You can subscribe to this list here.
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
2011 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(27) |
2012 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(182) |
Mar
(83) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(135) |
Aug
(84) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(61) |
2013 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(66) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(56) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(54) |
2014 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(72) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(63) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(45) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(16) |
2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(16) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <dot...@li...> - 2013-05-09 23:10:10
|
Send dotNetRDF-commits mailing list submissions to dot...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-commits or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to dot...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at dot...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of dotNetRDF-commits digest..." Today's Topics: 1. commit/dotnetrdf: 10 new changesets (Bitbucket) 2. commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Merge in initial version of Fluent Query API for inclusion in the next release (CORE-260) (Bitbucket) 3. commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Add new projectsync target to NAnt build file (Bitbucket) 4. commit/dotnetrdf: 2 new changesets (Bitbucket) 5. commit/dotnetrdf: 3 new changesets (Bitbucket) 6. commit/dotnetrdf: 3 new changesets (Bitbucket) 7. commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Add *.PublicKey to ignore list (Bitbucket) 8. commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Fix a possible race condition bug in Describe handler implementation, disable SparqlView tests for now pending investigation into their intermittent behaviour (Bitbucket) 9. commit/dotnetrdf: 6 new changesets (Bitbucket) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 19:01:12 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 10 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 10 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/5b0a8ff14244/ Changeset: 5b0a8ff14244 Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:17:03 Summary: Merge latest changes from default to fluent-query branch Affected #: 332 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/a629b6bdf644/ Changeset: a629b6bdf644 Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:23:24 Summary: Latest version of SyncProjects Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/3a28d06b42ed/ Changeset: 3a28d06b42ed Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:29:37 Summary: Update SyncProjects so disk sync is case insensitive Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/0f3339451d6e/ Changeset: 0f3339451d6e Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:31:27 Summary: Fix merge bug in dotNetRDF.Net35.csproj Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/9c4b7e7cbf4c/ Changeset: 9c4b7e7cbf4c Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:41:18 Summary: Version of SyncProjects where disk sync is actually case insensitive Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/6dfb9711c00a/ Changeset: 6dfb9711c00a Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:46:16 Summary: Add disk sync pre-build event to core library which helps when merging project files across branches which tends to be a little sucky even with Mercurial. Removed a couple of completely defunct files I discovered through this Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/8cdad0e0b8f7/ Changeset: 8cdad0e0b8f7 Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:49:45 Summary: Add disk sync pre-build event to unit test project, remove defunct files discovered this way Affected #: 4 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/97e811e17db4/ Changeset: 97e811e17db4 Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:51:36 Summary: Move Fluent Query Builder tests into appropriate part of namespace hierarchy Affected #: 33 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/9e61abf9c237/ Changeset: 9e61abf9c237 Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:54:59 Summary: Mostly convert Query Builder unit tets to NUnit Affected #: 18 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/d78da59582c5/ Changeset: d78da59582c5 Branch: fluent-query User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 21:00:47 Summary: Fix up a couple of broken Fluent Query tests caused by the higher level of precision now used for xsd:dateTime literals Affected #: 7 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 19:05:28 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Merge in initial version of Fluent Query API for inclusion in the next release (CORE-260) To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 1 new commit in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/ee38a0922b7b/ Changeset: ee38a0922b7b User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 21:05:15 Summary: Merge in initial version of Fluent Query API for inclusion in the next release (CORE-260) Affected #: 96 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 19:52:42 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Add new projectsync target to NAnt build file To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 1 new commit in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/bdd622ab717e/ Changeset: bdd622ab717e User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 21:47:32 Summary: Add new projectsync target to NAnt build file Affected #: 6 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 20:05:55 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 2 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 2 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/7f81a3b9059d/ Changeset: 7f81a3b9059d User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 22:01:23 Summary: Fix merge issues with not signing core library client profile builds Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/4f6955240cc2/ Changeset: 4f6955240cc2 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 22:03:57 Summary: Fix merge issues around package versions Affected #: 18 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 20:46:00 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 3 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 3 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/6859ad63417f/ Changeset: 6859ad63417f Branch: fluent-query User: tpluscode Date: 2013-03-08 21:48:16 Summary: Merge with default Affected #: 164 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/32732e839d5d/ Changeset: 32732e839d5d Branch: fluent-query User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-15 22:08:25 Summary: Merge Fluent Query with default Affected #: 104 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/ea2efdc1c62f/ Changeset: ea2efdc1c62f Branch: fluent-query User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-24 08:34:37 Summary: Merge with default Affected #: 678 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 20:54:35 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 3 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 3 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/4a8902a0e383/ Changeset: 4a8902a0e383 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 22:46:11 Summary: Up timeouts on Trix Performance tests to cope with running on slow machines Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/3df2d842652d/ Changeset: 3df2d842652d User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 22:53:34 Summary: Improve AskBgp() to add additional timeout checks which should resolve one of the failing tests Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/3178e255941d/ Changeset: 3178e255941d User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 22:53:50 Summary: Merging heads Affected #: 2 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 20:58:27 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Add *.PublicKey to ignore list To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 1 new commit in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/ee3fbf7d9fb3/ Changeset: ee3fbf7d9fb3 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 22:58:19 Summary: Add *.PublicKey to ignore list Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 22:14:41 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Fix a possible race condition bug in Describe handler implementation, disable SparqlView tests for now pending investigation into their intermittent behaviour To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 1 new commit in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/c3f72c67e29d/ Changeset: c3f72c67e29d User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-10 00:10:40 Summary: Fix a possible race condition bug in Describe handler implementation, disable SparqlView tests for now pending investigation into their intermittent behaviour Affected #: 9 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 23:10:01 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 6 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 6 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/dca22ae653b7/ Changeset: dca22ae653b7 Branch: sparql-views User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-10 00:26:34 Summary: Refactor BaseSparqlView to try and resolve an intermittent test failure Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/e79aec37ea93/ Changeset: e79aec37ea93 Branch: sparql-views User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-10 00:28:35 Summary: Additional unit test to try and ensure we aren't just seeing the intermittent pass Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/20a97ecbef9e/ Changeset: 20a97ecbef9e Branch: sparql-views User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-10 00:43:13 Summary: Improve how BaseSparqlView protects itself from re-entrancy race conditions which should resolve the intermittent test failures Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/71dbf4f29aa6/ Changeset: 71dbf4f29aa6 Branch: sparql-views User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-10 01:08:30 Summary: Further improve test coverage for BaseSparqlView Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/ab93d4afd2d9/ Changeset: ab93d4afd2d9 Branch: sparql-views User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-10 01:08:51 Summary: Close branch now intermittent test failures are resolved Affected #: 0 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/4c99d7e922f3/ Changeset: 4c99d7e922f3 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-10 01:09:18 Summary: Merge in fixes and improved tests for SPARQL Views Affected #: 3 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ dotNetRDF-commits mailing list dot...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-commits End of dotNetRDF-commits Digest, Vol 8, Issue 3 *********************************************** |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-05-09 21:38:53
