
>>>this
>>>is
>>> done explicitly by configuring the Tests.testrunconfig file which can
>>>be
>>> found at the top level of the repository (or under Solution Items in
>>> Visual Studio). This is where it specifies that the resources
>>>directory
>>> be copied into the test directory, this copying copies directory
>>>contents
>>> rather than directories as-is hence the lack of "resources" in the
>>>paths
>>> in the actual tests.
>>>
>>> The missing vsdmi file meant the test config wasn't respected and so
>>>the
>>> resources weren't copied hence the errors you saw.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Also taking VDS.RDF.Test.Ontology.OntologyTests as an example, you
>>>>load the file in every test method. You are but aware of the
>>>>[TestInitialize] attribute for method which runs before every test
>>>>method and can be used for preparing test environment?
>>>
>>> Yes but often the act of loading the model is part of the test not a
>>>setup
>>> activity.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Also having
>>>>looked at the aforementioned test class, why are there no Asserts in
>>>>the test methods?
>>>
>>> For some tests the test is simply that the code not thrown an exception
>>> (which would by definition cause a test failure)
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
|