|
* I upped the timeouts on the TriX performance tests and that seems to have solved things for now * I made a fix which should ensure that SparqlQueryTimeoutDuringProductLazy2 reliably fails * The other two failing SPARQL tests I am not sure why they fail, they passed in the most recent build so I'll see if they crop up again as failures. I will look at fixing up the DBPedia issue tomorrow though DBPedia appears to be playing ball for now Rob From: Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> Reply-To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 1:11 PM To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Subject: Re: [dotNetRDF-Develop] Unit tests > Definitely > > I am looking into all of these and will get the appropriate changes made by > end of tomorrow hopefully > > Re: speed tests I thing there may be an unintentional memory leak there since > I've seen the same thing with the 1 million test on my local machine, need to > do some digging so may just ignore those tests temporarily until such time as > I've properly diagnosed the issue. > > Rob > > From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tom...@gm...> > Reply-To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request > <dot...@li...> > Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 1:02 PM > To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request > <dot...@li...> > Subject: [dotNetRDF-Develop] Unit tests > >> Hi Rob >> >> I would like to discuss the remaining issue I've been having with running >> unit tests both on my machine and in TeamCity. recent changes have corrected >> most of the issues and now there are just a few remaining >> >> 1. DBpedia >> If you look at the two latest builds on TC you will notice that out of the >> blue some of the DBpedia tests would fail. Usually they report HTTP 500 and >> weirdest is the graph equality test, which once in a while fetches a >> different graph from the same URI. This has actually happened for me locally >> as well. >> >> I think we should replace all calls to DBpedia with out local copies of those >> graphs and work on these just as most other tests do. >> >> 2. TriX performance tests >> Not sure why these fail but this behavior has been consistent on TC for >> larger test graphs. I guess it has something to do with mediocre performance >> of the network drive that is likely acting for my VPS' storage. >> >> I think we could either exclude these tests from executing on CI environment >> or maybe remove the timeout attribute and leave them for manual inspection. >> Or maybe report as inconclusive if the parsing takes mroe than a given amount >> of time? >> >> 3. Speed tests >> I have completely disable the parsing speed tests because they were literally >> killing my VPS. Memory usage that is. The 1 million triple test would kill >> JVM on most runs. Locally I have 8 GB of RAM and upon completion this test >> uses almost half of my physical memory. Is this really necessary or is there >> possibly some memory leak? >> >> The remaining three tests are >> >> QueryTimeouts.SparqlQueryTimeoutDuringProductLazy2 >> SparqlTests2.SparqlBindScope6 >> SparqlQueryTests.SparqlFilterShouldGetPlaced >> >> Any ideas why these fail? >> >> Having the above sorted out I would like to start publishing NuGet from TC. >> >> Thanks, >> Tom >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is >> the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This >> 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early >> access version is available now. Download your free book today! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may__________________________________________ >> _____ dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >> dot...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li >> stinfo/dotnetrdf-develop > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the > definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page > book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access > version is available now. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may___________________________________________ > ____ dotNetRDF-develop mailing list dot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-05-09 20:11:58
|
Definitely I am looking into all of these and will get the appropriate changes made by end of tomorrow hopefully Re: speed tests I thing there may be an unintentional memory leak there since I've seen the same thing with the 1 million test on my local machine, need to do some digging so may just ignore those tests temporarily until such time as I've properly diagnosed the issue. Rob From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tom...@gm...> Reply-To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 1:02 PM To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Subject: [dotNetRDF-Develop] Unit tests > Hi Rob > > I would like to discuss the remaining issue I've been having with running unit > tests both on my machine and in TeamCity. recent changes have corrected most > of the issues and now there are just a few remaining > > 1. DBpedia > If you look at the two latest builds on TC you will notice that out of the > blue some of the DBpedia tests would fail. Usually they report HTTP 500 and > weirdest is the graph equality test, which once in a while fetches a different > graph from the same URI. This has actually happened for me locally as well. > > I think we should replace all calls to DBpedia with out local copies of those > graphs and work on these just as most other tests do. > > 2. TriX performance tests > Not sure why these fail but this behavior has been consistent on TC for larger > test graphs. I guess it has something to do with mediocre performance of the > network drive that is likely acting for my VPS' storage. > > I think we could either exclude these tests from executing on CI environment > or maybe remove the timeout attribute and leave them for manual inspection. Or > maybe report as inconclusive if the parsing takes mroe than a given amount of > time? > > 3. Speed tests > I have completely disable the parsing speed tests because they were literally > killing my VPS. Memory usage that is. The 1 million triple test would kill JVM > on most runs. Locally I have 8 GB of RAM and upon completion this test uses > almost half of my physical memory. Is this really necessary or is there > possibly some memory leak? > > The remaining three tests are > > QueryTimeouts.SparqlQueryTimeoutDuringProductLazy2 > SparqlTests2.SparqlBindScope6 > SparqlQueryTests.SparqlFilterShouldGetPlaced > > Any ideas why these fail? > > Having the above sorted out I would like to start publishing NuGet from TC. > > Thanks, > Tom > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the > definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page > book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access > version is available now. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may___________________________________________ > ____ dotNetRDF-develop mailing list dot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop |
From: Tomasz P. <tom...@gm...> - 2013-05-09 20:03:08
|
Hi Rob I would like to discuss the remaining issue I've been having with running unit tests both on my machine and in TeamCity. recent changes have corrected most of the issues and now there are just a few remaining 1. DBpedia If you look at the two latest builds on TC you will notice that out of the blue some of the DBpedia tests would fail. Usually they report HTTP 500 and weirdest is the graph equality test, which once in a while fetches a different graph from the same URI. This has actually happened for me locally as well. I think we should replace all calls to DBpedia with out local copies of those graphs and work on these just as most other tests do. 2. TriX performance tests Not sure why these fail but this behavior has been consistent on TC for larger test graphs. I guess it has something to do with mediocre performance of the network drive that is likely acting for my VPS' storage. I think we could either exclude these tests from executing on CI environment or maybe remove the timeout attribute and leave them for manual inspection. Or maybe report as inconclusive if the parsing takes mroe than a given amount of time? 3. Speed tests I have completely disable the parsing speed tests because they were literally killing my VPS. Memory usage that is. The 1 million triple test would kill JVM on most runs. Locally I have 8 GB of RAM and upon completion this test uses almost half of my physical memory. Is this really necessary or is there possibly some memory leak? The remaining three tests are QueryTimeouts.SparqlQueryTimeoutDuringProductLazy2 SparqlTests2.SparqlBindScope6 SparqlQueryTests.SparqlFilterShouldGetPlaced Any ideas why these fail? Having the above sorted out I would like to start publishing NuGet from TC. Thanks, Tom |
From: Tomasz P. <tom...@gm...> - 2013-05-09 18:23:13
|
Oh my I also have bumped into WiX Toolkit and even started to experiment but it's seeming complexity overwhelmed me :( Is there anyone with some more experience on setting up WiX projects? Tom On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote: > One problem with the current Toolkit Installer which I've wrestled with > for a while when using NAnt builds and which Tom recently hit with TeamCity > is that .vdproj files cannot be built by MSBuild > > The open source WiX toolkit (which is another project out of the open > source areas of MS just like NuGet) seems like a good alternative and has > both VS integration and MSBuild targets that mean we could build an > installer both in VS, via NAnt at the command line and via Team City > without any issues. > > I will file an issue for this in the tracker, if anyone has time to > investigate this it would be much appreciated > > Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > dotNetRDF-develop mailing list > dot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop > > |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-05-09 18:20:13
|
<p>The following issue has been added to a project that you are monitoring.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Replace current .vdproj based installer with a WiX based installer</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Toolkit</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Rob Vesse</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Milestone:</b></td> <td>Unscheduled</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Category:</b></td> <td>Release Process</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Priority:</b></td> <td>High</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Type:</b></td> <td>Refactor</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Description:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> The current .vdproj installer has some issues:</p> <ul> <li> Can only be built inside Visual Studio</li> <li> Cannot be build via MSBuild</li> <li> Cannot be built on TeamCity without a VS installation</li> </ul> <p> Therefore it would be useful to transition to using the WiX toolkit which is an open source Windows installer toolkit that can be used both within VS and on the command line.</p></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=360" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=360</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-05-09 18:14:52
|
One problem with the current Toolkit Installer which I've wrestled with for a while when using NAnt builds and which Tom recently hit with TeamCity is that .vdproj files cannot be built by MSBuild The open source WiX toolkit (which is another project out of the open source areas of MS just like NuGet) seems like a good alternative and has both VS integration and MSBuild targets that mean we could build an installer both in VS, via NAnt at the command line and via Team City without any issues. I will file an issue for this in the tracker, if anyone has time to investigate this it would be much appreciated Rob |
From: <dot...@li...> - 2013-05-09 18:11:02
|
Send dotNetRDF-commits mailing list submissions to dot...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-commits or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to dot...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at dot...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of dotNetRDF-commits digest..." Today's Topics: 1. commit/dotnetrdf: 11 new changesets (Bitbucket) 2. commit/dotnetrdf: 2 new changesets (Bitbucket) 3. commit/dotnetrdf: 46 new changesets (Bitbucket) 4. commit/dotnetrdf: 4 new changesets (Bitbucket) 5. commit/dotnetrdf: 7 new changesets (Bitbucket) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 00:11:21 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 11 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 11 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/9be61459b5f3/ Changeset: 9be61459b5f3 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 00:53:01 Summary: Fix target framework for Virtuoso Client Profile build Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/284f50a4fd4a/ Changeset: 284f50a4fd4a User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 00:55:10 Summary: Tweak namespace docs ready for release Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/11f687772f33/ Changeset: 11f687772f33 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 01:01:52 Summary: Note known limitations in Release Notes Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/e338fdf24a37/ Changeset: e338fdf24a37 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 01:06:26 Summary: Prepare revision numbers for release Affected #: 31 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/67331bd6d889/ Changeset: 67331bd6d889 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 01:12:59 Summary: Up revision number since I have one final commit I want to put into the release Affected #: 31 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/8076946c201d/ Changeset: 8076946c201d User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 01:36:29 Summary: Fix up missing XML comments, finalize Change Log for 1.0.0 release Affected #: 10 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/4f88aa38463d/ Changeset: 4f88aa38463d User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 01:39:58 Summary: Update final version numbers in NuSpec files Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/481b13e045c8/ Changeset: 481b13e045c8 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 01:40:17 Summary: Update final verison number in NAnt build file Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/694b227c3a8c/ Changeset: 694b227c3a8c User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 01:54:38 Summary: Fix a regression in DecimalCast Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/8600d12997cf/ Changeset: 8600d12997cf User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 02:10:26 Summary: Finalize 1.0.0 release (Build 1.0.0.2473) Affected #: 35 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/3e05e0afe6ff/ Changeset: 3e05e0afe6ff User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-04 02:10:48 Summary: Added tag 1.0.0, 100 for changeset 8600d12997cf Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 23:56:50 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 2 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 2 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/b22a64c0e1ae/ Changeset: b22a64c0e1ae User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-07 01:08:25 Summary: Additional RDF/XML parser tests Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/ce19b40c89ff/ Changeset: ce19b40c89ff User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-07 01:56:39 Summary: Missing test resource from previous commit Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 17:48:19 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 46 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 46 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/be662e41eaef/ Changeset: be662e41eaef User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-19 17:58:20 Summary: modified nuspec files to explicitly define source files Affected #: 4 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/c5b04227c392/ Changeset: c5b04227c392 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 15:23:13 Summary: added target to patch nuspec files Affected #: 6 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/6bf112a11de3/ Changeset: 6bf112a11de3 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 16:11:59 Summary: corrected xsl path Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/af686cce474a/ Changeset: af686cce474a User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 16:17:49 Summary: corrected move after XSL processing Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/8e72a990306b/ Changeset: 8e72a990306b User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 16:24:59 Summary: nuspec version tag is required Affected #: 4 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/20db9059026f/ Changeset: 20db9059026f User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 16:29:52 Summary: fix invalid move target Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/07a45a680e07/ Changeset: 07a45a680e07 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 17:30:52 Summary: fix nuspec patch style Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/429af4060382/ Changeset: 429af4060382 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 17:38:38 Summary: have XML Doc created by both Debug and Release builds Affected #: 15 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/7ff38327a037/ Changeset: 7ff38327a037 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 18:08:29 Summary: again, missing NET40 constant Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/f6bc5c142665/ Changeset: f6bc5c142665 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 12:11:39 Summary: replace mstest with nunit Affected #: 177 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/c0b0cd69a8f8/ Changeset: c0b0cd69a8f8 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 18:14:28 Summary: extract suite parser base class Affected #: 8 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/f87d209ffedf/ Changeset: f87d209ffedf User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 18:15:01 Summary: fix all of parsing test suites Affected #: 5 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/c7c386024584/ Changeset: c7c386024584 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 18:33:56 Summary: compact TSV tests using TestCase Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/61ba883b87d0/ Changeset: 61ba883b87d0 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 18:50:12 Summary: update to reflect that a different Replace function is used Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/b333ac43251d/ Changeset: b333ac43251d User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 18:55:19 Summary: rename and use TestCase for DESCRIBE algorithms Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/86734e570c24/ Changeset: 86734e570c24 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 20:07:37 Summary: fix change in test files location Affected #: 55 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/bc8fd4a27e0a/ Changeset: bc8fd4a27e0a User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 21:54:23 Summary: no consent for NuGet restore Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/9e7ff1b7d132/ Changeset: 9e7ff1b7d132 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 22:03:08 Summary: remove test config Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/599222c2c4e2/ Changeset: 599222c2c4e2 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 22:03:22 Summary: missing debug constants Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/0427fa2c178e/ Changeset: 0427fa2c178e User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 22:16:36 Summary: change .hgignore to ignore all build artifacts Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/ae2abd7cae52/ Changeset: ae2abd7cae52 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-16 20:30:30 Summary: resharper inspection settings Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/95f14f40a17c/ Changeset: 95f14f40a17c User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-19 07:31:48 Summary: using NUnit not Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/3e3604c90917/ Changeset: 3e3604c90917 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-13 18:43:17 Summary: inconclusive instead of failed when no UnitTestConfig Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/c8028577fec9/ Changeset: c8028577fec9 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-19 07:33:04 Summary: wrong hgignore syntax Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/71910eff7457/ Changeset: 71910eff7457 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 18:29:47 Summary: wrong path string Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/bfd5b88e8680/ Changeset: bfd5b88e8680 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 18:46:39 Summary: add a category to speed tests to ignore on TeamCity Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/f4b329c07ebc/ Changeset: f4b329c07ebc User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 18:51:02 Summary: some fixes to tests after merge Affected #: 5 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/80b4f7d7eec8/ Changeset: 80b4f7d7eec8 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 18:52:16 Summary: should parse numericals in invariant culture Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/0f3716020c47/ Changeset: 0f3716020c47 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 19:15:19 Summary: tested for wrong blank node identifier Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/613cd05d58b5/ Changeset: 613cd05d58b5 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-20 21:47:22 Summary: fix lang spec tests Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/97f651b930ef/ Changeset: 97f651b930ef User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-21 10:57:22 Summary: comment unused, problematic variable Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/08628925cb75/ Changeset: 08628925cb75 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-21 11:34:11 Summary: Merge Affected #: 214 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/756a8d346046/ Changeset: 756a8d346046 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-21 16:05:33 Summary: one more "missing" test resource file Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/785a3db3494a/ Changeset: 785a3db3494a User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-21 16:09:29 Summary: extracted test setup Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/72363df803a6/ Changeset: 72363df803a6 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-04-21 16:14:24 Summary: some more examples of culture-specific numeric conversions Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/0b5fc9af0266/ Changeset: 0b5fc9af0266 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-01 22:02:54 Summary: Merge with dotnetrdf main repo Affected #: 87 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/1773e003df90/ Changeset: 1773e003df90 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-01 22:14:33 Summary: fix some unmerged test code (NUnit) Affected #: 8 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/b8bf2622a532/ Changeset: b8bf2622a532 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-01 22:48:30 Summary: update the refactored BaseParserSuite with changes from CORE-314 branch Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/19bf87af4aa7/ Changeset: 19bf87af4aa7 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-01 22:48:51 Summary: again :), some missing path segment to test files Affected #: 5 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/60122292fd1f/ Changeset: 60122292fd1f User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-03 11:26:16 Summary: some more missing resource folder Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/484abe9f59fb/ Changeset: 484abe9f59fb User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-03 17:27:43 Summary: overcome a bug in NUnit with equality assertion for IEnumerables Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/d47a90e718ee/ Changeset: d47a90e718ee User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-03 17:50:45 Summary: refactor TriX performace tests and removed timeout Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/969353345dc5/ Changeset: 969353345dc5 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-03 18:18:27 Summary: changed SPARQL with escaped dot to verbatim string Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/c9ff742f29d6/ Changeset: c9ff742f29d6 User: tpluscode Date: 2013-05-04 18:39:47 Summary: Merge with main repo Affected #: 49 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/50f4263a1aa8/ Changeset: 50f4263a1aa8 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-08 19:37:45 Summary: Merge Tom's NUnit changes Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/881ef31ff20b/ Changeset: 881ef31ff20b User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-08 19:47:59 Summary: Convert most recently added tests to NUnit Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 22:57:47 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 4 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 4 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/fc9a3410292c/ Changeset: fc9a3410292c Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 00:51:42 Summary: Start bumping versions to start next dev cycle Affected #: 4 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/a1aeaef378c5/ Changeset: a1aeaef378c5 Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 00:52:15 Summary: Bump assembly versions for next dev cycle Affected #: 30 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/686b5e4855a3/ Changeset: 686b5e4855a3 Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 00:54:38 Summary: Bump versions in NuSpec files where appropriate Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/e701821883dd/ Changeset: e701821883dd Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 00:57:16 Summary: Bump version constants in NAnt build file Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 18:10:51 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 7 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 7 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/323f504b91da/ Changeset: 323f504b91da Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 19:33:37 Summary: Make all builds of core libraries (bar Silverlight) be strong named signed Affected #: 30 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/02ebd576e2d4/ Changeset: 02ebd576e2d4 Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 19:46:17 Summary: Update ignore list Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/164b723226dc/ Changeset: 164b723226dc Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 19:49:03 Summary: Remove explicit KeyOriginatorFile argument from NAnt builds now that project files include this Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/5cd1876f5048/ Changeset: 5cd1876f5048 Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 19:59:04 Summary: Add snk to excluded extensions for LicenseChecker targets Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/81fe48c80105/ Changeset: 81fe48c80105 Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:08:37 Summary: Remove unecessary dependency declaration from NuSpec file, note change around signing in Change Log Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/d205811d1433/ Changeset: d205811d1433 Branch: strong-naming User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:09:46 Summary: Closing the strong-naming branch now that VS project files are signing relevant projects so there can't be any difference between what is built when using NAnt and VS Affected #: 0 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/6bc7bc72489a/ Changeset: 6bc7bc72489a User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-09 20:10:40 Summary: Merge in strong-naming branch, VS project files now specify that the assemblies are signed where appropriate which stops there being any difference between NAnt and VS builds for core libraries Affected #: 67 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ dotNetRDF-commits mailing list dot...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-commits End of dotNetRDF-commits Digest, Vol 8, Issue 2 *********************************************** |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-05-08 18:49:14
|
Yes I looked over these, I think there is only one that I had a specific comment on I need to play a bit more as I may need to fix up some of my build scripts to include your NuGet version patching approach for when I want to build packages manually Rob From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tom...@gm...> Reply-To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:32 AM To: dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Subject: Re: [dotNetRDF-Develop] NUnit Transition > Hi Rob > > Good news. I will ditch my repo now. > > I hope you are aware that I have also introduced numerous other changes to > make TeamCity work. Mainy some changes to csproj files and nuspec. > > Tom > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote: >> Hey All >> >> I merged Tom's changes into default on the main repository today and >> converted over a couple of remaining MSTest tests I recently added. >> >> So we are now fully on NUnit, thanks for doing all the leg work on this Tom. >> I have to say that I immediately like the NUnit/Resharper integration, it is >> much nicer and more intuitive than MSTest :D >> >> I will update the documentation on the wiki ASAP >> (https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/wiki/DeveloperGuide/Test%20Environ >> ment) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rob >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------->> - >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >> their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed >> leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. >> Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may >> _______________________________________________ >> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >> dot...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the > definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page > book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access > version is available now. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may___________________________________________ > ____ dotNetRDF-develop mailing list dot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop |
From: Tomasz P. <tom...@gm...> - 2013-05-08 18:33:43
|
Hi Rob Good news. I will ditch my repo now. I hope you are aware that I have also introduced numerous other changes to make TeamCity work. Mainy some changes to csproj files and nuspec. Tom On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote: > Hey All > > I merged Tom's changes into default on the main repository today and > converted over a couple of remaining MSTest tests I recently added. > > So we are now fully on NUnit, thanks for doing all the leg work on this > Tom. I have to say that I immediately like the NUnit/Resharper > integration, it is much nicer and more intuitive than MSTest :D > > I will update the documentation on the wiki ASAP ( > https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/wiki/DeveloperGuide/Test%20Environment > ) > > Thanks, > > Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and > their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed > leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. > Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > dotNetRDF-develop mailing list > dot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop > > |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-05-08 18:29:02
|
Hey All I merged Tom's changes into default on the main repository today and converted over a couple of remaining MSTest tests I recently added. So we are now fully on NUnit, thanks for doing all the leg work on this Tom. I have to say that I immediately like the NUnit/Resharper integration, it is much nicer and more intuitive than MSTest :D I will update the documentation on the wiki ASAP (https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/wiki/DeveloperGuide/Test%20Enviro nment) Thanks, Rob |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-05-07 22:48:05
|
Hi All Some of you may already have seen the announcement via other channels but dotNetRDF 1.0.0 has finally been released as of yesterday. It is available via all the normal channels website, SourceForge, BitBucket, CodePlex and NuGet. You can view the full release announcement on our blog at http://www.dotnetrdf.org/blogitem.asp?blogID=75 Highlights of this release include a variety of performance and bug fixes but also some minor new features: * Full support for the W3C Candidate Recommendation for Turtle (Feb 19th 2013) * New instance mode for simplified Configuration API usage * New ReadWriteSparqlConnector for connecting to arbitrary triple stores which provide both a Query and Update endpoint I personally would like to reiterate a huge thank you to both our developers and everyone in the community who has contributed to the project in any shape or form. You guys have helped make dotNetRDF what is today and grow from an academic side project to the de factor standard for developing RDF and SPARQL applications on the .Net Platform. Thanks for all your contributions and I hope many of you will continue to contribute as we move forward with dotNetRDF, we have some cool new features planned which we hope to start getting in your hands soon! Rob Vesse |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-05-07 16:55:09
|
Hi dotNetRDF is an RDF API it does not have any specific OWL support. That being said OWL may be represented in RDF in which case you can create an RDF representation of your OWL ontology and save it which will then allow you to load it into Protégé. Protégé should support common RDF formats like RDF/XML and Turtle though unless your OWL ontology is appropriately encoded as RDF you may not get much useful information when you load the data into Protégé Rob From: Brad/Bahadorreza OFOGHI <br_...@ya...> Reply-To: Brad/Bahadorreza OFOGHI <br_...@ya...>, dotNetRDF Developer Discussion and Feature Request <dot...@li...> Date: Sunday, May 5, 2013 10:31 PM To: "dot...@li..." <dot...@li...> Subject: [dotNetRDF-Develop] owl ontology > Dear Madam/Sir, > > I am using dotNetRDF to create an ontology and load it in Protege. However, > the output of RdfXmlWriter is an RDF file instead of an OWL file which makes > it impossible to be loaded in Protege as far as I understand. > > So, is there any way that the graph can be stored in a file as an OWL ontology > rather than an RDF file using the dotNetRDF API? > > thanks and kind regards, > Bahador > > > Bahadorreza OFOGHI, PhD > Major: Information Technology > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the > definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page > book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access > version is available now. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may___________________________________________ > ____ dotNetRDF-develop mailing list dot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop |
From: Brad/Bahadorreza O. <br_...@ya...> - 2013-05-06 05:31:29
|
Dear Madam/Sir, I am using dotNetRDF to create an ontology and load it in Protege. However, the output of RdfXmlWriter is an RDF file instead of an OWL file which makes it impossible to be loaded in Protege as far as I understand. So, is there any way that the graph can be stored in a file as an OWL ontology rather than an RDF file using the dotNetRDF API? thanks and kind regards, Bahador Bahadorreza OFOGHI, PhD Major: Information Technology |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-05-01 23:25:34
|
<p>The following issue has been added to a project that you are monitoring.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Upgrade Virtuoso ADO.Net providers to latest releases</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Data.Virtuoso (dotNetRDF.Data.Virtuoso.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Rob Vesse</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Milestone:</b></td> <td>1.0.1</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Category:</b></td> <td>Virtuoso Support</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Priority:</b></td> <td>High</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Type:</b></td> <td>Improvement</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Description:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> The current Virtuoso ADO.Net providers used are somewhat out of date so we should upgrade them to the latest versions that accompany the recent Virtuoso 7 release. Unfortunately there do appear to be some issues with these that need resolving before these can be upgraded to, specifically for some reason the .Net 3.5 driver is no longer targeting the Client Profile even though the .Net 4.0 driver is.</p></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=359" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=359</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |
From: <dot...@li...> - 2013-05-01 22:49:00
|
Send dotNetRDF-commits mailing list submissions to dot...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-commits or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to dot...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at dot...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of dotNetRDF-commits digest..." Today's Topics: 1. commit/dotnetrdf: 7 new changesets (Bitbucket) 2. commit/dotnetrdf: 7 new changesets (Bitbucket) 3. commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Add additional tests for BIND (Bitbucket) 4. commit/dotnetrdf: 5 new changesets (Bitbucket) 5. commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Note fix for CORE-358 in Change Log (Bitbucket) 6. commit/dotnetrdf: 2 new changesets (Bitbucket) 7. commit/dotnetrdf: 5 new changesets (Bitbucket) 8. commit/dotnetrdf: 5 new changesets (Bitbucket) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:25:26 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 7 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 7 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/7bcde41bb43d/ Changeset: 7bcde41bb43d Branch: CORE-314 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 19:59:20 Summary: Make IRI validation configurable and off by default (CORE-314) Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/f27f3834343b/ Changeset: f27f3834343b Branch: CORE-314 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 20:38:04 Summary: Move CharHelper stuff into UnicodeSpecsHelper, implement ConvertToChars() for Silverlight since Char.ConvertFromUtf32() is not supported (CORE-314) Affected #: 10 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/ece3f023ab0b/ Changeset: ece3f023ab0b Branch: CORE-314 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 20:43:18 Summary: Fix a regression in SPARQL 1.0 parsing caused by more restrictive handling of \u escapes in QNames (CORE-314) Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/cbc1a2853160/ Changeset: cbc1a2853160 Branch: CORE-314 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 21:10:36 Summary: Fix a test regression caused by new stricter escape handling (CORE-314) Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/58bac7231bc6/ Changeset: 58bac7231bc6 Branch: CORE-314 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 21:18:42 Summary: Update Change Log to note Turtle support and related changes (CORE-314) Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/a9be16829bf8/ Changeset: a9be16829bf8 Branch: CORE-314 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 21:19:29 Summary: Closes the CORE-314 branch now Turtle support is stable and regression testing and fixes have been carried out Affected #: 0 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/c6ce2187786b/ Changeset: c6ce2187786b User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 21:20:42 Summary: Merge final state of CORE-314 branch into default Affected #: 16 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:24:21 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 7 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 7 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/7cd1f641f14e/ Changeset: 7cd1f641f14e Branch: CORE-353 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 21:29:50 Summary: Change to SP2B harness to support testing for (CORE-353) Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/556c6d6ca83a/ Changeset: 556c6d6ca83a Branch: CORE-353 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 21:42:50 Summary: Fixes to configuration of SP2B harness (CORE-353) Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/a56001b2bd41/ Changeset: a56001b2bd41 Branch: CORE-353 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 21:47:48 Summary: Fixes to configuration of BSBM harness (CORE-353) Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/2747445e7c93/ Changeset: 2747445e7c93 Branch: CORE-353 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 23:14:21 Summary: Initial commit of new ORDER BY + DISTINCT optimiser (CORE-353) Affected #: 12 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/69376a4ab303/ Changeset: 69376a4ab303 Branch: CORE-353 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 23:23:01 Summary: Update ChangeLog to add CORE-353 additions Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/2152d61a1073/ Changeset: 2152d61a1073 Branch: CORE-353 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 23:23:11 Summary: Close the CORE-353 branch Affected #: 0 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/0b373c83e478/ Changeset: 0b373c83e478 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 23:23:55 Summary: Merge new algebra optimizations from CORE-353 branch to default Affected #: 16 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:57:30 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Add additional tests for BIND To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 1 new commit in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/9dc4f5e0f1ec/ Changeset: 9dc4f5e0f1ec User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-26 23:36:13 Summary: Add additional tests for BIND Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:09:26 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 5 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 5 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/b7d339d77f98/ Changeset: b7d339d77f98 Branch: CORE-358 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-29 22:57:56 Summary: Improve an error message from RDF/XML parser (CORE-358) Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/5179aa206881/ Changeset: 5179aa206881 Branch: CORE-358 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-29 23:01:09 Summary: Failing test case for CORE-358 Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/fcb862912a14/ Changeset: fcb862912a14 Branch: CORE-358 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-29 23:08:13 Summary: Fix for CORE-358, ensure works both using the DOM and Streaming parsers Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/1f0202c8c470/ Changeset: 1f0202c8c470 Branch: CORE-358 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-29 23:08:48 Summary: Close CORE-358 branch now bug is fixed Affected #: 0 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/1ad1f1ca0800/ Changeset: 1ad1f1ca0800 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-29 23:09:04 Summary: Merge fix for CORE-358 Affected #: 3 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:11:23 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: rvesse: Note fix for CORE-358 in Change Log To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 1 new commit in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/c001ef5734fa/ Changeset: c001ef5734fa User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-29 23:11:13 Summary: Note fix for CORE-358 in Change Log Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:21:41 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 2 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 2 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/fc480287c9a4/ Changeset: fc480287c9a4 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-30 23:09:38 Summary: Add missing test resource for CORE-358 test Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/cd1d4494165a/ Changeset: cd1d4494165a User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-30 23:21:28 Summary: More improvements to ensure numeric parsing uses Invariant culture Affected #: 8 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:43:18 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 5 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 5 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/e9d76e27d894/ Changeset: e9d76e27d894 User: rvesse Date: 2013-04-30 23:24:51 Summary: Add missing license headers Affected #: 4 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/7bfefad87b71/ Changeset: 7bfefad87b71 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-01 01:00:30 Summary: Add support for ReadWriteSparqlConnector to Store Manager, improve reporting of its IOBehaviour (CORE-346) Affected #: 7 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/76aff00eba4f/ Changeset: 76aff00eba4f User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-01 01:09:04 Summary: Tweak to connection definitions for Store Manager (CORE-346) Affected #: 2 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/b80d707ea27f/ Changeset: b80d707ea27f User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-01 01:11:40 Summary: Bump Json.Net dependency to 5.0.4, update NuSpec files appropriately Affected #: 21 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/72048bede320/ Changeset: 72048bede320 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-01 01:22:32 Summary: Add Release Notes to NuSpec files Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 22:48:52 -0000 From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> Subject: [dotNetRDF Commits] commit/dotnetrdf: 5 new changesets To: dot...@li... Message-ID: <201...@bi...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 5 new commits in dotnetrdf: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/4038c11b7cc6/ Changeset: 4038c11b7cc6 Branch: virtuoso-7 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-01 23:59:51 Summary: Initial upgrade of Virtuoso ADO.Net provider to 7.0.3202.3, no regression testing performed yet Affected #: 12 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/7415f25ec172/ Changeset: 7415f25ec172 Branch: virtuoso-7 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-02 00:08:52 Summary: Add support for new Virtuoso return types for Date Times Affected #: 1 file https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/eaed096d6864/ Changeset: eaed096d6864 Branch: virtuoso-7 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-02 00:23:45 Summary: Fix some places where the Virtuoso connection might not be closed correctly Affected #: 3 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/24ecaaa9862a/ Changeset: 24ecaaa9862a Branch: virtuoso-7 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-02 00:34:27 Summary: Remove obsolete VirtuosoTripleStore Affected #: 5 files https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/commits/5953fecfcee5/ Changeset: 5953fecfcee5 Branch: virtuoso-7 User: rvesse Date: 2013-05-02 00:48:36 Summary: Fix dotNetRDF.Data.Virtuoso.ClientProfile not actually targeting the Client Profile Affected #: 1 file Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ dotNetRDF-commits mailing list dot...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-commits End of dotNetRDF-commits Digest, Vol 8, Issue 1 *********************************************** |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-04-30 21:05:59
|
Hey I have looked over the TeamCity stuff in part but haven't had chance to fully digest it yet. I am thinking of making this one of my main goals for 1.0.1. As I said in my previous email I think I am now ready to push out 1.0.0 so I will try and do that at the end of the week after running some final regression testing. Other comments are inline: On 4/21/13 8:53 AM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" <tom...@gm...> wrote: >Hi guys > >Here's an update on my work setting up TeamCity. I've got all the >changes done do that the project builds and tests are run [1], and I'm >creating NuGet packages as discussed earlier [2, 3]. Mercurial >automatically triggers builds. When a build is successful and all >tests pass, NuGet packages are created. The packages are named as >discussed earlier and. What remains is to add automatic publishing for >prerelease builds and manual for stable builds. What you have so far looks great :) >I also think that the >tags should be created in the repository only when a package is >released publicly on NuGet. Otherwise I don't think it should be done. Yes I agree, it makes sense only to add a tag when we actually push up a package > >Rob, please tell me what important steps I might have missed in >TeamCity that you would have done with the dotnetrdf.build script. Depends if we want to build other artifacts such as the Toolkit in which case we might want to run the NAnt targets that package those up into ZIP files and FTP those up to the website. Not sure how valuable that is to users though, having regular nightly builds of the libraries easily available should be the main priority. > >Also there is a number of further issues: >1. MSBuild can't build vdproj setup packages. I may have to install >Visual Studio after all. Depends whether we want to build and publish everything through TeamCity or use it primarily for CI of the libraries? >2. None of the tests, which require the UnitTestConfig.propertie file >are currently run. We should probably discuss separately how much resources the CI machine has and which triple stores we could reasonably run on there, a couple which are easy to install and relatively resource lightweight are Fuseki and Sesame. Also if we can fire up IIS express so we can run the tests that test our ASP.Net support that would be valuable. >3. I have noticed that some tests aren't independent from outside >world, like the recently failed >SparqlDatasetDefaultGraphManagementWithUpdate tests, which failed >because dotnetrdf.org returned HTTP code 503. I think we should work >on making these tests as self-sustaining as possible Yes we should continue to try and make tests as self-contained as possible, I've been trying to do this more and more as I run tests and find those that fail intermittently or depend on outside resources which aren't currently using the UnitTestConfig.properties mechanism to control their runs. >4. Other thatn that some tests still fail, and these should be >corrected before TeamCity will produce any NuGet package at all Some of the test failures appear to relate to things around my recent Turtle support improvements and have been fixed in default. I think some of the MIME types failing tests are down to a Culture issue - https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/src/c001ef5734fa6b4e9e6bc9c4b8da0 92c1fc9e29d/Libraries/core/net40/Core/MimeTypeDefinition.cs?at=default#cl-8 60 uses Double.TryParse() but doesn't specify invariant culture. Otherwise there is only 1 I see there that I know fails intermittently (the query timeout one) so not sure why the others fail in your TeamCity environment and not in my own environment. >5. I would like to merge my changes to default branch. Please review >the changes in my fork [4]. I will start trying to do this next week, I will do this myself manually if that is OK because it will be useful for me to refresh my NUnit knowledge by converting over any remaining tests that need conversion. Rob > >Thanks, >Tom > >[1]: http://ci.t-code.pl/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt2 >[2]: http://ci.t-code.pl/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt4 >[3]: http://ci.t-code.pl/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt5 >[4]: https://bitbucket.org/tpluscode/dotnetrdf-teamcity > >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Tomasz Pluskiewicz ><tom...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi again >> >> I have been struggling to put those file somewhere on the system and >> fool msbuild to use them but it didn't seem to work. >> >> I settled for a compromise, which is keeping the files in a separate >> repo [1], which is fetched on top of the main files and the Phone >> csproj is patched as needed. Now all builds fine and we won't need to >> pollute the solution. >> >> Tom >> >> [1]: https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/wp7hack >> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Khalil Ahmed >><ka...@ne...> wrote: >>> Its probably Hyper-V that is causing the failure. If you are >>>installing on >>> to a machine that doesn't meet the requirements for Hyper-V then the >>> emulator won't install. I think you are probably stuck with having to >>>put >>> the files somewhere - either in the repo or in some location external >>>to the >>> repo that is then configured in the build process. >>> >>> K >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Tomasz Pluskiewicz >>> <tom...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> I did try that. Still, it fails on installing Windows Phone Emulator >>>> x64. The error is something with VMM service, which I don't have and >>>> couldn't find a way to install. >>>> >>>> However on second thought if I was able to put the WP7 files in repo I >>>> should be able to copy them where they belong without installing and I >>>> hope it will work too. >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> >>>>wrote: >>>> > Tom >>>> > >>>> > You can install WP7 tools on Windows Server 2008 because I used to >>>>build >>>> > releases on my Server 2008 machine when I was at the University of >>>> > Southampton >>>> > >>>> > See >>>>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2010/05/02/10005980.aspx >>>> > which details the steps necessary, basically you have to extract the >>>> > installer and modify a config file >>>> > >>>> > Rob >>>> > >>>> > On 4/16/13 1:30 PM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" >>>><tom...@gm...> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>Hi Rob, Kal >>>> >> >>>> >>I have been able to force TeamCity to build dotNetRDF with >>>>relatively >>>> >>minimal changes. Please refer to my fork [1]. I have switched from >>>> >>MSTest to NUnit and done some minor changes to csproj files. There >>>>is >>>> >>also a proposal to change the integration tests to come out >>>> >>inconclusive instead of failed when test config is missing... >>>> >> >>>> >>Most noteworthy is the latest commit in the 'WP7 Hack' branch. >>>> >>Unfortunately I found out the hard way that Windows Phone SDK 7.1 is >>>> >>not only unsuppported on Windows Server 2008 R2, it is completely >>>> >>uninstallable! The only working solution I found was to stuff 14 MB >>>>of >>>> >>WP7 SDK files and build targets and have the WindowsPhone project >>>>use >>>> >>them instead of the defaults. This way the whole solution builds >>>>fine >>>> >>from sln file using msbuild. >>>> >> >>>> >>You can have a look at the project here: http://ci.t-code.pl (guest >>>> >>login enabled) >>>> >> >>>> >>Regarding your eariler emails, I think that version numbering should >>>> >>be moved from solution to TeamCity completely. This way we can >>>> >>flexibly control that number and pass it between build >>>> >>steps/configurations. >>>> >> >>>> >>Next step will be to build and publish nuget packages. Satisfying >>>> >>dependencies between packages will have to be done in some kind of >>>> >>nuspec patching step to modify the <dependency> tags. Hence why we >>>> >>need to control the version withing the CI server. >>>> >> >>>> >>I will write more when the TC configuration is more complete >>>> >> >>>> >>Tom >>>> >> >>>> >>[1]: https://bitbucket.org/tpluscode/dotnetrdf-teamcity >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>----- >>>> >>---- >>>> >>Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced >>>> >>analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for >>>> >> building >>>> >>apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use >>>> >>our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free >>>>account! >>>> >>http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter >>>> >>_______________________________________________ >>>> >>dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >>>> >>dot...@li... >>>> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>------- >>>> > Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced >>>> > analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for >>>> > building >>>> > apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use >>>> > our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free >>>>account! >>>> > http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >>>> > dot...@li... >>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>------- >>>> Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced >>>> analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for >>>>building >>>> apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use >>>> our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free >>>>account! >>>> http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >>>> dot...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kal Ahmed >>> Director, Networked Planet Limited >>> e: kal...@ne... >>> w: www.networkedplanet.com >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>------ >>> Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced >>> analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for >>>building >>> apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use >>> our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! >>> http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >>> dot...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >>> > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- >Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced >analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building >apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use >our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! >http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter >_______________________________________________ >dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >dot...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop |
From: Rob V. <rv...@do...> - 2013-04-30 20:49:47
|
Hey Tom Thanks for fixing these things I ended up merging the CharHelper stuff back into UnicodeSpecsHelper since it made more sense for them to be there. Yes the SparqlConnectorLoadMethod is not necessary under Silverlight because the two classes that use it are not supported on that platform. I am going to save fluent query for 1.0.1, as part of 1.0.1 I want to get your NUnit changes merged into default and convert over fluent-query test infrastructure as part of that. That will also give me time to play with fluent query properly and write up/transfer documentation for it into the main wiki I think 1.0.0 is now ready to go, I have pushed off some stuff that could have been worked on to later releases in the interests of getting a new release out at the end of the week since there are many bug fixes and improvements I would like to get into the hands of users before starting to pump in new features again. Rob On 4/20/13 11:48 PM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" <tom...@gm...> wrote: >I was thinking that maybe the fluent queries could be merged back to >trunk. Even though incomplete, should be in a stable enought state and >we could get some user feedback. > >Other than that I noticed that latest Turtle/Sparql changes caused >Silverlight builds to fail. I was able to fix one of those issues in >commit 085ea4cc65d7 (missing Char methods in SL), but I'm not sure how >to approach the other (you used SparqlConnectorLoadMethod in >StorageFactory). Looks like like I could comment it out but I'm not >sure. > >Tom > >On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Rob Vesse <rv...@do...> wrote: >> Hey All >> >> I was originally going to try and push out 1.0.0 but I have decided to >>delay >> by another week or two to try and get some extra stuff done. >> >> In particular some of the stuff in the CORE-314 branch (latest Turtle >>spec >> support) highlighted another error in GraphMatcher and some general >>bugs in >> Turtle parsing beyond those related to meeting the latest spec. I have >>code >> in that branch passing the bulk of the tests (259 passed, 14 failed, 15 >> indeterminate) and nothing fails fatally (I.e. stack traces) right now >>so >> it's already in fairly good shape. I will likely merge what I have so >>far >> to default anyway since it improves Turtle support even if it isn't yet >> perfect and fixes the aforementioned issues. >> >> There is also the CORE-346 branch which has a new >>ReadWriteSparqlConnector >> which is the update capable version of SparqlConnector which is stable >>and >> passing the new tests I wrote for it. >> >> I would also like to at least look at CORE-349 (a bug with * in property >> paths) in case there is a trivial fix there. >> >> Anything else small and self contained that people would like to get >>into >> 1.0.0 if they can? >> >> Rob >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>----- >> Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced >> analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for >>building >> apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use >> our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! >> http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter >> _______________________________________________ >> dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >> dot...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop >> > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- >Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced >analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building >apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use >our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! >http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter >_______________________________________________ >dotNetRDF-develop mailing list >dot...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dotnetrdf-develop |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-04-29 20:41:19
|
<p>The following issue has been added to a project that you are monitoring.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>RDF/XML parser should allow element names with xml: prefix</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Rob Vesse</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Milestone:</b></td> <td>Unassigned</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Category:</b></td> <td>Parsing</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Priority:</b></td> <td>Normal</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Type:</b></td> <td>Bug</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Description:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> A StackOverflow question highlighted a bug in the RDF/XML parser - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16285690/unable-to-parse-this-rdf-xml-since-system-xml-was-unable-to-parse-the-document</p> <p> The bug is that element names in the XML namespace should be allowed where currently there are not, the fix should be relatively trivial since we simply need to always define the xml namespace at the start of parsing</p></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=358" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=358</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-04-26 21:21:51
|
<p>The following issue has been updated by Rob Vesse:</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Add new optimization for ORDER BY + DISTINCT combinations</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><b>Changes:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <ul> <li>Status changed from "In Progress" to "Completed" </li> <li>Resolution changed from "Unassigned" to "Completed" </li> <li>Progress changed from "0 %" to "100 %" </li> </ul> </td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=353" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=353</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-04-26 21:21:29
|
<p>A new comment has been added to the following issue.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Add new optimization for ORDER BY + DISTINCT combinations</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Rob Vesse</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Date:</b></td> <td>2013-04-26 10:20 PM</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Comment:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> With the optimization in place I get the following results:</p> <ul> <li> ORDER BY + DISTINCT on same level = 1.4s</li> <li> ORDER BY + DISTINCT in sub-query = 1.5s</li> <li> ORDER BY + REDUCED on same level = 4.8s</li> <li> ORDER BY + REDUCED in sub-query = 5.1s</li> </ul></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=353" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=353</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-04-26 19:55:24
|
<p>A new comment has been added to the following issue.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Add new optimization for ORDER BY + DISTINCT combinations</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Rob Vesse</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Date:</b></td> <td>2013-04-26 08:54 PM</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Comment:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> Prior to adding the optimization I got the following results using essentially the same dataset and machine setup as I did for the Jena tests:</p> <ul> <li> ORDER BY + DISTINCT on same level = 4.9s</li> <li> ORDER BY + DISTINCT in sub-query = 1.7s</li> <li> ORDER BY + REDUCED on same level = 5.4s</li> <li> ORDER BY + REDUCED in sub-query = 5.3s</li> </ul></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=353" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=353</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-04-26 19:28:16
|
<p>The following issue has been updated by Rob Vesse:</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Upgrade support for Turtle to latest drafts</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><b>Changes:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <ul> <li>Status changed from "In Progress" to "Completed" </li> <li>Resolution changed from "Unassigned" to "Completed" </li> <li>Progress changed from "95 %" to "100 %" </li> </ul> </td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=314" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=314</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-04-26 19:27:52
|
<p>A new comment has been added to the following issue.</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Upgrade support for Turtle to latest drafts</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Created By:</b></td> <td>Rob Vesse</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Date:</b></td> <td>2013-04-26 08:26 PM</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Comment:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><p> This work is now completed, as a side effect there have been some changes made to the IO subsystems:</p> <ul> <li> Escape character handling is now much stricter, previously invalid escape sequences were silently ignored whereas they now generate parser errors</li> <li> Escaping in writer output has been much improved, escaping should be more reliable and ensure more consistent round tripping of data</li> <li> Optional IRI validation (disabled by default) is available for the Turtle parser, this functionality may be extended to other parsers in the future</li> </ul></td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=314" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=314</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |
From: <tr...@do...> - 2013-04-26 17:15:27
|
<p>The following issue has been updated by Rob Vesse:</p> <table border="0"> <tr> <td width="90px" valign="top"><b>Title:</b></td> <td>Upgrade support for Turtle to latest drafts</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Project:</b></td> <td>Core Library (dotNetRDF.dll)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><b>Changes:</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <ul> <li>Related issue changed from "" to "Added" </li> </ul> </td> </tr> </table> <p> More information on this issue can be found at <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=314" target="_blank">http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Issues/IssueDetail.aspx?id=314</a></p> <p style="text-align:center;font-size:8pt;padding:5px;"> If you no longer wish to receive notifications, please visit <a href="http://www.dotnetrdf.org/tracker/Account/UserProfile.aspx" target="_blank">your profile</a> and change your notifications options. </p> |